I am hosting it too at http://www.apachelounge.com/download ,
see at the bottom af the page.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 09:36
Subject: Randy Kobe's
Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 06
was tallied.
Then I see no way to let so much ppl test to verify the quality.
I plan to remove the binary or that they can download on request to me, a
pity.
Btw. I see no difference to publish unreleased binaries or sources like you
do.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe
. etc.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 20:21
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gustavo Lopes wrote:
No problems compiling
+1 for 2.2.5 on Win32 with VC2005 SP1
Build without any issue and running now 2.2.5 at www.apache.lounge.com .
For testing you can download 2.2.5 at www.apache.lounge.com/download
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL
Sorry a typo in the links, so again:
+1 for 2.2.5 on Win32 with VC2005 SP1
Build without any issue and running now 2.2.5 at www.apachelounge.com .
For testing you can download 2.2.5 at www.apachelounge.com/download
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED
mailfolder is
full.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2007 00:09
Subject: Apachelounge problems
Hmmm... seems that - even though we've *repeated* this multiple
Thanks for the answer.
I shall keep the site down, I am very disappointed and I feel threatened by
you for legal stuff.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2007 01:31
Subject: Re: Apachelounge
The angst over Steffen's build sounds a bit more territorial than legal
to me. Just my 2c worth...
Tom, indeed that is my feeling : territorial.
There is more, see my next post about the Apache Feather I have to remove.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Tom Donovan [EMAIL
Technologies is also trying to protect there position as
distributor ?
So I will keeping www.apachelounge.com down , I do not not want to much
hassle to sort out the issues addressed here.
The forum www.apachelounge.com/forum/ shall I keep up for some time, so
users can read the posts.
Steffen
zlib-1.2.3 :
--
- Original Message -
From: Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2007 11:38
Subject: Re: Apachelounge problems
Hello Steffen,
I'm a Tomcat committer but not part of the httpd project. Nevertheless
as all
software, lest we forget
that httpd has become their product vs. our web server.
Members of the Apache Lounge team has discussed the issues: We are closing
Apache Lounge.
For me it is not worth to spend anymore time on promoting Apache on Windows
and given free support.
Steffen
starting to act more corporate and
less community-oriented. Sad, but we live in a changing world and this
legalistic-corporate-nasty trend is likely to continue for a while.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
standalone
or bundled as part of Covalent Enterprise Ready Server (ERS).
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2007 17:25
Subject: Re: Apachelounge has to remove Apachelounge Feather
www.apachelounge.com .
Till now, I received no answer ?
Steffen
little things:
mod_bucketeer.so is not build out of the box with Win32 gui-build.
zlib1.dll is now copied to /bin , seems to me not necessary.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 04 September
I get this kind off error too when stopping.
Never seen before:
Failed to dup STDIN: Bad file descriptor.
Error in my_thread_global_end(): 251 threads didn't exit
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 04
Also mod_perl is not working here with Win32. No indication in the logs.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 04 September, 2007 23:29
Subject: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release
I have no zlib1.dll on my box and mod_deflate works fine. It's
included/static in mod-deflate.so.
Next time I shall ship it too, does not harm.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 05 September, 2007 21
Nope, was not running mod_fcgid.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 05 September, 2007 21:44
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
tarballs for review
Steffen wrote
k
I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is not
compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to stay on
2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
Steffen
www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev
.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 15:48
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
tarballs for review
On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Jim
, not a lot
windows users are posting on the lists. I shall put a an extra note that
they cannot expect response on the lists.
Btw.
The authors of the modules are investigating the issues right now. I do not
expect that they are coming soon with solutions.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From
heavy loaded sites.
The guess is based on the ~80.000 downloads of 2.2.4 from the
www.apachelounge.com . And also now a days quite some users Win 32 building
Apache.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06
Better we stop this thread.
See the post at: http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8691 ,
please do not reply to that post.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 21:47
Subject: Re
.
Can we stop now this discussion ?
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 22:20
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
tarballs for review
Ummm hrmm:
A hurry
.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 23:22
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
tarballs for review
Steffen wrote:
I the meantime we have to advise
Several 2rd-party modules (mod_fcgid, mod_fastcgi, mod_perl, mod_watch etc.)
are given issues with 2.2.6 on Windows.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 22:20
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6
To inform you.
We at http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8901 made a binary
available which works with mod-perl and mod-perl etc.
Steffen
the Windows Community has no need to hurry a new 2.2.7.
We are also a little afraid that same things can happen as with the
unusually closely 2.2.5==2.2.6 process, a broken build.
Steffen
www.apachelounge.com
*not affiliated with the Apache Software Foundation or with the Apache HTTP
Server Project
Not really of my concern.
I want to give attention to
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/apache-226/
May be agood time to reconsider the depency for example with APR.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 26
is 'mysterious'.
The AL 2.2.6 is not mislabeled as 2.2.6. Special for you, I labeled it
with patched and there is exactly explained what the patches are. Please do
not start a dicussion again which there was with 2.2.5.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
+1 I compiled 2.1.10 on windows with Visual C++ 2005.
No issues to report all working fine for more then a day.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
ps.
I was not able to compile mod_dbd and Mod_authn_dbd.
not included in the dsw and dsp files.
When I compile manual I get:
1Compiling
Build with no issue here on Windows, except mod_authn_db and dmod_dbd.
In the change log:
*) Add mod_authn_dbd (SQL-based authentication) [Nick Kew]
I agree with Jesse:
2.2.0 should not go out the door until we can build mod_authn_db and mod_dbd
on windows.
Steffen
- Original Message
,
mod_fcgid and mod_log_rotate), see www.apachelounge.com.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:24, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote
which version)
For me is a reason to upgrade is mod_authn_db (which relies on mod_dbd) .
When you guys go on with 2.2 then add also a note to mod_authn_db docu that
it is not available on win32.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev
Build the php5apache2.dll ( php 5.1.1 apache2handler) with 2.2.0 on Win32.
No issues.
Steffen
VisualStudio 2005 and had not an issue with building 2.2
Steffen
Ps. Also compiled some modules, see http://www.apachelounge.com/download/
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:46 AM
Subject: Re
and nothing to install.
The Sambar Server( www.sambar.com ) uses this approach.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Directions for Win32 binary httpd
Ok, I've come
All fine with IDE and Command line, Visual Studio 2005.
Also mod_ssl, mod_perl etc. compiles.
Steffen
www.pachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: testers@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:23 AM
crashes:
Faulting application httpd.exe, version 2.2.0.0, faulting module
libmySQL.dll in function: LIBMYSQL!mysql_stmt_bind_result.
Where do I have to report this issue: apr, httpd, webthing or mysql ?
Steffen
.
no problems with accessing Mysql5 databases.
Thanks for pointing in the good direction,
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: mod_authn_db crash
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 19:35
without issues under Windows ?
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
The binary at the Apachelounge is build with the official sources.
And includes mod_authn_alias and mod_ssl
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.0 for Windows
/modules/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.so is garbled - perhaps
this is not an Apache module DSO?
The MMN is the same as 2.2.0 : 20051115:0
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
has to be changed,
see: http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=280#280
Thanks,
Steffen
Build with VS 2005, see for deploying on other computers:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zebw5zk9(en-US,VS.80).aspx
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006
and using
the XCOPY method
Steffen
http://www.sambarserver.info
- Original Message -
From: Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: Apache 2.2.0 on Win32
Yeah, I stumbled upon depends.exe this morning. I used
You are not on the wright track by trying to solve the msjava.dll
dependency.
Just follow the instructions at:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235291.aspx
Steffen
http://www.sambarserver.info
- Original Message -
From: Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev
mod_dbd together with the apr_dbd framework, is listed in the new features
document for 2.2, which rather implies that it should work and is to some
degree supported.
As far as my and other win users experience, I hade to conclude that
mod_dbd/mod_authn_dbd is experimental.
Steffen
not to use VS2005 with Apache 2.2.0 and a
lot of third-party mods. I distribute it and is working on all current
windows versions.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Apache
Compiling on Windows and Apache 2.2.0 works with the patch.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Sierk Bornemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Problem: compiling mod_tidy with Apache 2.2
Hi!
I
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 21:28
In the Change log:
*) Add APR/APR-Util Compiled and Runtime Version numbers to the output of
'httpd -V'. [William Rowe]
After removing this in main.c then it builds fine with VC2005
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent
Perl scripts with shebang line are not working on win32, get permature
end of script headers error.
Btw. mod_perl is working fine.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006
On 2.2.0 (APR 1.2.2) it works ok.
Using the same conf with 2.2.1 it gives the error, even the
standard printenv.pl is the cgi-bin gives the error.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 05
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 05:17
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts
Done.
I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts working now.
Also no build error apu_version anymore.
All tests passed here, including mod_perl and other common mods.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
removed the SSL portion of one virtual host and it then
errored in trying to read the certificate for the first virtual host.
Removing both SSL virtualhost portions allows the server to run fine. The
configuration was copied in whole from a working 2.2.0 install
Steffen
- Original Message
I do not have the issue (now 3 reports at the Apachelounge),
so I cannot give more info, here it was working fine.
I build now with openssl 0.9.8b instead of 0.9.8a.
And suprise, it is working now at that guys.
I come back here when there are still issues.
Steffen
- Original Message
Also all is fine with building against APR 1.2.7.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 19:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Done.
I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts
that
one).
Steffen
Build Win32 with VC2005, up and running on www.apachelounge.com .
Binary available at www.apachelounge.com/download
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; testers@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 06:35
Subject
Maybe you overlooked it, there is a win32 .msi binary, see
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/binaries/win32/
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Sierk Bornemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:05
Subject: Win32 binary port of Apache
are dedicated to *nix
flavors). I have no insight in the ASF vote-system, not sure I could
vote.
I build and running now version 2004 without
issues.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From:
Jorge Schrauwen
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006
16:29
Subject
Please advise which APR, APR-UTIL to build against.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 20:33
Subject: Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3
Jorge Schrauwen
Build with no issues on Win32. Tested all common modules including SSL and
Deflate.
Made it available for testing for Win32 community at www.apachelounge.com
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 27
/win32/BaseAddr.ref
How do I commit this changes ?
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 20:37
Subject: [VOTES] please, 2.2.3, 2.0.59, 1.3.37 releases ASAP
Chinese firedrill time folks
I opt for: Apache Web Server
Apache is more then only based on the HTTP protocol/specification , other
official protocols/specifcations are used by Apache , eg. TLS, zlib
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent
Apache HTTP Server
I assume that the D stands for Deamon, and that is a specific term used in
the *nix world. In eg. Windows Apache is named an Service or Application.
Steffen
ps.
But still I opt for Apache Web Server, it is all what it does.
- Original Message -
From: William
At AL there are reports that also with VC2005-IDE the 2.2.3 Windows source
gives issues.
Is it an idea to revert back to the 2.2.2 method ? there we had no reports
like this.
Indeed the unix source builds fine with VC2005 IDE.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe
I understand now and I missed the script.
I have reports that all now is building fine with VC2005-IDE with the
Windows source after executing the script.
Thanks!
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July
On httpd.apache.org is at 2.059:
The Apache HTTP Server Project is *proud* to announce the legacy...
At 1.3.37
The Apache Group is *pleased* to announce the legacy...
Is the project is still proud to announce 2.0.x ?
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
build the same way also 2.0.59, and that is also working
fine.
You can contact me OL.
Btw.
When you build openssl also with VC2005, then use
OpenSSL/0.9.8b + , then the needed manifest files are included in the
OpenSSLdll's and .exec.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From
integratingthe needed .dlls or above MS binary distroin their
setup. For example Logitech does it inhis software. One drawback is
that it is not supported for old Windows versions like 95 and 98
etc.
So no need to install the huge .NET 2.0
framework.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From
will pay any attention to it.
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 27 December, 2007 15:45
Subject: Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?
Here's what I'd like to propose:
o) We do another
freelist=0x
...} apr_bucket_alloc_t *
libaprutil-1.dll!apr_bucket_alloc(unsigned int size=40, apr_bucket_alloc_t
* list=0x00b71f10) Line 135 C
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 04 January
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2008 12:12
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
prefer not to make again a patch for the
Apachelounge community.
Btw. mod_fcgid looks now ok.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 04 January, 2008 21:00
Subject: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd
-- Restarting.
* Apache 2.2.7 started as single process from command-line
httpd.exe -X
WORKS OK
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
,
But, in console, it breaks the control over the Dos-box. It is cleared and
had to kill httpd.exe's manually when I want to stop Apache.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Tom Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 20:38
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
Steffen wrote:
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL
+1 if I had to vote
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 10 January, 2008 19:04
Subject: Pre-release tarballs: Apache httpd 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server
mod_security 2.5.0, mod_watch,
mod_fcgid, mod_vieuw are running.
Steffen
. This tuning is on by default and cannot be disabled as it
also helps Pentium 4 and other processors.
Steffen.
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2008 22:42
Subject: Re: Experience with Visual Studio 2008
See the notes at http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9870 :
When an unchanged Apache 2.2.8 is run from the command line (vs. run as a
Windows Service), Apache will not stop when the Apache window is closed.
It is fixed in the 2.2.8 download from the Apache Lounge.
Steffen
Builds fine on Windows and successfully installed and tested.
Runs with all popular modules, except mod_fcgid needed a patch (see post
from Tom). After ASF releases 2.2.9 we make a mod-fcgid for 2.2.9 available.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED
HTPD 2.2.9 with Apr[-util] 1.3.2 builds with VC9 without issues.
It installs and runs fine, AL tests passed inluding the new dbd-odbc driver.
Steffen
On Windows building fine and reports from the Apache Lounge community that
all works without issues.
Steffen
To get more ppl to test, I made the module php5apache2_3.dll for Apache 2.3.15
with PHP version 5.4.0RC2 and 5.3.8 available.
See http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=19861
Steffen
mod_fcgid has serious long standing bugs which are reported in
bugzilla, see 51020, 50309 and 48949 .
Please look at it.
mod_fcgid has serious long standing bugs which are reported in
bugzilla, see 51020, 50309 and 48949 .
Please look at it.
Build warnings on Win32:
Warning 1 warning C4018: '' : signed/unsigned mismatch
util_expr_scan.c
Warning 2 warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no
meaning; ignored \server\util_expr_eval.c 50
Warning 3 warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no
meaning;
Build warnings on Win32:
Warning 1 warning C4018: '' : signed/unsigned mismatch
util_expr_scan.c
Warning 2 warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no
meaning; ignored \server\util_expr_eval.c 50
Warning 3 warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no
meaning;
Here with VS 2008, a release build builds all modules out of the box,
except Lua include for a .h file was not there.
And running fine for quite some users.
On Monday 05/12/2011 at 09:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen
Here with VS 2008, a release build builds all modules out of the box,
except Lua include for a .h file was not there.
And running fine for quite some users.
On Monday 05/12/2011 at 09:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen
2.4.0 GA asap; 2.3.15 running fine for quite some Windows admins. On
Apachelounge and related sites for a few weeks, no single issue.
Only hard bugs reported:
Rewrite P as I reported
crashing Watchdog.
Other ones:
mod_fcgid has two serious issues (also in 2.2) see bugzilla.
run in DOS box,
2.4.0 GA asap; 2.3.15 running fine for quite some Windows admins. On
Apachelounge and related sites for a few weeks, no single issue.
Only hard bugs reported:
Rewrite P as I reported
crashing Watchdog.
Other ones:
mod_fcgid has two serious issues (also in 2.2) see bugzilla.
run in DOS box,
:: Server Status Entries
On 22.11.2011 10:28, Steffen wrote:
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already for 20 hours and looks they are staying there forever.
The requests are invalid, not sure since I do not keep the raw logs.
...
...
0-0 3800 0/177/177 _ 64980 1 0.0 0.09
Update: that one with a L is gone after ~33 hours
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:33 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Win 2.3.15 :: Server Status Entries
On 06.12.2011 11:56, Steffen wrote:
Those requests are no longer processed
1 - 100 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
