Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

How would we handle this wrt versions of our plugins when the requirements for those are bumped from Java 6 to Java 7? For example, maven-jar-plugin has plexus-archiver as a dependency. m-jar-p v3.0.2 requires Java 6. Is a bump to v3.1.0 enough for going to Java 7? /Anders On Thu, May 4, 2017

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 With pure JUnit it is not possible. You can only place @Test annotation on method => there will be at least one test in TestClass. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

Re: MNG-6127 to Maven 3.5.1

Hi Mario, I've marked it as 3.5.1-candidate. Patch looks complete to me. Robert On Fri, 05 May 2017 11:17:39 +0200, Mario Krizmanic wrote: Hi, MNG-6127 is ready with included IT. Could you include and merge it? I need it for my maven plugins. Best regards,

Re: Changing versions in Jira Project

Hi Andreas, fixed. Unlike most other ASF projects, Maven has quite some JIRA projects. For maintainability only pmc-member can do this. Robert On Fri, 05 May 2017 10:46:35 +0200, Andreas Dangel wrote: Hi, I guess, I need some help with

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 Because Spock can't (do not want) generate runners at test object creation time. Parametrized runners are generated at runtime and therefore not known at init time. --- If your project is set

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 @Fuud Makes sense. Why, what is the purpose in your f/w to schedule empty runner? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

Re: Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

That's the big question I'd like clarify first. Commons Compress has gone Java 7 in a minor release and people are requesting it for Plexus Archiver... > How would we handle this wrt versions of our plugins when the requirements > for those are bumped from Java 6 to Java 7? > > For example,

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 NoTestsRemainException will be thrown in this case --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > well IMHO we can definitely have everything 7 mandatory... > I'm fine with that, but I think we should at least bump minor version of a plugin when this happens. /Anders > > On 5 May 2017 at 16:45, Anders Hammar

MNG-6127 to Maven 3.5.1

Hi, MNG-6127 is ready with included IT. Could you include and merge it? I need it for my maven plugins. Best regards, Mario Krizmanic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

well IMHO we can definitely have everything 7 mandatory... On 5 May 2017 at 16:45, Anders Hammar wrote: > How would we handle this wrt versions of our plugins when the requirements > for those are bumped from Java 6 to Java 7? > > For example, maven-jar-plugin has

Re: Re: Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > This will also ultimately mean that these plugins will run with Maven 3.3 > only > if someone still uses an older version and Java 6 to build their projects. > I don't follow. Not to confuse anyone we should separate

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Fuud commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 @Jezorko https://github.com/spockframework/spock/pull/558 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.8

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé Boutemy, Robert Scholte, Andreas Dangel (non-binding) PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. -- Andreas Dangel https://github.com/adangel skype: andreas_dangel

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 Question. Could it happen that a runner has no children, as e.g. JUnit's runner builder creates runners? It does not make sense to allocate a thread for empty runner because this is

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 There is one occasion when you set Filter to ParentRunner all children could be filtered out. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Fedor Bobin wrote:

Changing versions in Jira Project

Hi, I guess, I need some help with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPMD : I'd like to release version 3.8 and create 3.9. I don't see the Administration link for the project... am I missing some permissions here? Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Dangel https://github.com/adangel skype:

[ANN] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.8 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven PMD Plugin, version 3.8 A Maven plugin for the PMD toolkit, that produces a report on both code rule violations and detected copy and paste fragments, as well as being able to fail the build based on these metrics.

Re: Re: Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

This will also ultimately mean that these plugins will run with Maven 3.3 only if someone still uses an older version and Java 6 to build their projects. > That's the big question I'd like clarify first. > Commons Compress has gone Java 7 in a minor release and people are requesting > it for

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #114: Parallel runner should not drop away runners that...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114 hm, I am not sure creating runners is possible and even if it is how this could work with us because we create JUnitCore instance and put PC in to if and intercept JUnit builder and

[GitHub] maven-integration-testing pull request #21: [MNG-6127] Add plugin execution ...

Github user mkrizmanic commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/21#discussion_r115063523 --- Diff: core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-6127/plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +

[GitHub] maven-integration-testing pull request #21: [MNG-6127] Add plugin execution ...

Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/21#discussion_r115065672 --- Diff: core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-6127/plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

I gave my spin for the 3.5.1-candidates. I've mentioned the issues I'd like to add, but most are still waiting to be seconded. Robert On Fri, 05 May 2017 19:23:41 +0200, Stephen Connolly wrote: Progress seems to be being made... I'm willing to let

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

We should consider this batch https://github.com/ChristianSchulte/maven/commit/3494c28426b8dd5711b730d622ba98d603caeda6#commitcomment-22009084 if we want to address the issue we talked about on IRC. Michael Am 2017-05-05 um 21:04 schrieb Robert Scholte: I gave my spin for the

Re: MNG-6127 to Maven 3.5.1

Great! Many thanks Mario > On 5 May 2017, at 12:21, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Hi Mario, > > I've marked it as 3.5.1-candidate. > Patch looks complete to me. > > Robert > > On Fri, 05 May 2017 11:17:39 +0200, Mario Krizmanic > wrote: > >>

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

Progress seems to be being made... I'm willing to let current progress continue for the next 1-2 weeks before starting a whip-round to drive towards a release... anyone want me to accelerate? On Tue 25 Apr 2017 at 21:43, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like people

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

Am 2017-05-05 um 19:23 schrieb Stephen Connolly: Progress seems to be being made... I'm willing to let current progress continue for the next 1-2 weeks before starting a whip-round to drive towards a release... anyone want me to accelerate? On Tue 25 Apr 2017 at 21:43, Stephen Connolly < No

[GitHub] maven-integration-testing pull request #21: [MNG-6127] Add plugin execution ...

Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/21#discussion_r115049986 --- Diff: core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-6127/plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

AFAIK you, me and Stephen already agreed that MNG-5935 should be part of 3.5.1 On Fri, 05 May 2017 21:09:02 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: We should consider this batch

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

Hi, On 05/05/17 21:54, Robert Scholte wrote: AFAIK you, me and Stephen already agreed that MNG-5935 should be part of 3.5.1 +1 From me as well for this. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On Fri, 05 May 2017 21:09:02 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: We should consider

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

That wasn't actually my point. Christian wrote that to make the entire chain consistent several issues have to be addressed. Am 2017-05-05 um 21:54 schrieb Robert Scholte: AFAIK you, me and Stephen already agreed that MNG-5935 should be part of 3.5.1 On Fri, 05 May 2017 21:09:02 +0200,

Re: [ANN] First call to round up issues for 3.5.1

This specific issue seems quite isolated to me and is likely introduced when switching from Sonetype Aether to Eclipse Aether, where (IIRC) the boolean became a Boolean. On Fri, 05 May 2017 22:18:11 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: That wasn't actually my point.

Re: Heads up, Plexus IO/Archiver is going Java 7

Am 2017-05-05 um 10:44 schrieb Anders Hammar: On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: This will also ultimately mean that these plugins will run with Maven 3.3 only if someone still uses an older version and Java 6 to build their projects. If someone still