Hi all,
I have updated conf/logging/simplelogger.properties with a new property:
org.slf4j.simpleLogger.logFile=../log.txt
The file is created but I lost the std/out in command-line console when
launching Maven like mvn clean.
After appending logback.xml with multiple loggers in env variable
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.18.1
The release contains a number of bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
It looks like this was concurrency issue.
Does it mean that methods #getBuildSummary and #addBuildSummary are called
in different threads?
We changed a pure ArrayList with ConcurrentLinkedQueue in surefire:2.18.1 to
have deterministic behavior.
I guess we should do the same in maven core.
If you
I can fix it, but I guess it will be more improvements.
Karl, do we have more JIRA bugs regarding concurrency?
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-Commit-3b671d07340b002e13775883d09e7f7e0d9a3c49-tp5821660p5821675.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing
Hey Karl,
This is the list of concurrency issues in Maven.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5705?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20text%20~%20%22parallel%22
The funny thing with such of these issues is that they may not appear in
another environments and new may
An excellent operation is CAS (Compare and Swap/Set). This would mean that
POJO would have getters which return unmodifiableCollection, and new CAS
operations, for instance for the project dependencies.
The new method would be then:
public boolean casDependencies(CollectionArtifact original,
Don't worry Kristian, you did great job in parallel Maven exec, honestly I
don't say opposite!
As the CPUs speed up and disks as well, we really need parallal executions
in Maven core.
The thing how the discussion started in emails is that i wrote some local
changes and opened PR
Hi Kristian,
There had to be some kind of issue with collection if Karl made IdentityMap
synchronized.
Whatever collections are too open. As an example, this is not right and it
is not right in multithreading either:
request.setArtifactDependencies( project.getDependencyArtifacts() );
//common
JDK1.5 and 1.6 are unsupported anymore.
JDK 1.7 is still long alive and under maintenance.
The Java SE 7 API won't be taken back due to whatever JVM fault :))
The JDK 8 is alive too short.
I don't see any reason why the default Maven plugins have to go with awful
1.5 or 1.6.
We can freely
Hey Stephen, I have discarded my CloudBees account because they wanted my
bank card # to pay.
The free accounts do not seem to be free any longer.
I wanted to have Surefire on CloudBees, but now won't be possible, and I
really don't need top fast machines in Maven projects.
--
View this message
Hi Jason,
What are your plans with immutable objects. Would it be 3.2.6?
Last time we spoke it was in December, AFAI remember you was almost done
with them.
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-3-2-6-tp5825159p5825278.html
Sent from the Maven
Hi Norbert,
Definitely we should make notes about Maven 2 limitations.
After you have opened new PR in GitHub we would add a text in our docu.
I had a reason to use easytesting in Surefire855 IT - it's only IT, the main
code is not affected, just upgrade to JDK6. I can skip this test in JDK5, do
Jenkins machine Windows2 does not run.
I stopped surefire build and the machine stopped Maven IT3 build as well,
and then the machine was totally dead. Cannot connect via JNLP agent from
browser.
https://builds.apache.org/computer/windows2/
@Karl do you have rights to connect to the machine and
Failed again with OOM. I guess the machine self restarted before this run
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire-windows/773/org.apache.maven.surefire$surefire-integration-tests/testReport/org.apache.maven.surefire.its/XmlReporterRunTimeIT/testForkModeAlways/
--
View this message in
, but DSL languages is just only a fancy feature which does not solve our
major problem.
Basically the users claim that our MOJO plugin parameters should have:
+ different system properties
+ different default values
+ different data format
+ different handling of MOJO parameters
+ system
The initial problem was to @Inject user's implementation of client-api (some
dependency) in MOJO.
No problem if user implements our interfaces in a dependency for surefire
plugin - this may modify RunOrder feature for instance. Should work...
I am sure that some users will say that they have
This is a traditional problem with animal-sniffer-maven-plugin.
We had the same issue in JUnit project. Alrerady reported in JIRA
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANIMALSNIFFER-54
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANIMALSNIFFER-40
I would like to have the check-test goal or a new parameter.
It's
Bensons' question should not be forgotten and should be answered, but I would
like to remark on Kristian's code because I see OSGi services. I like the
osgi principle more than SPI. The SPI is calling client service impl, but
here client is calling osgi/surefire service. I know Maven is not on the
Maybe Jason can bring some light into this discussion.
Jason?
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Plugable-Softcoded-Customized-Maven-Plugins-tp5823365p5823611.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Kristian, i cannot imaging how will be customizing a dependency extension.
For instance each module should change the runOrder differently. Should I
then build tons of module extension for each project separately?
The extension code should be in src/test/java or another module, but both
cases
Hi Kristian,
I would like to override plexus artifacts, plexus-archiver and plexus-io,
in maven-war-plugin in order to speed up the packaging. Should I use the
beta version or 3.0 (Jan 10)?
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
Hi Robert,
It would be great to launch the JDeps within Javac compiler. Do you think it
would be possible for JDeps?
I like the way how my annotation processor (AP) is wired with the compiler.
I don't think that JDeps use annotations. I am not sure if compiler has
other kinds of processor
Is the MOJO object reused in plugin executions?
I want to make sure that if I store some data in the instance fields in my
MOJO object, next execution in a new MOJO object is created and properly
isolated from the context of previous execution.
Is it working like this in mvn core, or do we plan
Do we have plugin making the build only on committed modules?
I have TeamCity, but it does not matter; the important thing is that entire
reactor has many modules and it's waste to build all.
Hi Norbert,
I have updaated PR #82 with comment on GitHub.
The Ubuntu builds fail.
I would prefer keeping the test anyway.
Try to find a solution for Ubuntu as well; otherwise use JUnit assumption
statement
assumeThat( os, anyOf( is( Windows ), is( Ubuntu1 ) ) )
in the particular IT method,
Great job Kristian!
Where was the hotspot you gained the performance? Was it just the Java code
you add ZipEntries in the stream, or parallel writes in file, or this
improvement is specific on the hard drive? Does it apply to normal hard
drive or SSD better maybe?
--
View this message in
Hi Kristian,
Are you using NIO for writing big chunks?
Several years ago I made NIO1 measurements. I found that using 256KB
DirectByteBuffe on Win together with MappedByteBuffer/RandomAccessFile on
very large files 1GB got terribly fast throughput 400MB/s on ordinal hard
drive however the
guys, if there are any arguments, I can give you Word document with the jar
and test instructions.
I was testing this with one Russian guys on Unix and I was testing on
Windows. We presented this in a discussion at LinkedIn.
The NIO work nicely with big chunks you are about to write; But if you
Hoping this is not the end of surefire/failsafe plugin nor Maven.
Yeah, my impression from Maven is that it is static however introduced
regular practices, the users hit us with many requests.
For me it means that I try to handle the request immediately in JIRA and
resolve it. It gives me chance
Hi All,
We want to prepare an experimental release of maven-surefire-plugin
customizing the plugin behavior. Basically we want to uncover open API and
we expect a feedback from Maven users group.
We have received many configuration requests in this plugin which increased
JIRA issues.
We believe
Hi Igor,
I know that you are working on JDT and you probably want to synchronize your
activity with ours, but we don't have access API yet. Everything is in our
heads. We have only the standard surefire-api.
As we speak via email with Kristian, our current problem problem is the
injection and
Igor, can we join our visions and design together regarding compiler and
surefire ?
I guess we need to write a list of requirements. Later we will find possible
solutions for each + API.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Kristian, Igor,
I think i have found the way to inject custom objects into plugin execution
without SPI.
Look at this example
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GMAVENPLUS/Examples#Examples-ExecuteScripts
The user can write a trivial script launched like this
and write a RunOrder servis by
Is it possible to generate CHANGES.xml for Redmine automatically?
Similar to JIRA in reporting, all the issues downloaded from the issue
management server for particular release version.
Cheers
Adding dependencies to plugin in user's POM is old school for me, because
this is static code.
Look at Gradle they use script so it cannot be old school.
Ask the Maven Users group and give them two things to choose:
+ static plugin dependencies
+ dynamic extension via scripts
In my f*g company we
I have created INFRA job at ASF issues
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9151
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Slave-windows2-machine-crashed-tp5826082p5826294.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hard to understand what combination of multiple threads + bytecode
manipulation is interesting for you.
It looks like you want to make a Proxy over interfaces and throw an
exception if some other Thread is trying to make harmful operation, or so.
You know the core much better than me; Is it
I am interested in usage/documentation of new features which go with this
release.
Maybe some release notes.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Maven-3-3-0-Release-tp5828867p5829306.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This can be a candidate of Delta SNAPSHOT JAR.
Not much advantages with release version JAR, however useful in Release
Candidates RCx.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-JEP-238-Multi-Version-JAR-Files-tp5829748p5829837.html
Sent from the Maven
I am interested in usage/documentation of new features which go with this
release.
Where can I find it?
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Maven-3-3-1-Release-tp5829077p5829338.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@Robert
source=target=1.7 after M3.3.0? You mean 3.3.1?
A bit strange to make it in an incremental version since a user would not
imaging a fix version to break the system requirements in his CI regarding
JDK installation.
Currently the release notes for 3.2.6 is empty.
So if there's really
Usually the opensource projects change the major version, to 4.0.0, if
breaking the commpatibility with previous release.
So why we don't do that?
Listing features of Java SE 7 that we may use:
try-catch-resources
Strings in switch Statements
Catching Multiple Exceptions
@SafeVarargs
@Igor
How about Java SE 7 features?
If we change the compiler version, adapting compiler without introducing new
Java API features would not make any difference in 3.4.0.
Any thoughts?
--
View this message in context:
(Replying on this thread from my mail server does not work for me)
Usually the opensource projects change the major version, to 4.0.0, if
breaking the commpatibility with previous release.
So why we don't do that?
Listing features of Java SE 7 that we may use:
try-catch-resources
Strings in
Java SE 7 Features and Enhancements
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/jdk7-relnotes-418459.html
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/move-maven-core-to-java-7-tp5827988p5828456.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+ 1, Java SE 7
Looking for changes in our plugins as well.
For instance Java 7 introduced a new utility class java.util.Objects.
I found this very useful :
java.util.Objects.requireNonNull() in offensive programming in constructors
java.util.Objects.equals()
java.util.Objects.hashCode()
@Jason, the Maven performance and memory consumption is important for me as
well.
Can I assign this issue MNG-5669 to JIRA Issues to be reviewed for 3.x?
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/3-3-1-Memory-Usage-tp5829534p5830609.html
Sent from the Maven Developers
Hi Igor,
This would be cool imagination to fix it by myself, but last days I have
slept only few hours.
So I don't want to kill myself and thus better relax and sleep now longer.
I am going to fix issue in surefire, then introduce SPI and
surefire-extentions module in my Git branch and invite
I've got the configuration permissions in ASF Jenkins build system and
fixed maven-surefire-windows build. The problem was with OOM: perm size.
This avoided the problem with so big memory consumption:
-XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=50
(Compressed pointers should be already
This is also my problem with release plugin.
I am missing version schema in configuration /.
I guess BashShell code or some other generic approach because there might be
a lot of rules the users may require.
--
View this message in context:
Why the Maven core isn't plugable via SPI, for instance the class
ComparableVersion?
It's a class which does not need any Maven API and no extension plugin.
We may refuse spending our efforts on fixing debatable issues which would be
good for both parties Maven developers and users. Changing the
Kristian, you probably mean our utilies which switch implementations by java
version.
Yes, Java 8 is the lastest and greatest to have; But in my own company does
not have the confidence to use java 8 even after my trainings incorporating
Java 8 features into the projects.
BTW, I would like to
As you said, the SPI did not work well in multimodule project.
You tested SPI in Maven, so you know better than me :)
With JSR-269 with can use javax.inject:javax-inject annotations and we the
user can use non-default constructor. Imaging this in user, our processor is
sensitive only in
Is it coincidence if we accept SUREFIRE pull request ?
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/73
Do we plan OSGi Headers in Maven core?
Is there any side effect of these headers with Maven core or anything else?
Should we keep this PR open or close it?
Cheers,
Tibor
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Release-Plugin-version-2-5-2-tp5833185p5833227.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
? Where Maven 3.3.2 was lost -:)
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Maven-3-3-3-Release-tp5833488p5833567.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
+1 (non-binding)
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-ASF-Parent-POM-Version-17-tp5833724p5834044.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Karl,
I will rebuild surefire in the morning because other projecs are running now
in the evening and surefire needs enough CPU its alone in the agent.
If it fails again, I will open a ticket in INFRA.
--
View this message in context:
Would INFRA fix the Proxy Error on ASF Jenkins?
This build failed with network issue
Caused by: org.apache.maven.wagon.TransferFailedException: Failed to
transfer file:
It was maybe a short blackout in the morning because now the build does not
fail on deployment.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Deployment-on-Jenkins-Proxy-Error-tp5834485p5834542.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Currently surefire is dependent on snapshot version:
maven-shared-utils-0.8-SNAPSHOT.
When do we plane the release of 0.8 ?
Cheers
Tibor
+1 non-binding
Question: What happened with the gray block on the right hand side?
It contained few things which looked to me like a candidate of FAQ:
Get Maven 3.3.3
Get Maven Ant Tasks
Looking for Artifacts?
Looking for Repository Managers?
Looking for CI Servers?
Looking for Code Quality
Only users documentation.
https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-building-jdk14-on-jdk15.html
https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.html
In some previous release we removed jdk1.4 profile, compiled all modules
with jdk5 and checked signatures with animal-sniffer which
surefire-booter is very narrow, so from my side I can promis no Java 6+
features. Of course for me it's better if java compiler stops me from such
activities.
--
View this message in context:
+1 (non-binding)
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Fluido-Skin-Version-1-4-Take-2-tp5834652p5834839.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@Kristian, Andreas,
I think it makes sense to upgrade only javac to 1.7 in surefire plugins 3.0
running in main process, but the surefire providers including the booter are
quite isolated. This means they may stay on Java 5 until new Java feature is
required in the child processes as well.
For me
Thx Andreas and Karl.
I am not in hurry yet. Makes sense to wait a bit and release both
shared-utils and surefire.
Basically I proposed to release surefire by the end of May. This will be
next release after December.
The reason is that we fixed an issue of new feature and one bug of old
feature
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Add-Manfred-Moser-as-committer-tp5835313p5835359.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Feel free to use IDEA with Java SE - the open source projects can use it for
free AFAIK.
I have personal license with Java EE since 2013, so I am using IDEA in Maven
project with no issues.
@Jason if you need some feedback regarding Maven integration in IDEA, we can
talk about it.
--
View this
I thought the multi-versioned JAR had a different ambition, namely
delta-snapshots.
I guess that only a fragment of classes should be deployed in muti-version
JAR due to we have already deployed previous timestamp and thus current
snapshot is only aggregated from previous JARs.
In this case the
Please upgrade plugin versions
animal-sniffer-maven-plugin:1.14
The signature version in JDK 1.5 due to plugins however mvn core is 1.6.
TODO: The SUREFIRE POM should not override animal version.
maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15
buildnumber-maven-plugin:1.3
maven-doap-plugin:1.2
I don't know who
We need project components, project versions permissions from 2.) and issue
management from 1.).
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/IMPORTANT-NOTICE-Jira-migration-from-Codehaus-to-Apache-on-April-4th-tp5830262p5832593.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing
I am happy to discontinue mvn 2.2.1 in Surefire 3.0 asap.
It's a little bit tricky to make fine tuning of the build mvn 2.2.1, but
hopefully all surefire builds pass.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Time-to-remove-maven-2-2-1-builds-tp5832571p5832597.html
Sent
Hi Herve,
Can we please have a look at my account (Username:tibor17), especially
the profile because the Groups is jira-users instead of maven-developers.
Thx for answer.
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
I have pushed a proposal of Surefire Extensions in new branch
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/tree/s1
Added new module maven-surefire-extensions
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/tree/s1/maven-surefire-extensions
and extended the existing module
maven-surefire-common
Thx for moving SUREFIRE in https://issues.apache.org/jira.
I can login as tibor17, but I do not have rights to modify the issue
milestones as it seems.
The Apache login does not work for me.
Is the migration in progress, or should I create a new login?
--
View this message in context:
+1 Karl's page is much easier to read for me than the default page, and I
would say it less effects makes more. I like less gray color and bigger
fonts in blue like Karl has introduced.
I cannot say +/-1 on mobile phone. Perhaps we should check this as well.
Good Job!
--
View this message in
Nice Logo.
If we move the right hand side bar to the footer, we will get more space on
small display = 480 px.
Maybe some other page other than footer.
Is everything important in that bar?
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
Yes, too late, you did not take your laptop with you to kick the right person
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Still-missing-all-jira-permissions-tp5832029p5832106.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you Herve.
I am glad to hear that migration is in the right hands :)
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/IMPORTANT-NOTICE-Jira-migration-from-Codehaus-to-Apache-on-April-4th-tp5830262p5831532.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list
Hello guys,
I am not able to find https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE
I am not able to manage the issues at Codehaus either ASF.
What can we do about that?
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
After repackaging DOXIA class RenderingContext from package
doxia.sink.render to doxia.siterenderer I am not able to update DOXIA to
Version 1.6.
The surefire project depends on latest maven-reporting-impl:2.3 which needs
old class RenderingContex.
Has this solution, for instance another artifact
Can somebody experienced with Doxia tell me what's going on with the call
sink.lineBreak()?
It really looks like br is generated if and only if the previous line is
finished with \n, i.e., sink.text( line + \n );
Is it expected Doxia optimization or a bug?
I found this issue after I dig into
Hi Herve,
I have reworked the old code of surefire in pre.
Since now we will not print br after every new line.
Just printing plain text as it is in pre.
I will push the fix in the evening.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
I have to already release three projects at once. So i will add reporting.
Finally calling VOTE for 4 projects would not be any problem?
IMHO this saves the time for everyone.
maven-reporting-impl
maven-shared-utils
maven-verifier
surefire
--
View this message in context:
:-) Maybe later.
Thx Stephen for the advice.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Unable-to-Update-to-DOXIA-1-6-latest-tp5837197p5837331.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It's truth that we upgrade the JDK version for Maven distrib in 3.3/jdk7 and
3.2/jdk6 and not the compiler.
From the users perspective I would also suppose the compiler changed.
On the other side migrating all plugins takes time. Due to most of them
still depend on Maven API 2.2.1. It takes some
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Shared Utils, version 0.8
The release contains a number of bug fixes.
https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-shared-utils/
You should specify the version in your project's dependencies configuration:
plugin
Karl, I will start the release on late Sunday evening.
That's all we need from external dependencies to release Surefire plugins.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-of-maven-shared-utils-0-8-and-maven-verifier-1-6-tp5836620p5838130.html
Sent from
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Karl Heinz Marbaise, Kristian Rosenvold, Jason van Zyl, Hervé
Boutemy
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922version=12331401
There is still one issue left in JIRA:
I want to start Maven directly in Java and add more dependencies to a
plugin witout modifying POM file.
This means the Maven should run as Java object.
Is this hack possible?
Cheers
Tibor
Also have to use jdk 7 in deployment.
This post says that it's a kind of wildcard issue, I guess on host.
https://community.oracle.com/thread/2517881
I don't have JDK 6 on my system. Only 5 and 7.
The first time I deployed to Nexus the SSL version made problem and
therefore had to set property
Hi all,
We have a half day left to Vote. We need this artifact to continue with
others.
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Verifier-Component-version-1-6-tp5838266p5838477.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Verifier Component, version 1.6.
The release contains a number of bug fixes.
https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-shared-utils/
You should specify the version in your project's dependencies configuration:
plugin
I want to kindly ask the PMC team to mark maven-verifier-1.6 as Resolved in
JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED/
Please prepare new version 1.7 in JIRA for the next iteration.
--
View this message in context:
We need one more PMC to vote please.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Shared-Utils-version-0-8-tp5837727p5837952.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We need one more vote please.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Shared-Utils-version-0-8-tp5837727p5837889.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think it would not be difficult to dictate the SurefireProvider to use
specific JUnit runner or implement SurefireProvider by yourself and specify
then SPI class for it and list plugin dependency with the provider.
You can of course use Maven executions or just repeat the invoke().
We want to
There are plenty of requests like
streaming classes from socket into the plugin and executing
system properties in execution like you proposed
different test set or using class loader per test or TestNG groups per
exeution, but not the Maven execution
So I committed a proposal in a branch and we
1 - 100 of 1362 matches
Mail list logo
