Re: Building OO

Am 14.08.2017 um 03:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > >> Am 13.08.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >> >> :(. >> >> gmake version? >> >> --- >> $ gmake >> -bash: gmake: Kommando nicht gefunden. >> --- >>

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

This was based on my understanding that starting w/ 4.2.0, AOO required 10.9/Mavericks or greater. If not correct, could someone let me know :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: Building OO

On 15 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 15.08.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 10 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> I could now get past the gtest error by disabling unit tests >>> (--disable-unit-tests). >>> >>> Errors in udm and xml2cmp remain: >>> >>> make: *** No rule to make target >>>

Re: Opengrok

It's a regression, so I would assume applying for a blocker would be appropriate. > On Aug 15, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:46:29 -0700 > Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/,

Re: Building OO

Am 15.08.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 10 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> I could now get past the gtest error by disabling unit tests >> (--disable-unit-tests). >> >> Errors in udm and xml2cmp remain: >> >> make: *** No rule to make target >>

Opengrok

Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem before I go out of town for a few days starting on Thursday. I can use find and grep instead, but it takes a lot longer.

Re: Building OO

On 15 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 14.08.2017 um 03:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Matthias Seidel < >> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >> >>> Am 13.08.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >>> >>> :(. >>> >>> gmake version? >>> >>> --- >>> $ gmake >>>

Re: Opengrok

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:46:29 -0700 Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. > > This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem > before I go out of town for a few days starting on Thursday. I can use >

Re: Mozilla build tools version 3.0 are currently not compatible with AOO

Am 15.08.2017 um 14:37 schrieb Don Lewis: > The 3.0 version of the Mozilla build tools are not compatible with the > AOO build. The organization of the installed files is different, which > makes configure think that the installation is incomplete. I don't know > how easy this would be to fix,

Re: Opengrok

Hi Nicolas, we have a problem to reach the Opengrok instance of OpenOffice that is running in your network. Maybe you can help us to get this running again? Or someone else at Adfinis SyGroup? Thanks in advance for your help. Marcus Am 15.08.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

Re: Opengrok

Hi Marcus Please try again :) Just let me know, if I can help you with anything else! All the best and happy hacking, Nicolas On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > we have a problem to reach the Opengrok instance of OpenOffice that is > running in your network.

Re: Mozilla build tools version 3.0 are currently not compatible with AOO

Am 15.08.2017 um 14:37 schrieb Don Lewis: The 3.0 version of the Mozilla build tools are not compatible with the AOO build. The organization of the installed files is different, which makes configure think that the installation is incomplete. I don't know how easy this would be to fix, but the

Re: Opengrok

Hi Marcus :) I'll take care of it - update follows shorty. All the best, Nicolas On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > we have a problem to reach the Opengrok instance of OpenOffice that is > running in your network. Maybe you can help us to get this running >

Re: Opengrok

Looks good. I can reach the webpage and a search shows results. Thanks a lot for your very, very fast help. :-) Marcus Am 15.08.2017 um 21:08 schrieb Nicolas Christener: Hi Marcus Please try again :) Just let me know, if I can help you with anything else! All the best and happy hacking,

Re: Opengrok

Works for me now. Thanks. On 8/15/2017 12:14 PM, Marcus wrote: Looks good. I can reach the webpage and a search shows results. Thanks a lot for your very, very fast help. :-) Marcus Am 15.08.2017 um 21:08 schrieb Nicolas Christener: Hi Marcus Please try again :) Just let me know, if I

Re: java error when building AOO414 odk module

Yes, 4.1.4 still needs Java 7. If you don't need the SDK you can skip it with "--disable-odk". Am 16.08.2017 um 03:39 schrieb Don Lewis: > I just got a java error when building the odk module on 64-bit Windows > 10. The java version is Java SE Development Kit 8 Update 144. I didn't > run into

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Yes, I had the array activity in mind. I am suggesting to do the same for pointers and references. I am unsure which std methods are available in gcc version 4.1 or 4.4 however we could maybe in case of smart and weak pointers fall back to boost if not available in the compiler. By this we can

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

I have suggested a refactoring pass to make more use of STL structures instead of fixed size, unchecked arrays. Some security problem would be caught by array bounds checking. We have some new volunteers over on the recruitment mailing list. I think refactoring would be a good project for

Re: Opengrok

How does one select AOO414 ? Or add it? :) > On Aug 15, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. > > This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem > before I go out of town for a

java error when building AOO414 odk module

I just got a java error when building the odk module on 64-bit Windows 10. The java version is Java SE Development Kit 8 Update 144. I didn't run into this when building trunk. It's repeatable if I run "build --from odk", whether or not I clean the odk build directory first. mkdir.exe -p

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Good points! But we need to address the dependency aging anyways. Because modern system having difficulties with our code. We must develop a plan how we modernise the code. How about support by version: With 4.x we will support whatever we have today. 5.x will be on newer compiler dependency.

Re: no active help for most toolbars

> From: Mathias Röllig [mailto:mroellig.n...@gmx.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:26 AM > To: Development AOO > Subject: no active help for most toolbars > > Hello! > > Please open Writer and goto View → Toolbars. > Press [Shift]+[F1] for active help. > Only for “Hyperlink Bar” and

Re: Building OO

On 10 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > I could now get past the gtest error by disabling unit tests > (--disable-unit-tests). > > Errors in udm and xml2cmp remain: > > make: *** No rule to make target > '/cygdrive/e/slave14/aoo-win7/build/main/udm/source/inc/precomp.h > ', needed by >

Re: RC2: OLE problem?

> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] > Using 4.1.4 RC2 (on Xubuntu 16.04.03 64 bit) and Windows 7 > (in John_Ha's case) there seems to be a problem with OLE. > > If in Writer one uses /Insert /OLE Object / > OpenOffice 4.1.4 Formula with Create New checked, a math > formula will

AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

Just starting replaying w/ building 4.2.0 on macOS and ran into this: error: no type named 'unique_ptr' in namespace 'std' but the rub is that we for sure specify c++11 as we should: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang++ -arch x86_64

Mozilla build tools version 3.0 are currently not compatible with AOO

The 3.0 version of the Mozilla build tools are not compatible with the AOO build. The organization of the installed files is different, which makes configure think that the installation is incomplete. I don't know how easy this would be to fix, but the 2.x versions are smaller, so we should

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

Oh cool! Am 15. August 2017 15:45:05 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski : >I am looking at, for 4.2.0, having our target set to 10.9, instead >of 10.7, which helps a lot. > >> On Aug 15, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: >> >> Boost has name collision with c++11.

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

Boost has name collision with c++11. Switch the standard of. Then you have better chances I think. Am 15. August 2017 14:22:50 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski : >Just starting replaying w/ building 4.2.0 on macOS and ran into >this: > >error: no type named 'unique_ptr' in

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

I am looking at, for 4.2.0, having our target set to 10.9, instead of 10.7, which helps a lot. > On Aug 15, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > > Boost has name collision with c++11. > Switch the standard of. Then you have better chances I think. > > Am 15. August 2017