Re: Opengrok

Marcus wrote: I think the branches from the 4.x releases could be helpful, especially to see the differences between them. This means that we would need AOO400, AOO401, AOO410, AOO413, AOO414. Not all of them are in branches (historical reasons). Valid branches are listed here:

fisheye vs Opengrok

Hi! Answers inline Am Mittwoch, den 06.09.2017, 14:50 +1000 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Sorry to hijack the thread here sort of but … I Decouple the discussion :) > > https://fisheye.apache.org/changelog/openoffice he.org/changelog/openoffice> > > With all the talk of

Re: Opengrok

Sorry to hijack the thread here sort of but … https://fisheye.apache.org/changelog/openoffice With all the talk of OpenGrok, did anybody actually look closer to home? Gav… > On 6 Sep 2017, at 11:09 am, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

Fwd: FOSDEM Apache Developer Room ?

Hi - Is there any interest in OpenOffice participating with an Apache Developer Room at the 2018 FOSDEM? If so we should let Sharan know at d...@community.apache.org Regards, Dave > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Sharan Foga" > Subject: FOSDEM Apache Developer Room ?

Re: Opengrok

Am 05.09.2017 um 22:10 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:06:17 +0200 Marcus wrote: Am 04.09.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Nicolas Christener: See my comments inline, below: On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote: [...] your fix is working great. However,

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM Apache Developer Room ?

Dave Fisher wrote: Is there any interest in OpenOffice participating with an Apache Developer Room at the 2018 FOSDEM? I've taken care of submitting the request for the past few years and I can do it for this year too. So I'll take care of it. If so we should let Sharan know I'll let her

Re: Opengrok

Andrea Pescetti wrote: Other releases are simply a tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/tags/ Maybe too compact... I meant: if there is a way for OpenGrok to import tags too, those are the tags to be imported. And that would give us all releases, including those that don't have a

Re: Opengrok

Am 04.09.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Nicolas Christener: See my comments inline, below: On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote: [...] your fix is working great. However, the selection of branches is a bit old. Is there a chance to get newer branches into Opengrok? Sure :) great In SVN

Re: Opengrok

Hi, maybe it would be nice to have a small script that runs once a day that just removes all branches and set them up which it finds. It would remove the necessatity of manual maintenance. And I think it is fine for us if we see the new branch one day later. Not sure if your interface supports

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM Apache Developer Room ?

I would try to provide content for a room. There we have talks yes? I have no Idea about what I should talk, yet. Would be a talk on joining a huge historic Project like Open Office with almost no experience be a helpfull topic? Maybe we should have a talk where Open Office as a project is

Re: Opengrok

Would Opengrok be out of service during the "remove all branches" phase? If so, for how long? On 9/5/2017 3:04 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi, maybe it would be nice to have a small script that runs once a day that just removes all branches and set them up which it finds. It would remove the

Re: [Discussion] build tool

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to > add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on > Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me

Re: [Discussion] build tool

Am Dienstag, den 05.09.2017, 07:16 -0700 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > On 9/5/2017 7:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is > > difficult to > > add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for > > Windows on > >

Re: How to make a new include work

Did you manage to solve this? What did you do in the end? Thanks the Information! :-D Am Montag, den 28.08.2017, 12:18 -0700 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > Looks interesting. An include I needed from sfx2 worked just fine, > so > I'll make sc look the same way in that file. > > On 8/28/2017

Re: How to make a new include work

After some experiments, including manually copying a header file, I decided that approach was getting me into a mess. In effect the build system was warning me that I was breaking module boundaries. I found a cleaner solution. On 9/5/2017 6:55 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Did you manage to solve

[Discussion] build tool

Hello all, To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also if we want to have people develop on Windows. A good build environment

Re: [Discussion] build tool

On 9/5/2017 7:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also if we want to have people