Re: Presentation templates for ApacheCon NA 2013

Any update on these templates... I really want to be able to xfer my slides to the canonical template sooner rather than later ;) On Feb 8, 2013, at 3:32 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Saransh, Thanks very much for your help! As I mentioned below, you can refer to the Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate Compliance Costs

Thx for the discussion and the work. It is greatly appreciated. With that said, I still don't see the need or rationale for the ##For Developers section. Removing the last 2 paragraphs would go a long way in keeping the narrative closer to the kind of discussion and info that the ASF is known

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

> wrote: > > Am 02.09.2016 um 14:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> >> What is obvious is that the AOO project cannot support, at the present >> time, being an end-user focused effort. I would suggest we focus on not >> being one, but instead being a framework or libra

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

f this scene from Pulp Fiction (apologies for the language: I didn't write this. Blame "edgy" QT): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NlrgjgOHrw > On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Roberto Galoppini <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2016 3:29 PM, &qu

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

> On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > >> Patricia, we are still discussing. We are balancing reasons, >> advantages >> and disadvantages, for different solutions. There is no

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

BTW, can we drop private@ on this and simply continue the discussion on dev@? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

The issue, currently, is that the Mac OS X build requires, last I checked, an extremely old version of OSX, Xcode, et.al. No one has such a beast laying around. I have tried creating a VMware Fusion guest but it is difficult finding all the bits and pieces. There was some discussion on

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

gt; Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 2, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Dr. Michael Ste

Re: We believe in OpenOffice. We want to help.

Super super news! Thx!! > On Sep 3, 2016, at 4:49 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > > hard times for OpenOffice, but no unsolvable problems if we stand together. > > We, the team to the ProOO-Box (www.prooo-box.org), want the whole community > to assure that we will

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

Cool... We should get rid of that old page or put DEPRECATED in big letters. So have people built w/ 10.11 and Xcode 7.2.1 ? > On Sep 3, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> According to >> https://wiki.openof

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

al Affairs hat do you know anyone at Apple that > could help grant a special license from Apple? > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 3, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> Well, not sure i

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

on the above wiki page would be very, very useful. > On Sep 2, 2016, at 7:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The issue, currently, is that the Mac OS X build requires, last I >> checked, an extremely old version of OSX,

Re: The AOO build system

> On Sep 2, 2016, at 2:44 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > > 3. Regarding Mac in particular, I'll repeat this question from an earlier > thread: Does the ASF have Mac hardware for doing Mac builds, or are we > dependent solely on developer machines for that? > Is there

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

Please be aware that the board does not "stick its nose" into the daily operations of a project. The current status of AOO came to the boards attention via the required PMC reports as well as other communications. It was only because of that that the board got involved. > On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:57

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

Well, not sure if it is *allowed* or not, but VMware Fusion specifically allows for it. And it works. > On Sep 2, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > > That's unfortunate. And Apple doesn't allow running OSX under a VM on > another > OS do they? > > > Phil >

Re: Resigning from Apache OpenOffice

Thus makes me very, very sad. I hope that my comments are not a factor here. As anyone who had been following the hacker-news and LWN thread know, I am a supporter of AOO; I have been one since the start despite the slings and arrows directed towards me in being such. There was no intent to

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

I had an issue w/ epm and PackageMaker, which is hardcoded in configure to live in /Developer/ Also some other nits... Taking notes and will send patches in. > On Sep 3, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:17:

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

che project >>> not longer able to produce releases *may* end up being retired. >>> >>> Could we get writing help from Apache public relations staff? >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.comin

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

It appears to me that what "we" should do is to create a blog entry on blogs.a.o which provides more depth and detail in this whole kerfluffle. It could contain WHY the original [DISCUSS] thread was sent, that it was, in fact, a [DISCUSS] and basically to initiate some *thought* and not any sort

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

Not sure how this will come across... I am certain I will not be fully understood about this, anyway, this question deserves an answer. What has been obvious, from following the numerous threads in various places, as well as contributing to the 2 main ones, is just how much "damage" Rob Weir has

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

Dennis, thanks for opening up this conversation. As noted over the last few months, it has become obvious to the board that AOO has not been a healthy project for some time. Again, there are many, many reasons for this, and it doesn't help to go into them here and now. The simple fact is that we

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

Fine then. I'll drop it. It did deserve to be brought up though. > On Sep 7, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 06/09/2016 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> What has been obvious, from following the numerous threads in various >> places, as we

Re: Releasing OpenOffice 4.1.3 (reopening the AOO410 branch)

> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner > or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but with > more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

for a hardcoded path is beyond me. :) > On Sep 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:20:08PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I had an issue w/ epm and PackageMaker, which is hardcoded in >>

Re: Differentiate or Die

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Simos Xenitellis > wrote: > > > LibreOffice has a list of big ideas, called "crazy ideas", at > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas > These require big effort and it would be great if an office suite > would

dmake

Seeing that there is a dependency, still, on dmake, I've gone ahead and created https://github.com/jimjag/dmake based on what I've been using... Suggestions and patches welcome. Hoping we can use this to replace the apche-extras links. It's based on (https://github.com/mohawk2/dmake)

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113 > On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch. > >

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

his go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? > > 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off > additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open > to arguments. > > On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Didn't see

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one stops configure in its tracks. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > 4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the

Re: dmake

dable tarball is useful for the building process, the > sourceforge tarball seems to be working for me so far (it's my first build, > and it's still building, but it's gotten past the initial dmake > installation stage at least). > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:25 P

[CWiki] Account Whitelisting - Jim Jagielski (jimjag)

subj sez it all - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Differentiate or Die

sers, want. > On Sep 9, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Jorg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: > >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > >>> LibreOffice has a list of big ideas, called "crazy ideas", at >>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Develo

Re: Another LWN article

All done!! Thx!! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Another LWN article

Note that the LWN article is protected under a subscriber paywall. I'd like to followup but I'm not going to pay to repeat on that thread what I've said numerous times in numerous locations :) > On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > >

Re: Another LWN article

Even ignoring trolls is tiring work :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: dmake

> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > That would be challenging but useful then. For epm, as Ariel already > explained to you, we use a patched version so it's not a trivial task to > replace it, but probably it's feasible. > It looks like most of

Re: dmake

> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > > Note that we could also update the AOO patch to make epm get rid of the > PackageMaker, the patch already fixes the path: >

Re: dmake

Here's what I have so far: https://github.com/jimjag/epm/tree/aoo > On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On

Re: dmake

> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> That would be challenging but useful then. For epm, as Ariel already >> expla

Re: dmake

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Tarballs are at: >> https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases >> My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one >> "canonical

Re: dmake

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > epm is required and not under our control. In fact, epm 4.3 is out > and work much better for AOO since it removes the need for the > long-since deprecated PackageMaker app and instead uses

Re: 4.1.4 Release Manager?

Any real reason to name it 4.2.0 ? > On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > > I like this idea... 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 in the near-term, and then 4.2.0 in > early 2017. Feels like a good rhythm to aim for. > > Phil > > On Sep 15, 2016 15:14, "Marcus"

patched epm and AOO 4.2.x

. Considering that the package/installer in solenv knows about both patched and unpatched epms, I'd like us to consider baselining epm 4.3 (unpatched) for 4.2.x and later... It would be nice to be able to leverage untainted epm. > On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com&

Re: 4.1.4 Release Manager?

> On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Any real reason to name it 4.2.0 ? > > Two years of miscellaneous changes and fixes, a radically improved build > system, unit tests at build time, updates

Re: 4.1.3_release_blocker denied: [Issue 126622] Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX

I cannot recreate the bug on my setup, which is 10.11 with Java 7 and 8 installed. > On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:40 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 10/5/2016 2:32 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >> On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> Larry Gusaas wrote: Is this

Re: 4.1.3 building

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > > IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to > QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. If someone wants to > build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please

Re: 4.1.3 building

Once built and tested, how does one upload? I'm assuming the prepare-download-tree.sh in aoo-devtools?? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Sorry for the delay: Building OSX as we speak. A build the week-before-last had no regressions. > On Sep 25, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there > are binaries they can run. I can't start the

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

> On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement >>> for a release. >>> >>> A PMC member, to cast a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC1

+1 (binding) source testing: o Checked signature and hashes o Checked source formats contain identical files. o Built and tested en-US on OSX 10.11 binary testing: o Tested en-US app on OSX 10.11, 10.10 > On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >

Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.

> On Oct 9, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Peter Kovacs wrote: >> I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist >> involved? > > Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list >

Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1

We should ensure that AOO people join the keysignings @ ApacheCon > On Oct 8, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > This is not a blocker for the release (and moreover signature files are > explicitly allowed to be updated during the release vote if needed), but I >

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

If useful, I can replace my 64bit CentOS5 vm with a 32bit one. > On Sep 17, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 16/09/2016 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I'm in the process of bringing up a new CentOS5 system as we speak > > Good ne

Re: [PROPOSAL] Buildbot builds should include mor than en-US only

Where is this documented? I can see the ./configure line in the puppet files but we should also have this on a wiki someplace, right? > On Sep 19, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Marcus wrote: > > I remember that old times at Sun where we have done builds with more than > just en-US. >

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

I'll set one up in the next day. > On Sep 20, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 19/09/2016 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> If useful, I can replace my 64bit CentOS5 vm with a 32bit one. > > It would be useful (to have mor

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

Just a FYI that I now have 4 build VMs available that I will use: OSX 10.11/Xcode 7.3.1, Ubuntu 14.04/64bit, CentOS5.11/64bit and CentOS5.11/32bit. So far, successful builds on OSX and the 64bit Ubuntu and CentOS5 VMs; haven't tried the 32bit one yet.

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

I'm in the process of bringing up a new CentOS5 system as we speak. > On Sep 11, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> Volunteers to do the building? > > I can help with linux-64 builds based on the information shared by Ariel > about

Re: More Buildbot Information

Most excellent. Thx!! > On Sep 17, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Hi All, > > For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot > builds, I created a > new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update, >

Re: OpenOffice Access to the ASF's,Apple developer account

> Thank you for your support >> >> >> All the Best >> >> Peter >> >> >> On 11.10.2016 14:03, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 10/10/2016 22:34, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>>> On Oct 10

recruitment@

Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised... Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look like a dismal failure. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Stuff for 4.2.0

One of the things I'd like to work on in 4.2.x is some cleanups of the build system; I know there's already a page on it (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_System_Improvements) but my main goals are to (1) better handle OSX/MacOS and (2) get rid of the shell environment pollution required (at

Re: Writing up the release process

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a >>> conventional, co-located project I'd like to take

Re: Code signing available for OpenOffice

> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 9 October 2016 20:21:32 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: > The infrastructure

Re: Request to join back the PMC

++1! > On Nov 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > > Hi all > > In february 2015 I stepped back from the OpenOffice PMC. I stepped backi > because I have no more time to work on the project. Now I want to come back. > Let me know, if this is ok or not. > >

Re: Build Problems on Mac

My focus has been on 4.1.x and 4.1.4 and not so much on trunk lately... My assumption is that we will be releasing a 4.1.4 in relatively "short" order. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: Build Problems on Mac

e/display/OOOUSERS/Releases > > At least we have a release manager, do we? > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 09.01.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> My focus has been on 4.1.x and 4.1.4 and not so much on >> trunk lately... My assumption is that

Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4)

My AOO 4.1.4 builds are ready for upload. Configure settings were: LANGS="ast bg ca ca-XR ca-XV cs da de el en-GB en-US es eu fi fr gd gl he hi hu it ja kid km ko lt nb nl pl pt pt-BR ru sk sl sr sv ta th tr vi zh-CN zh-TW" ./configure \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d

Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4)

> On Mar 27, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > My AOO 4.1.4 builds are ready for upload. > Just need a location to drop 'em off at :) - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4)

I can have this complete and uploaded by this Monday if that's OK... I am currently traveling and my AOO build system isn't accessible from where I am. > On Mar 22, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Raphael

Re: Please someone release 4.2.0 (or something else ...)

I can see how 4.2.0-dev builds/works on OSX/macOS... > On Mar 14, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 13.03.2017 um 23:56 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 12/03/2017 Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> It seems like the imminent release of 4.1.4 got stuck and it is

Re: Please someone release 4.2.0 (or something else ...)

To be clear, there doesn't seem to be a specific 4.2.0 branch... So will be looking at trunk/HEAD > On Mar 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > I can see how 4.2.0-dev builds/works on OSX/macOS... > >> On Mar 14, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Matth

Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4)

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > > > Is there someone who can do Mac OS X? > As mentioned previously, I can. In fact, I have, but it was not a full-distclean rebuild, so will do again, just to make sure. Once done, will upload. Suggested

Re: Buildbots page

How can I upload my macOS build there?? > On Apr 1, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > If no one has objections I would make : > > https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds-test.html > > live tomorrow and ask Infra to remove the script, page and

Re: I want to test AOO 4.1.4 again

Latest test releases are available at: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/r1803698/ Assuming these test OK, svn will be updated, and official tag and roll will happen. Let me know if your lang build isn't avail. - To

Re: Prepare for 4.1.4 RC1...

e I just came home > from work... ;-) > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 03.08.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Release candidate builds for 4.1.4 RC1 are being uploaded as we speak. >> Once complete I will be calling for an official test and vote >> on these a

Prepare for 4.1.4 RC1...

Release candidate builds for 4.1.4 RC1 are being uploaded as we speak. Once complete I will be calling for an official test and vote on these artifacts. NOTE: Current builds are Linux 32bit, Linux 64bit and macOS/OSX. We are still waiting on Windows builds...

Expat 2.2.3 and Windows woes

Hrm. Matthias is reporting that with expat 2.2.3, that Windows is no longer building Some ideas: o expat 2.2.3 requires c99 o expat 2.2.3 requires loadlibrary.obj be built and it doesn't look like our expat-2.2.3.patch file, which creates makefile.mk does that. Can anyone check

Re: Prepare for 4.1.4 RC1...

+1 > On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 08/03/2017 08:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Release candidate builds for 4.1.4 RC1 are being uploaded as we speak. >> Once complete I will be calling for an official test and vote

Re: Expat 2.2.3 and Windows woes

n resume the build > by running: > > build --from expat > > --- > > > Am 03.08.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Hrm. Matthias is reporting that with expat 2.2.3, that Windows is >> no longer building >> >> Some ideas: >> >> o

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

This was based on my understanding that starting w/ 4.2.0, AOO required 10.9/Mavericks or greater. If not correct, could someone let me know :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: Opengrok

It's a regression, so I would assume applying for a blocker would be appropriate. > On Aug 15, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:46:29 -0700 > Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/,

Re: Opengrok

How does one select AOO414 ? Or add it? :) > On Aug 15, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. > > This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem > before I go out of town for a

Re: Windows build woes

I wonder if it's because I'm on Win7, Home Premium. The list of installed s/w looks correct: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/aoobuilder-sw.png - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

Just starting replaying w/ building 4.2.0 on macOS and ran into this: error: no type named 'unique_ptr' in namespace 'std' but the rub is that we for sure specify c++11 as we should: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang++ -arch x86_64

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

t; Am 15. August 2017 14:22:50 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >> Just starting replaying w/ building 4.2.0 on macOS and ran into >> this: >> >> error: no type named 'unique_ptr' in namespace 'std' >> >> but the rub is that we for sure s

Re: Windows build woes

I've tried reinstalling, putting stuff in different locations, etc... I just cannot get aoo-414 building on my windows7 VM. I am following the step-by-step guide to the letter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Windows build woes

Considering that the build system for OO depends on pollution, oops, I mean *population* of the environment, I just wonder if that may be an issue. Are you using the default bash* startup scripts? Any modifications? That sort of thing?

Re: Windows build woes

Can you provide what 'echo $PATH' shows before autoconf and after the sourcing of winenv.set.sh? tia! > On Aug 12, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Am 12.08.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Considering that the bui

Re: Windows build woes

t; interpretation is that whatever is supposed to make sure all dependencies are > satisfied before building a module does not quite work right. Sooner or > later, everything that is needed does get built, and the build can proceed. > > > On 8/11/2017 7:30 AM, Jim Jagielski

[ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.4 RC2

://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC2/ Cheers! -- Jim Jagielski On behalf of the Apache OpenOffice Project - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS

> On Aug 17, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 16/08/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The build warnings and errors using any SDK older than 10.9 on trunk. > > Is this a build requirement or will it affect end users too? I mean, does &

Re: DOC file not opening on 4.1.4

Thanks! What platform build is this on? On 2017-08-10 07:27, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > Forum volunteer John_Ha has sent me a DOC file that will open with 4.1.3 (and > AbiWord) but gives a "Read-Error: This is not a WinWord 97 file" error on > 4.1.4 RC1. A quick inspection

Re: Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

Full set of Linux64 RPMs are uploaded... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

:) I can, but should I wait until we have some additional 4.1.4 backports folded in? > On Jul 5, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Great! > > DEBs coming up next? ;-) > > > Am 05.07.2017 um 15:42 schrieb Jim Jagie

Re: Openoffice installation on Mac PC

BTW, if we do have some signing capability suitable for the App Store, could someone share that info for me for my AOO 4.1.4 builds. tia. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

A sampling has been uploaded to: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Cheers!. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: ASF logo in Splash Screen?

FWIW: /me like > On Apr 22, 2017, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.04.2017 um 19:09 schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> >> On 04/17/2017 12:47 AM, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 15.04.2017 um 18:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: For those who want to have a look, take:

Re: Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

as.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Great! > > Did you also build 4.2.0 recently? > > I would like to know if the new setup icon is OK? > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 27.04.2017 um 14:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> A sampling has been uploaded to: >> &g

Re: Tips on uploading builds for 4.1.4-RC

> On Aug 5, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> My prep scripts are now on devtools/release-scripts. > > Thanks, one things less to redo next time! > >>> ## 3. How is the source code obtained? >

Re: Expat 2.2.3 and Windows woes

isc/logs/expat.txt > > > Am 05.08.2017 um 00:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Grr... >> >> 1 module(s): >> expat >> need(s) to be rebuilt >> >> Reason(s): >> >> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >> /cygdrive/e/slav

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >