Re: Documentation needs
On 2/17/2017 4:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Joe wrote: >> I've looked at the wiki. The documents there are all pretty old. >> They may be ok, but they were written for older versions of the software. > > Your real starting point is here: > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide > > This is for the current (4.1.x) version and is being written from > scratch. Many of the pages need reviewing, some still need to be > written. There are active (to be precise: willing to be active) > volunteers on the documentation mailing list, but experience shows that > they can only be activated with specific tasks. So I suggest that you > review/edit some pages for a start; if you need an account, just ask here. > > Regards, > Andrea. Forwarding to OP who is not subscribed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Documentation needs
Joe wrote: I've looked at the wiki. The documents there are all pretty old. They may be ok, but they were written for older versions of the software. Your real starting point is here: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide This is for the current (4.1.x) version and is being written from scratch. Many of the pages need reviewing, some still need to be written. There are active (to be precise: willing to be active) volunteers on the documentation mailing list, but experience shows that they can only be activated with specific tasks. So I suggest that you review/edit some pages for a start; if you need an account, just ask here. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Documentation needs
Hi Patricia, I'm not sure if I should be following up on any of the bits and pieces below. I could go through the process of introducing myself and getting an account, but it also seems like perhaps the group is inactive. I've looked at the wiki. The documents there are all pretty old. They may be ok, but they were written for older versions of the software. I don't think I'm in a position to "coordinate the work ". Thoughts? Joe Patricia Shanahanwrote: >On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> Hello, >> >>> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] >> >>> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with >>> writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The >>> doc@ list >>> seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. >>> >>> What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or >>> documentation? >> >> I think the easiest way is to use the wiki and coordinate the work. Start >> here: >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation >> >> Previously, much was coordinated by odf-autors: >> http://www.odfauthors.org/ >> >> At the moment, I do not know how to create an account in the Wiki, _maybe >> someone else can help_? >> >> Editing the web pages is done with cms, you have to have an account, which >> you get when you are committer: >> >> >> The German language documentation is _actively_ maintained by the team of >> the ProOO-Box, see: >> http://prooo-box.org/live/seiten/dokumentation.html >> (see also the site: https://www.openoffice.org/de/doc/index.html but the >> documents there are not up-to-date) > >Maybe one place to start on the English documentation would be to pick >up German changes, machine translate, and then polish the result, if the >licensing permits? > >> Perhaps one can say more precisely, documentation is not my particular >> workspace. > >I think the real problem is that currently documentation is not in >anybody's workspace. We have at least one volunteer who is interested, >but needs help getting started. > >
Re: Documentation needs
On 02/15/2017 06:07 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ. This is where it would be great if Solr, in conjunction with some of the other technologies that are being developed by The Apache Software Foundation could crawl through the various mailing lists, forums, etc, and create a list of the 1,000 or so most commonly asked questions, sorted by frequency of being asked. ### >From a strictly personal perspective, I think that it will be simpler, and easier to write new guides from scratch, than trying to update the existing guides. (FWIW, I've said the same thing about guides for LibO 5.3.(^1)) LibO and AOo on the desktop are at the point where the differences between them are such, that documentation written for one, is inapplicable to the other. For LibO, EO, and AnO on the Android platform, the differences between them are so much greater, that what works for one, is completely inapplicable to the other two. jonathon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Documentation needs
On 2/15/2017 12:43 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > >> [knmc] >> I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box >> page above, it >> appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors >> Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license. >> [/knmc] > > Yes. > > Specifically, the material is double-licensed, either GPL 3 (or later > version) or/and CC BY 3.0 (or later version). > > > Jörg > Jorg; Thank you for the additional information. This could pose problems depending on the sense of the community. The community made a conscious choice not to use the Version 3 documentation as a basis as they felt at the time that we needed to have the Documentation under the ALV2. I felt at the time and still do that the need for good documentation outweighed the arguments for basing them on the ALV2, but the discussion should be broached again to understand what the current sense of the community would be. Regards Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Documentation needs
I learned on Fosdem from the pro documenters to stick to # use case oriented approach. ALWAYS. # never start with index # set the possibility to provide feedback as low as possible. # and only describe how it is done # don't use insiders. >From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ. And then continue what users ask on Facebook or in Forums. And link that back. Also to take Forum answers and put them into a nice way would be a good approach. For technical stuff I think we should tacle this, from tech to tech. For the German comments you could use Google translate or use our translation bug. I lost sight of it thought :) My 2 cents Peter Jörg Schmidtschrieb am Mi., 15. Feb. 2017, 18:44: > > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > > > [knmc] > > I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box > > page above, it > > appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors > > Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license. > > [/knmc] > > Yes. > > Specifically, the material is double-licensed, either GPL 3 (or later > version) or/and CC BY 3.0 (or later version). > > > Jörg > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu verhandeln.
Re: Documentation needs
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > [knmc] > I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box > page above, it > appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors > Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license. > [/knmc] Yes. Specifically, the material is double-licensed, either GPL 3 (or later version) or/and CC BY 3.0 (or later version). Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Documentation needs
On 2/15/2017 9:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> Hello, >> >>> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] >> >>> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with >>> writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The >>> doc@ list >>> seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. >>> >>> What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or >>> documentation? >> >> I think the easiest way is to use the wiki and coordinate the work. >> Start here: >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation >> >> Previously, much was coordinated by odf-autors: >> http://www.odfauthors.org/ >> >> At the moment, I do not know how to create an account in the Wiki, >> _maybe someone else can help_? >> [knmc] Creating of mwiki accounts must be done by an admin or someone with syop privileges. Self registration was turned off 4+ years ago as an anti-spam measure. To have an mwiki account created send an email to dev@ with your preferred user name and you will me notified by email when the account has been created. {/knmc] >> Editing the web pages is done with cms, you have to have an account, >> which you get when you are committer: [knmc] The cms can also be used by non-committers to edit the pages but they must be reviewed and committed by a committer. For more information see the excellent YouTube video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fvg1pfHLhE [/knmc] >> >> >> The German language documentation is _actively_ maintained by the team >> of the ProOO-Box, see: >> http://prooo-box.org/live/seiten/dokumentation.html >> (see also the site: https://www.openoffice.org/de/doc/index.html but >> the documents there are not up-to-date) > > Maybe one place to start on the English documentation would be to pick > up German changes, machine translate, and then polish the result, if the > licensing permits? [knmc] I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box page above, it appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license. [/knmc] > >> Perhaps one can say more precisely, documentation is not my particular >> workspace. > > I think the real problem is that currently documentation is not in > anybody's workspace. We have at least one volunteer who is interested, > but needs help getting started. [knmc] The real problem is that to date we have not had contributors with detailed knowledge of technical writing to act as mentors to new volunteers and to do detailed copy editing to produce professional documentation. I beat my head against this brick wall for 4 years and my considered opinion is that unless this can be corrected good user documentation will continue to be a difficult hurdle to overcome. [/knmc] Regards Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Documentation needs
Hi Patricia, A good starting point would be our SDK (HTML documentation). http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/odk/ I only wanted to update the Apache logo for the HTML docs but then I found some typos, outdated links (e.g. to SUN Java) and still some OpenOffice.org branding. I already made 2 commits but there is definitely more to do: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1783028 https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1783109 Kind regards, Matthias Am 15.02.2017 um 00:27 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with > writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list > seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. > > What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or > documentation? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Documentation needs
Hi all Am .02.2017, 15:20 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or documentation? I think the easiest way is to use the wiki and coordinate the work. Start here: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation Previously, much was coordinated by odf-autors: http://www.odfauthors.org/ At the moment, I do not know how to create an account in the Wiki, _maybe someone else can help_? Editing the web pages is done with cms, you have to have an account, which you get when you are committer: The German language documentation is _actively_ maintained by the team of the ProOO-Box, see: http://prooo-box.org/live/seiten/dokumentation.html (see also the site: https://www.openoffice.org/de/doc/index.html but the documents there are not up-to-date) Maybe one place to start on the English documentation would be to pick up German changes, machine translate, and then polish the result, if the licensing permits? Perhaps one can say more precisely, documentation is not my particular workspace. I think the real problem is that currently documentation is not in anybody's workspace. We have at least one volunteer who is interested, but needs help getting started. I asked on the Facebook Page for help. We will see, whats the reaction. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Mein Blog: https://raphaelbircher.blogspot.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Documentation needs
On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or documentation? I think the easiest way is to use the wiki and coordinate the work. Start here: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation Previously, much was coordinated by odf-autors: http://www.odfauthors.org/ At the moment, I do not know how to create an account in the Wiki, _maybe someone else can help_? Editing the web pages is done with cms, you have to have an account, which you get when you are committer: The German language documentation is _actively_ maintained by the team of the ProOO-Box, see: http://prooo-box.org/live/seiten/dokumentation.html (see also the site: https://www.openoffice.org/de/doc/index.html but the documents there are not up-to-date) Maybe one place to start on the English documentation would be to pick up German changes, machine translate, and then polish the result, if the licensing permits? Perhaps one can say more precisely, documentation is not my particular workspace. I think the real problem is that currently documentation is not in anybody's workspace. We have at least one volunteer who is interested, but needs help getting started. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Documentation needs
Hello, > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with > writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The > doc@ list > seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year. > > What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or > documentation? I think the easiest way is to use the wiki and coordinate the work. Start here: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation Previously, much was coordinated by odf-autors: http://www.odfauthors.org/ At the moment, I do not know how to create an account in the Wiki, _maybe someone else can help_? Editing the web pages is done with cms, you have to have an account, which you get when you are committer: The German language documentation is _actively_ maintained by the team of the ProOO-Box, see: http://prooo-box.org/live/seiten/dokumentation.html (see also the site: https://www.openoffice.org/de/doc/index.html but the documents there are not up-to-date) Perhaps one can say more precisely, documentation is not my particular workspace. greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org