Somewhat related, would it make sense to add a function like stx-e that would
be like (if (syntax? stx) (syntax-e stx) stx) to syntax/stx?
On Feb 17, 2015, at 2:18 AM, Alexis King wrote:
> I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have a
> (zip ...) function in rac
(I was thinking dissertations.)
On Feb 17, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Burton wrote:
> Matthias, when you say "At some point TR will move on," what do you mean by
> that? I, for one, would like to see TR more tightly integrated with regular
> racket a la progressive types, rather than branching o
Matthias, when you say "At some point TR will move on," what do you mean by
that? I, for one, would like to see TR more tightly integrated with regular
racket a la progressive types, rather than branching off into its own arena.
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> At som
Yes, that's true.
Robby
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
> wrote:
>> 2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler :
>>> I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
>>> adding aliases.
>>
>> A
At some point TR will move on, and perhaps the time has come.
On Feb 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> I don't think we should add functions to TR that are not in Racket and
> that are not clearly type-related (e.g., `cast`).
>
> I also like Jens's solution better. Education v
I don't think we should add functions to TR that are not in Racket and
that are not clearly type-related (e.g., `cast`).
I also like Jens's solution better. Education vs crutches.
Vincent
At Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:39:16 -0500,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> I'd add them to Typed Racket. That's
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
> adding aliases.
>
> Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
> write an essay specifically aimed there?
>
> - Step 1: use variables.
> - Step
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> 2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler :
>> I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
>> adding aliases.
>
> A alternative: Added the word zip to the documentation index,
> link it to map and have an exampl
2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler :
> I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
> adding aliases.
A alternative: Added the word zip to the documentation index,
link it to map and have an example where in (map list ...) is used.
Also: Isn't zip in srfi/1 ?
/Jen
I'd add them to Typed Racket. That's what Haskellians are most likely to
explore and when they find them, it's a good thing (tm). -- Matthias
On Feb 17, 2015, at 2:18 AM, Alexis King wrote:
> I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have a
> (zip ...) function
I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.
Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
write an essay specifically aimed there?
- Step 1: use variables.
- Step 2: here are `for` loops!
;)
Robby
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:18 A
I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have a
(zip ...) function in racket/list that would be equivalent to (map list ...).
Users coming from a Haskell background might even find it useful to have a
zip-with function that is simply an alias for map. Admittedly, th
12 matches
Mail list logo
