Andreas Fink wrote:
Kannel should send the originator in the format it was submitted.
I dont think adding another parameter is the right way to solve this.
yep, I disagree also in adding more SMSC module specific config
directives. It's already complicated enough.
So I'd vote -1 for this.
Andreas Fink wrote:
I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 it arrives
on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as +123. So is this not
good enough??
agreed! I don't see any reason for issue either.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arne K. Haaje wrote:
I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123
it arrives on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as
+123. So is this not good enough??
Not it looks like the operators MC adds the + sign even when sending
just 123.
hmm,
On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 08:33 Uhr, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
Hi,
I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask,
should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number
of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and
Andreas Fink wrote:
On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 08:33 Uhr, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
Hi,
I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to
ask,
should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the
number
of the sender? and if so,
In case anybody is interested, here is a short discussion Andreas Fink
and I had about my patch and its usability (or lack of).
--
Med vennlig hilsen,
Eurobate ASA
Arne K. Haaje
Senior Network Engineer
Eurobate ASA -
Hi all,
Included is a patch that allows shortnumbers to be printed on the
receivers phone without prepending the pluss sign. This also make it
easy for the receiver to reply directly to the message. This can be very
convenient in services for chat, games, dating etc.
I have added a parameter
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 06:40 Uhr, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
Hi all,
Included is a patch that allows shortnumbers to be printed on the receivers phone without prepending the pluss sign. This also make it easy for the receiver to reply directly to the message. This can be very convenient in
Hi,
I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask,
should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number
of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and
'from' number? because, for example, SMPP (if operator permits) allows
