Nisan Bloch wrote:
At 11:37 AM 2/25/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Kalle Marjola wrote:
That's why I published them, altought I knew that some things are a bit
too radical. As we have no resources to do any development on it right
now, I hope that you can scavenge useful things out
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Nisan Bloch wrote:
I think rolling NMGW into Kannel would be worthwhile. At the same time come
up with a combined bbox+smsbox version, with the same HTTP interface. In
addition an API to build XXXboxs with. Smsbox would be the first such app
and
Kalle Marjola wrote:
That's why I published them, altought I knew that some things are a bit
too radical. As we have no resources to do any development on it right
now, I hope that you can scavenge useful things out from it and this way
improve the Kannel project.
yep, +1 :) that's what we
At 11:37 AM 2/25/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Kalle Marjola wrote:
That's why I published them, altought I knew that some things are a bit
too radical. As we have no resources to do any development on it right
now, I hope that you can scavenge useful things out from it and this way
improve the
Nisan Bloch wrote:
I think rolling NMGW into Kannel would be worthwhile. At the same time come
up with a combined bbox+smsbox version, with the same HTTP interface. In
addition an API to build XXXboxs with. Smsbox would be the first such app
and maybe the smppbox and emibox that have been
Nisan Bloch wrote:
At 10:29 AM 2/20/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
ok, as all of you kick-ass with benchmark figures, I'll do too ;))
The max. throughput we reached with a Dell PowerEdge 2x CPU (1.2 GHz)
Linux 2.4 Kernel in a fakesmsc - bearerbox - smsbox chain was
approx. 2400 msg/sec.
Hi
We have in total 14 connections to different operators SMSC in
thee different countryes and in short term we have reached about
150-200 msg/sec.
Illimar
I think my peak was in a campaign that was delayed and then I
needed every resource available to do it and I had something
like
I once stress tested stand-alone bearerbox. (Standalone meaning I was
using
smsboxes that did not do any fetch, but returned a standard text message
instead.) I got value 1200 msg/s and must use ~20 smsboxes before I
reached
100 % cpu utilisation. Cpu was AMD Athlon, 800 MHz.
Aarno
On
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Aarno Syvänen wrote:
I once stress tested stand-alone bearerbox. (Standalone meaning I was
using
smsboxes that did not do any fetch, but returned a standard text message
instead.) I got value 1200 msg/s and must use ~20 smsboxes before I
reached 100 % cpu utilisation.
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Not 100% true ;) We run one logical link per bearerbox (e.g. 3 sessions for
one offerer). For now I have not seen any performance bottleneck issues with
bearerbox. Some of our bearerboxes running with ~60sms/sec. Now you will ask,
why multiple bearerboxes ;) It's
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
I once stress tested stand-alone bearerbox. (Standalone meaning I was
using
smsboxes that did not do any fetch, but returned a standard text message
instead.) I got value 1200 msg/s and must use ~20 smsboxes before I
reached
100 % cpu utilisation. Cpu was AMD Athlon,
Kalle Marjola wrote:
The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed if
it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :]
yes, in some sense. But that would mean you have an permanent(!) input
stream of 100-200 msg/sec. and this is very unlikely.
Of course
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 09:35 schrieb Kalle Marjola:
The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed if
it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :]
I have sent patch to the list for avoiding this issue , but unfortunately it was not
accepted ;(
I
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 09:35 schrieb Kalle Marjola:
The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed if
it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :]
I have sent patch to the list for avoiding this issue , but
On Donnerstag, Februar 20, 2003, at 10:32 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Kalle Marjola wrote:
The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed if
it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :]
yes, in some sense. But that would mean you have an permanent(!) input
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 11:44 schrieb Stipe Tolj:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 09:35 schrieb Kalle Marjola:
The current Kannel is, however, made in that way that it gets trashed
if it receives messages faster than it can handle, so beware :]
I have
At 10:20 AM 2/20/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
that's true. That's why we implemented the 'include = file' feature
for the config file handling, so you can structurize the global config
file for your own needs.
It's like you setup an apache config for every VHost you'd
At 10:29 AM 2/20/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
ok, as all of you kick-ass with benchmark figures, I'll do too ;))
The max. throughput we reached with a Dell PowerEdge 2x CPU (1.2 GHz)
Linux 2.4 Kernel in a fakesmsc - bearerbox - smsbox chain was
approx. 2400 msg/sec.
We had also MO values while
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Asif Ali wrote:
hello all,
i am new to this mailing list, i want to know if
anybody's working on multi-bearer box architecture or
there are any plans as it was identified as one of the
key performance bottleneck issues, also the
persistance of
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
We have only one bearerbox and one smsbox for 16 connections and alot of
messages per day, and sometimes I'm scared when I enable a 50msg/sec on one of
those connections for doing mass spam but then, while I'm sending them, I'm
watching and testing the other
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What was the highest peak (msg/sec.) you had in the bearerbox (over
all connections)?
I think my peak was in a campaign that was delayed and then I needed every
resource available to do it and I had something like 50+15+5+3+2+several 1
msg/sec connections,
Hi,
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 11:03, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Asif Ali wrote:
hello all,
i am new to this mailing list, i want to know if
anybody's working on multi-bearer box architecture or
there are any plans as it was identified as one of the
key performance bottleneck issues, also
22 matches
Mail list logo
