[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2024-05-17 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing bdii-6.0.1-1.el7 tio-3.3-1.el7 Details about builds: bdii-6.0.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-63b74d8dae) The Berkeley Database

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-5adff944cd has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-b4a4e97be4 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2249161] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249161 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2024-05-17 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e29578804c suricata-6.0.19-1.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-862672cc3e perl-Email-MIME-1.954-1.el9 The following builds

Batch upgrade of PETSc Sundials MUMPS libraries

2024-05-17 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. I'm preparing (1) following updates for Fedora 41: PETSc-3.21.1 (https://petsc.org/release/changes/321/) MUMPS-5.7.1 (https://mumps-solver.org/index.php?page=dwnld#cl) Sundials-7.0.0 (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v7.0.0) All dependent packages can be rebuilt with

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Owen Taylor
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:50 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically > numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and > the latter %autopatch which is supposed to apply patches >= 2 simply has > nothing to do,

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2024-05-17 Thread blackwell via devel
Hi all, I have a PR for xmlcopyeditor. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xmlcopyeditor/pull-request/3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870203 Jason Blackwell On 5/16/24 19:27, Tim Orling wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: Hi all, Today,

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 10:32 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Kevin Kofler via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-16 22:39:00: > > Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically > > > numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the

Re: New Fedora Planet

2024-05-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:42:12AM GMT, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:16:17PM -0300, Pedro Moura wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on > > fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift.

[Bug 2280993] New: perl-Log-Contextual-0.009000 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280993 Bug ID: 2280993 Summary: perl-Log-Contextual-0.009000 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Contextual Keywords: FutureFeature,

Intention to retire mlocate

2024-05-17 Thread Michal Sekletar
Hi everyone, We have had a plocate as a drop-in replacement for mlocate for quite a while now. My intention is to retire the mlocate package next week in order to prevent duplication and so that we can focus only on plocate going forward. Have a nice weekend, Michal --

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
This meeting is canceled due to lack of agenda. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-05-17 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source:

[Bug 2280643] Upgrade perl-Devel-Cover to 1.42

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280643 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-Cover-1.42-1.fc4

[Bug 2280643] Upgrade perl-Devel-Cover to 1.42

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280643 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

2024-05-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > > > > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change > > > I already filed? I

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-17 Thread Paul Howarth
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:32:24 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Oh, this is embarrasing. I added two patches but they didn't get > > applied because %setup not %autosetup. :( > > I'll push a fixed build in a moment. Sorry for breaking the builds. > > > >

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240517.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2024-05-17 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240517.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:19:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:43:22AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 + > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240517.n.0 changes

2024-05-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240516.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240517.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:17 Upgraded packages: 30 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.86 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 2251190] Upgrade perl-V to 0.19

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251190 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

Major version update of reuse tool (3.0.2) incoming

2024-05-17 Thread Jan Staněk
Hello all! As of today, I have picked up maintenance of FSFE's reuse tool [1]. I have a major update in progress, which IIRC includes changes on how the CLI should be used. I do not know if any Fedora tooling uses this tool, but in case it does, consider this your heads-up. The update should

[Bug 2251190] Upgrade perl-V to 0.19

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251190 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-11c4c86c65 (perl-V-0.19-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-11c4c86c65 -- You are receiving this mail because:

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 5/17/24 15:53, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Michael J Gruber wrote: %patchlist and %auto* should just go away, or at least banned from Fedora by a git hook rejecting such specfiles. We also have unnumbered patch source definition lines, don't we? IIRC, unnumbered Source: or Patch: just

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Michael J Gruber wrote: >> %patchlist and %auto* should just go away, or at least banned from Fedora >> by a git hook rejecting such specfiles. > > We also have unnumbered patch source definition lines, don't we? IIRC, unnumbered Source: or Patch: just defaults to Source0: resp. Patch0:. But it

Re: New Fedora Planet

2024-05-17 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Pedro Moura wrote: > To add blog posts in Fedora Planet you basically need to update RSS URL > field at https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/ Which means that basically all blogs are going to vanish from Fedora Planet unless people re-add them manually. There are 809 blogs on the old Planet

Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
As of today, I have built Node.js 22.2.0 for Fedora Rawhide. It is currently available as a non-default package (Node.js 20 remains the default during this short transition period). If you maintain a package that depends on Node.js (either runtime or build-time), please take some time in the next

[Bug 2249161] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249161 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-56f8190677 (perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-56f8190677 -- You are receiving this

Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
As of today, I have built Node.js 22.2.0 for Fedora Rawhide. It is currently available as a non-default package (Node.js 20 remains the default during this short transition period). If you maintain a package that depends on Node.js (either runtime or build-time), please take some time in the next

[Bug 2002396] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.32 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002396 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version|

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:43:22AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 + > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a > > > hard place.

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 13:41:27: > On 5/17/24 11:37, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:30:01: > >> On 5/17/24 11:14, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >>> Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:04:47: > On 5/17/24 10:47,

[Bug 2249161] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249161 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 5/17/24 11:37, Michael J Gruber wrote: Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:30:01: On 5/17/24 11:14, Michael J Gruber wrote: Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:04:47: On 5/17/24 10:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote:

[Bug 2249161] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.19 is available

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249161 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-5adff944cd (perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.16-1.fc38) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5adff944cd -- You are receiving

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-eb6eeadd90 (perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.16-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-eb6eeadd90 -- You are receiving

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-b4a4e97be4 (perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.16-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b4a4e97be4 -- You are receiving

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0

Re: New Fedora Planet

2024-05-17 Thread Kamil Paral
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:29 AM Pedro Moura wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on > fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift. > This new application uses information from the Fedora Account System to > find

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/05/2024 11:04, Martin Stransky wrote: I see. I don't think it's useful for gnome search as it uses live data (also from recently visited URL) and also sorts results for popularity. It should give you the same results as writing directly to Firefox URL bar. This is not a problem because

Re: New Fedora Planet

2024-05-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 10:16 odp. Pedro Moura napsal(a): To add blog posts in Fedora Planet you basically need to update RSS URL field at https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/ How can I add more feeds? Under my account I had feeds to two Packit blogs, one ABRT and my personal. -- Miroslav Suchy,

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 5/17/24 11:32, Michael J Gruber wrote: Kevin Kofler via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-16 22:39:00: Panu Matilainen wrote: Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and the latter %autopatch

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:30:01: > On 5/17/24 11:14, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:04:47: > >> On 5/17/24 10:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >>> On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote: > Hm, does really KDE

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 5/17/24 11:14, Michael J Gruber wrote: Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:04:47: On 5/17/24 10:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote: Hm, does really KDE Plasma access Firefox profile and searches it for anything? That's interesting.

[Bug 2275134] Upgrade perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random to 0.16

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275134 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |ppi...@redhat.com |.org

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-17 11:04:47: > On 5/17/24 10:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote: > >> Hm, does really KDE Plasma access Firefox profile and searches it for > >> anything? That's interesting. Can you point me to any info

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 5/17/24 10:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote: Hm, does really KDE Plasma access Firefox profile and searches it for anything? That's interesting. Can you point me to any info about it? It looks like it copies Firefox's *.sqlite databases to

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/05/2024 10:38, Martin Stransky wrote: Hm, does really KDE Plasma access Firefox profile and searches it for anything? That's interesting. Can you point me to any info about it? It looks like it copies Firefox's *.sqlite databases to ~/.cache/bookmarksrunner on every user login and then

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17. 05. 24 v 7:16 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 5/16/24 16:10, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root Most of

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-17 Thread Paul Howarth
On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a > > hard place. :thinking: > > I don't think I've ever seen packages being *removed* when

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 5/17/24 10:28, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 17/05/2024 08:05, Martin Stransky wrote: Gnome search service is provided by running Firefox application itself. It's because it searches and publishes results from recent live user profile. Why can't GNOME Search engine just parse

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

2024-05-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
Kevin Kofler via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-16 22:39:00: > Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically > > numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and > > the latter %autopatch which is supposed to apply patches

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/05/2024 08:05, Martin Stransky wrote: Gnome search service is provided by running Firefox application itself. It's because it searches and publishes results from recent live user profile. Why can't GNOME Search engine just parse Firefox's *.sqlite databases like everyone else does

Re: New Fedora Planet

2024-05-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:16:17PM -0300, Pedro Moura wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on > fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift. > This new application uses information from the Fedora Account System to >

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2024-05-17 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:56:37 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers > from the packager group. > > > More details available in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11901 > > Packages that have been orphaned are: > >

Re: Missing util-linux-core in fedora:40 container image

2024-05-17 Thread Manabu Ori
Thank you, I confirmed it is fixed now!! $ podman run --rm quay.io/fedora/fedora:40 sh -c 'type findmnt; rpm -q util-linux-core' findmnt is /usr/bin/findmnt util-linux-core-2.40.1-1.fc40.x86_64 Manabu Ori 2024年5月17日(金) 6:25 Kevin Fenzi : > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:43:42PM GMT, Manabu

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

2024-05-17 Thread Martin Stransky
On 5/15/24 12:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 15/05/2024 10:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing absolutely nothing and just hogging