Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 6/9/22 13:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:44 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: >> >> On Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:36:19 AM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: >>> H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec. >>> Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux

Re: CMake broken in rawhide?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 4:32 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > The %cmake line had a trailing ".". Removing it fixes the issue. ... 'workarounds', rather than 'fixes'. Soon it will be half a year since the breaking change has been silently introduced. In the meanwhile, the CMake upstream themselves

Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717 This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp enhances notmuch's capabilities considerably. Feel free to suggest a review swap within my capabilities (say C/Python). Cheers Michael

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 10/06/2022 05:08, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: I admit I have not checked, but does ffmpeg-free include the hardware GPU support for the various patented codecs (letting the GPU vendor pay the license costs for the decoder) and if not, would RH legal consider adding that hardware driver support

Re: Request to change default /etc/resolv.conf symlink

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:49:50PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:53:01PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > > On 09. 06. 22 19:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > I reviewed your pull request > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/21317. > > > I

Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

On 25. 01. 22 12:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, during the Fedora 34 development cycle a year ago, I've reported the following buzgillas about packages that don't install:

[HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 1 We anticipate starting this rebuild on Monday,

Re: Fedora Copr - EPEL-9 buildroot

> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth wrote: > > I'm surprised that the EPEL 9 chroots haven't switched to RHEL 9 yet. > We've had RHEL 9 + EPEL 9 configs for almost a month now... > > Pavel, do you know when they're going to be deployed to COPR? Also, there seems to be a general

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 10/06/2022 10:30, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Let me guess: software encoding is too slow? I did manage to do pure software recording from OBS Studio once, but I have no idea what the video quality was or what codec would have been used. Yes, very slow. You need a separate computer if you

Re: Minizip pull requests

Forwarding to the package maintainers as a heads-up -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat -- On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 5:55 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > W dniu 21.04.2022 o 21:22, Julian Sikorski pisze: > > Hello, > > > > I have created two PRs against

Re: Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library

I'll take it and review it. I don't have any ones to swap currently. -Ian On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717 > > This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp > enhances notmuch's capabilities

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 6/9/22 23:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:10 PM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/06/2022 10:02, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: We should really start thinking about this. >>> >>> Yes. Patents

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

Le ven. 10 juin 2022 à 03:32, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit : > [...] > Thanks Neal. That resolved the issue. About the use of pkgconfig insude > FindFFmpeg.cmake filr from upstream Blender, patch is welcome. > @Luya Please remind that you have now a larger issue that is about testing that blender

Re: Request to change default /etc/resolv.conf symlink

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:53:01PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > On 09. 06. 22 19:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I reviewed your pull request https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/21317. > > I know you are trying to move things forward, but at the same time, > > you're not really

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 10/06/2022 10:35, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Could that be fixed upstream, such that the hardware support will be used where available? The upstream is not interested in maintaining stripped versions. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

CPE Weekly Update – Week 23 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 6th - 10th 2022 If you wish to read this in form

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 6/10/22 11:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 10/06/2022 05:08, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: I admit I have not checked, but does ffmpeg-free include the hardware GPU support for the various patented codecs (letting the GPU vendor pay the license costs for the decoder) and if not, would RH

[HEADS UP] wxGTK update to 3.1.7

Hi, I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump. I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its dependencies. I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity in the side tag. @rathann, can you please build wxmacmolplt in the f37-build-side-54462

Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

On 10. 06. 22 15:21, Ben Cotton wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 7:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: I wonder how many of them will be set to ASSIGNED without any action, how many will get fixed, and how many will actually pass unnoticed this time, allowing the packages to be orphaned and hopefully

Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > They all blocked the F34FailsToInstall tracker, if that helps. It helps for F34, but updating the tracking bug for each release doesn't play well with my Jupyter notebook. But! Now that I've had more coffee I realize that I can just look

Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 7:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I wonder how many of them will be set to ASSIGNED without any action, how many > will get fixed, and how many will actually pass unnoticed this time, allowing > the packages to be orphaned and hopefully taken by somebody who will fix them.

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK update to 3.1.7

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 6/10/22 10:43 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump. I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its dependencies. I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity

Re: F37 proposal: Fallback Hostname (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FallbackHostname > The proposal here is to enable variants of Fedora Linux to configure > their default/fallback hostname and to set the default for variants > targetting servers (Cloud, CoreOS,

Re: F37 proposal: Fallback Hostname (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 3:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FallbackHostname > > The proposal here is to enable variants of Fedora Linux to configure > > their default/fallback

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK update to 3.1.7

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote: Hi, Scott. On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 16:43, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump. I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its dependencies. I've built

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK update to 3.1.7

On 6/10/22 10:43 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump. I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its dependencies. I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity in the side tag. @rathann, can you please build

Re: Archive value is out of time_t range

Hi Mamoru. Could be useful changing timestamp of that file when i create the IceCat source archive to resolve this problem? On 6/2/22 16:50, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2022/06/02 23:33: Hi all. rpmuncompress is failing in Rawhide i686 architecture only with:

Re: [HEADS UP] wxGTK update to 3.1.7

Hi, Scott. On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 16:43, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, > > I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump. > > I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its > dependencies. > > I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity in the

Re: VirtualBox and HOST kernel-5.17.12 weirdness

On 2022-06-08 15:00, Alexander G. M. Smith wrote: > Ian Laurie wrote on Friday, 3 June 2022 at 11:17 p.m.: > > Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox > > 6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is running > > Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12? >

Re: VirtualBox and HOST kernel-5.17.12 weirdness

On 2022-06-10 19:02, Alexander G. M. Smith wrote: > So, should we report this to VirtualBox?  They seem like the most appropriate people.  Kernel people would be a possibility? > > Found a relevant bug report: > https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/20976 Found a better bug report:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220610.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220610.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora Copr - EPEL-9 buildroot

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 4:18 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth > wrote: > > > > I'm surprised that the EPEL 9 chroots haven't switched to RHEL 9 yet. > > We've had RHEL 9 + EPEL 9 configs for almost a month now... > > > > Pavel, do you know when

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-06-13 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have anything much for the agenda again, and I'm going to be on vacation that day. If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, and you want to run a meeting, you can send out a meeting announcement with

Fedora-Rawhide-20220610.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 33/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) ID: 1294478 Test: x86_64

Re: Fedora Copr - EPEL-9 buildroot

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've been trying to complete the OpenVPN 3 Linux v18_beta release in my > Fedora Copr repository for EPEL-9. But there seems to be something odd > going on here. I tried to reach out on IRC earlier today but didn't get > much

[HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 1 We anticipate starting this rebuild on Monday,

[HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 1 We anticipate starting this rebuild on Monday,

[Bug 2095515] Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RandPasswd in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095515 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[EPEL-devel] Re: BTW Thanks

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 4:29 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Not sure it was already said. With the release of RHEL9, EPEL9 (repo) > was in such a good state that the first steps with EL9 felt super > pleasant (compared to the EL8 start). So, thank you

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 3:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I was only > thinking of CAN we do it. I wasn't thinking SHOULD we do it. > We've come to the point that we actually can do it. But before we go down > that road, I wanted to

[Bug 2092465] perl-Locale-Codes-3.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092465 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2092465] perl-Locale-Codes-3.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092465 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.71-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.71-1.fc

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ce8d5824ad halibut-1.3-3.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aaaeae50ce rubygem-jmespath-1.3.1-1.el7 The following builds have