Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On 05/01/2022 08:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Can you point to where that is forbidden? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_shebang_lines env, /bin/env and /usr/bin/env MUST NOT be used. The interpreter used to run packaged applications cannot depend upon what the

[Bug 2036310] perl-Math-BigInt-1.999829 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036310 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:34 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 04/01/2022 19:36, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > #!/usr/bin/env python3 > > Forbidden by Python guidelines too. Can you point to where that is forbidden? Because it remains quite popular for various working environments with

Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On 04/01/2022 19:36, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: #!/usr/bin/env python3 Forbidden by Python guidelines too. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 2036122] Please branch and build perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036122 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- perl-XML-XPathEngine-0.14-23.el9 has been built now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036122

[Bug 2036122] Please branch and build perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036122 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- perl-XML-XPathEngine-0.14-23.el8 has been built now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036122

Re: File collision advice

On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 23:04, Jerry James wrote: > > I would like some advice on this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036438 > > There are a number of packages with names of the form > python-sphinxcontrib-foo, which install their files into >

XEmacs retirement

I intend to retire the following packages soon: neXtaw xemacs xemacs-packages-base xemacs-packages-extra I believe all of the dependencies on these packages have been removed in Rawhide. Some of the affected packages have made the necessary change in git, but have not been rebuilt yet. The

Re: Review swaps

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James wrote: > Happy New Year! > > I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack: > > - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160 > - ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395 > -

File collision advice

I would like some advice on this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036438 There are a number of packages with names of the form python-sphinxcontrib-foo, which install their files into %{python3_sitelib}/sphinxcontrib/foo/. The issue is that at least two of these,

[Bug 2036661] Please branch and build perl-Scope-Upper for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036506] Please branch and build perl-XML-Dumper for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036506 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036491] Please branch and build perl-Test-Refcount for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036491 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2036494] Please branch and build perl-CSS-Tiny for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036494 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036498] Please branch and build perl-Parallel-Iterator for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036498 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036225] Please branch and build perl-Test-Portability-Files for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036225 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036508] Please branch and build perl-Data-Taxi for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036508 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2036900] Please branch and build perl-Net-LibIDN2 for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036900 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036509] Please branch and build perl-Data-Denter for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036509 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036500] Please branch and build perl-B-Debug for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036500 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036504] Please branch and build perl-Exporter-Tidy for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036504 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036665] Please branch and build perl-Digest-SHA3 for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036665 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036497] Please branch and build perl-Dir-Self for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036497 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2034172] EPEL9 branch of perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2031799] perl-FCGI-ProcManager for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036663] Please branch and build perl-IO-CaptureOutput for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036663 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2036507] Please branch and build perl-PHP-Serialization for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036118] Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: New tool - license-validate

Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:33 David Cantrell napsal(a): I feel like I'm missing something, but rpminspect has been doing what license-validate does for years now.  It's ready for SPDX expressions. Results show up for Fedora builds in Zuul.  Or you can run it locally. Here is my motivation: We are

Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

Hi Fedora developers, I’m looking to join your ranks  I’ve made a few PRs already, and had mistakenly skipped this important step of introducing myself. I’m a senior

Re: New tool - license-validate

Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:03 David Cantrell napsal(a): One of the difficult things with the Fedora abbreviations is that tokens can have spaces in them.  For example, the Apache 2.0 license in Fedora is called "ASL 2.0".  This makes it really hard to work with in software. Likewise, we have

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-5bb8ca4ef4 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: F36 Change: %set_build_flags for %build and %check (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/20/21 12:39, Florian Weimer wrote: * Ben Cotton: This change will be implemented by updating the %__spec_build_pre and %__speck_check_pre macros in redhat-rpm-config to include %set_build_flags. This will set these environment variables automatically before the %build and %check

[rpms/perl-Browser-Open] PR #1: Import EPEL9 package from rawhide

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Browser-Open` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Import EPEL9 package from rawhide `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Browser-Open/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

[rpms/perl-Browser-Open] PR #1: Import EPEL9 package from rawhide

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Browser-Open` that you are following: `` Import EPEL9 package from rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Browser-Open/pull-request/1 ___

[Bug 2036118] Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: New tool - license-validate

Neal Gompa writes: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:10 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >> Neal Gompa writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >> >> >> Neal Gompa writes: >> >> >> >> > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not >> >> > change. >> >>

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 03:21:20PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:10 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: Neal Gompa writes: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >> Neal Gompa writes: >> >> > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not >> >

[Bug 2036118] Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Re: buildroot size growth

On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > It seems that Rawhide buildroot has grown some dependencies between 10th > and 23rd of December. > > The last official build of Ruby I did [1] installs  152 packages: > > ~~~ > > DEBUG util.py:446: Install 152 Packages > DEBUG

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:10 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Neal Gompa writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> > >> Neal Gompa writes: > >> > >> > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not > >> > change. > >> > >> I don't believe that's

[Bug 2036665] Please branch and build perl-Digest-SHA3 for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036665 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036661] Please branch and build perl-Scope-Upper for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036506] Please branch and build perl-XML-Dumper for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036506 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036504] Please branch and build perl-Exporter-Tidy for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036504 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: New tool - license-validate

Neal Gompa writes: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >> Neal Gompa writes: >> >> > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not >> > change. >> >> I don't believe that's correct. >> >> For instance, for the LGPL, SPDX uses "LGPL-2.0-only" and >>

[Bug 2036498] Please branch and build perl-Parallel-Iterator for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036498 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:40:06PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: Neal Gompa writes: > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not > change. I don't believe that's correct. For instance, for the LGPL, SPDX uses

[Bug 2036225] Please branch and build perl-Test-Portability-Files for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036225 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036497] Please branch and build perl-Dir-Self for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036497 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: New tool - license-validate

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:25 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Neal Gompa writes: > > > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not > > change. > > I don't believe that's correct. > > For instance, for the LGPL, SPDX uses "LGPL-2.0-only" and > "LGPL-2.0-or-later", while Fedora

Re: New tool - license-validate

Neal Gompa writes: > SPDX expression logic is identical to Fedora's, so that will not > change. I don't believe that's correct. For instance, for the LGPL, SPDX uses "LGPL-2.0-only" and "LGPL-2.0-or-later", while Fedora currently uses "LGPLv2" and "LGPLv2+". (From https://spdx.org/licenses/

[Bug 2036900] Please branch and build perl-Net-LibIDN2 for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036900 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[rpms/perl-Net-LibIDN2] PR #1: Import package to EPEL9 from rawhide

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-LibIDN2` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Import package to EPEL9 from rawhide `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-LibIDN2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

[rpms/perl-Net-LibIDN2] PR #1: Import package to EPEL9 from rawhide

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-LibIDN2` that you are following: `` Import package to EPEL9 from rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-LibIDN2/pull-request/1 ___

[Bug 2036500] Please branch and build perl-B-Debug for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036500 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 01. 22 13:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 04/01/2022 11:09, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> We have some scripts that are dual Python 2/Python 3, and Fedora tooling > >> forced us to carry a downstream-only patch to replace

[rpms/perl-B-Debug] PR #1: Import epel9 version from rawhide

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Debug` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Import epel9 version from rawhide `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Debug/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2036508] Please branch and build perl-Data-Taxi for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036508 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036509] Please branch and build perl-Data-Denter for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036509 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036494] Please branch and build perl-CSS-Tiny for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036494 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2031799] perl-FCGI-ProcManager for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2036491] Please branch and build perl-Test-Refcount for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036491 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2036663] Please branch and build perl-IO-CaptureOutput for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036663 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (in Winter)

Thank you for working on this, Fabio! On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 6:32 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hello Rust packagers, > > (I'm sending this email to the devel and rust lists, and I've added all > directly > affected package maintainers in Bcc - because adding them all to the "To" > or > "CC"

[rpms/perl-B-Debug] PR #1: Import epel9 version from rawhide

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Debug` that you are following: `` Import epel9 version from rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Debug/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

[Bug 2034172] EPEL9 branch of perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1757009] perl-Qt 4.14.3 missing for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757009 --- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson --- My opinion, yes. Bugs about qt4 in RHEL/EPEL8 can be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757009

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-01-05 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

[Bug 2036507] Please branch and build perl-PHP-Serialization for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2037002] New: Please branch and build perl-Convert-Bencode_XS for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037002 Bug ID: 2037002 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Convert-Bencode_XS for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2035898] perl-bignum-0.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035898 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Packages disappearing from the EPEL 9 buildroot

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:15 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 06:29, Mattias Ellert > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Two packages I built for EPEL 9 are now reported by koschei as having >> missing build dependencies. >> >>

Re: F36 Change: Hunspell Dictionary dir change (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 09:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:49AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == How To Test == > > 1. Check if default installed dictionary path is > > `/usr/share/hunspell/` instead of `/usr/share/myspell/` > > Would it be possible to

[Bug 2031907] [RFE:EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for perl-Parse-EDID

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031907 Pat Riehecky changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value ---

[EPEL-devel] Re: GIMP future in RHEL-9

Basically all those https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues?milestone_title=3.0 should be done to be able to release GIMP 3 (the blockers are minimum) Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:29 PM Patrick Riehecky

[EPEL-devel] Re: Status of python-gevent in EL9

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 9:45 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:30 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> >>> Can someone shed light on the status of python-gevent in EL9? It seems >>> to have been built for CS9:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Status of python-gevent in EL9

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:30 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> Can someone shed light on the status of python-gevent in EL9? It seems >> to have been built for CS9: >> >>

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-01-05 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting=Open SIG

[EPEL-devel] Re: GIMP future in RHEL-9

Exciting news, is there a link to the ticket(s) the GIMP folks need help with? Odds are I'm not qualified but I'd be happy to look. Pat On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 10:46 +0100, Josef Řídký wrote: > Hi folks, > > just want to send some heads up info about the GIMP package in the > RHEL-9 release. >

Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > I see in this table that there are still a bunch of languages using > non-Noto fonts where there appears to be a Noto equivalent available, > e.g., https://fonts.google.com/noto shows me Devanagari, Bengali, and > Tamil on the first page whereas your table indicates

buildroot size growth

It seems that Rawhide buildroot has grown some dependencies between 10th and 23rd of December. The last official build of Ruby I did [1] installs  152 packages: ~~~ DEBUG util.py:446: Install 152 Packages DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 59 M DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 231

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Paul

Re: Copr success but no packages?

On 1/4/22 04:28 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 03/01/2022 22:25, Steven A. Falco wrote: The builder-live.log in the F35 dir shows that the rpms were written, but they are missing from the dir. Too aggressive web cache on COPR side. I've seen this issue several times too. Thanks for

use of kernel/yama/ptrace_scope in rpm scriptlets

Happy New Year everyone, noticed on device: Pinephone At least since early last year, most likely much longer, rpm scriptlets report this message: Couldn't write '0' to 'kernel/yama/ptrace_scope', ignoring: No such file or directory Can the one responsible please add some sort of check to

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|robinlee.s...@gmail.com |p...@city-fan.org -- You are receiving

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment

Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On 04. 01. 22 13:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 04/01/2022 11:09, Florian Weimer wrote: We have some scripts that are dual Python 2/Python 3, and Fedora tooling forced us to carry a downstream-only patch to replace /usr/bin/python with /usr/bin/python3.  I'd like to remove this patch.

Re: Is it okay to use /usr/bin/python again?

On 04/01/2022 11:09, Florian Weimer wrote: We have some scripts that are dual Python 2/Python 3, and Fedora tooling forced us to carry a downstream-only patch to replace /usr/bin/python with /usr/bin/python3. I'd like to remove this patch. It is forbidden. You should switch your SPEC to

[Bug 2036922] Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2032430 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2032430] perl-Type-Tiny for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2036922 --- Comment #11 from Paul

[Bug 2036922] New: Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922 Bug ID: 2036922 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-Refcount Assignee:

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6b7c00e649 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6b7c00e649 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2022551] perl-HTTP-Message-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022551 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

RE: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

> From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 12:27 PM > On 1/4/22 10:41, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > in the FESCo meeting yesterday, Zbigniew asked what is > > the relationship between this feature and > >

[Bug 2032430] perl-Type-Tiny for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #9) > I don't see where the dependency on Devel::Refcount comes from. The testsuite uses it: Type-Tiny-1.012004/Makefile.PL: Devel::Refcount

[Bug 2036900] Please branch and build perl-Net-LibIDN2 for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036900 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

  1   2   >