https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037243
--- Comment #2 from lionel.c...@cern.ch ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-String-Similarity in EPEL?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on EPEL
(FAS lcons).
--
You are receiving this mail
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 17.1.2022 klo 22.05:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:47:13AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:07:33AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just FTR, I don't think that as a sponsor, I can close the ticket and that
is a bit discouraging.
There's no way to tell
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 17/228 (x86_64), 25/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220114.n.0):
ID: 1106996 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL:
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately,
> so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week.
Certain Ada source files trigger what looks like infinite tail
recursion in add_sibling_attributes in dwarf2out.c:
Mark,
Petr's suggestion I find a co maintainer sounds very sensible. It's unlikely
I'll need to do any other package. I would be pleased to assist you if you
chose to be that person.
Darryl
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Inline-Struct-0.30-1.f |perl-Inline-Struct-0.30-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038205
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Hi Chen,
Thanks for your welcome, let`s contribute our effort to Fedora community.
BR
Jun
On 2022/1/17 08:50, xinghong chen wrote:
welcome Jun, It's very nice to have talk with you!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:44:57AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:35 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 00:21, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:05 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings.
> > > >
> > > > We currently have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041002
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On 1/17/22 16:42, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm trying to look into a package test failure on RHEL8 s390x. However,
it seems that my free developer subscription does not give me access to
this platform:
[linux1@rhel8 ~]$ sudo subscription-manager attach
Installed Product
Last week, I retired the `nodejs` package from EPEL 7 because it was
(I believed) stuck on Node.js 6.x due to insufficient dependency
support. Apparently, this broke a few things like uglify-js[1], so I
spent today looking into whether I could get Node.js 16.x to work (the
latest LTS release) and
Last week, I retired the `nodejs` package from EPEL 7 because it was
(I believed) stuck on Node.js 6.x due to insufficient dependency
support. Apparently, this broke a few things like uglify-js[1], so I
spent today looking into whether I could get Node.js 16.x to work (the
latest LTS release) and
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-568a1eb67d
btrbk-0.31.3-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d515d4692
binaryen-104-1.el7
4
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220117.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 19
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 248
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 45.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I'm trying to look into a package test failure on RHEL8 s390x. However,
it seems that my free developer subscription does not give me access to
this platform:
[linux1@rhel8 ~]$ sudo subscription-manager attach
Installed Product Current Status:
Product Name: Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:31:41 PM EST Sebastian Crane wrote:
> Welcome to Fedora! The Bridge Hand Generator looks really
> interesting. I've been meaning to learn Bridge; now I'll be able to
> have computer-assistance for at least the dealing aspect!
Thank you for the warm welcome,
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:17 AM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
> > - How do I generate my own new keypair so I can IMA-sign an RPM?
>
> You can generate the key with the standard OpenSSL commands.
> For example, an RSA key can be generated like:
> openssl genrsa | openssl pkcs8 -topk8
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:47:13AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:07:33AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Just FTR, I don't think that as a sponsor, I can close the ticket and that
> > is a bit discouraging.
>
> There's no way to tell pagure.io "everyone in the fedora
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 01:37:08PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > For kernel, the only bug on the GCC side I'm aware of is
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101941
>
> We are seeing similar issues in a few different files depending on
> arch. Largely due to options compiled in and compile order,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:32 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:27:15PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today.
> > > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression
> > > and documentation
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:27:15PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today.
> > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression
> > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be
> > just
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 8:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today.
> GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression
> and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be
> just those
Thank you.
I sent an email to your Red Hat account CC my Red Hat account on Jan 12th.
I also filed a PR at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lldpd/pull-request/6
Finally, I requested help regarding a test failing in dist-git that works
locally:
> Am 17.01.2022 um 05:16 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:59 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 14.01.2022 um 23:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>>>
>>>
>>> Wait, I thought this change was about making the path consistent
>>> within Fedora variants?
>>
>> The question
> Am 17.01.2022 um 05:17 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 4:34 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>> @Neal, I remember a Suse employee made once (about a year ago) a proposal to
>> slightly modify FHS to better separate distro specific from local specific
>> content, especially in
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 11:16:57 PM EST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:59 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> > > Am 14.01.2022 um 23:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
> > >
> > >
> > > Wait, I thought this change was about making the path consistent
> > > within Fedora variants?
> >
> > The
David Sastre writes:
> In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am
> attempting to contact Aaron Conole (aconole).
Contacted.
> Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer? Direct email and bug
> reports have had no response.
Looks like the bug reports
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 02:59:15PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> I tried compiling colobot with the new gcc, expecting it to break in some
> new and fascinating way, and got the following error:
>
> In function 'std::char_traits::copy(char*, char const*, unsigned long)',
> inlined
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #4)
> FTR, I was setting up RT to run using psgi back in 2013...
I repeatedly tried, but I have never been able to get this working and repeatly
asked for
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 01:18:51PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Ceph fails with gcc-12 too.
>
> scratch build at
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81280838
>
> upstream ceph bug at https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53896
That looks like a ceph bug.
C++ says std::unique_ptr
I tried compiling colobot with the new gcc, expecting it to break in some
new and fascinating way, and got the following error:
In function 'std::char_traits::copy(char*, char const*, unsigned long)',
inlined from 'std::__cxx11::basic_string,
std::allocator >::_S_copy(char*, char const*,
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 12:33 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I've done some poking, and this is what I've come up with for *new*
> missing -devel packages in CS9 with their approximate number of users in
> rawhide:
>
> 389-ds-base-devel 2
> accel-config-devel 0
> anthy-unicode-devel 3
>
FlexiBLAS is FTBFS in rawhide [1], and upstream has managed to create a MWE
that doesn't involve FlexiBLAS [2]. So it seems like an issue specific to CMake
+ GCC/GFortran 12 + CMake's FortranC Interface. Possible regression in gcc?
Iñaki
[1]
Your original reviewer (or any Fedora packager) can still approve the package
even though they are not a packager sponsor. You just won’t be able to import
it until you have found a sponsor. It’s normal to have one or more packages
approved before finding a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038239
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038205
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a12784dff2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a12784dff2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038205
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 15:10 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 17/01/2022 15:00, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > dependency “json”: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/3138
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041187
>
Rawhide compose doomed again [1] :( , I still haven't the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
FTR, I was setting up RT to run using psgi back in 2013...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
I will be more than happy to give maintainership of mod_perl to someone indeed
interested in it. Ralf, if you need mod_perl, I can transfer the package to
you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Ok, I should have known about that. So I'll remove Fedora from the conditional
to keep only EL9, I trust this should be fine with you.
Although, you made me curious so I took a look at RT doc, and
On 17/01/2022 15:00, Ben Beasley wrote:
dependency “json”: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/3138
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041187
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2022-01-17/neurofedora.2022-01-17-13.02.html
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:12 PM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Attending, as the Fedora-DI/Diversity meeting today got cancelled and i
> got some spare time :)
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:40 AM Ankur Sinha
>
On 1/17/22 12:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Perhaps Paolo Bonzini is familiar with both qemu and gcc...
/me waves hands. This is now https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104067.
Paolo
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Skimming through Koschei, here are a sampling of regressions that seem
to be associated with GCC 12. Some of these are in packages I maintain
directly; others are via @neuro-sig.
With a few exceptions, I have triaged these only to the extent of
confirming the problem appeared at the same time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036510
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041002
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-dbb319e849 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-dbb319e849
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hello all!
Red Hat subscribed builders (for EPEL 8) have been deployed to production.
So any EPEL 8 build in Fedora Copr is now done against RHEL 8 + EPEL 8. As
always, please report back any issues.
There's though some problem related to the s390x native builders. Please
stay tuned on that
Hello all!
Red Hat subscribed builders (for EPEL 8) have been deployed to production.
So any EPEL 8 build in Fedora Copr is now done against RHEL 8 + EPEL 8. As
always, please report back any issues.
There's though some problem related to the s390x native builders. Please
stay tuned on that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041002
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.0
Attending, as the Fedora-DI/Diversity meeting today got cancelled and i got
some spare time :)
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:40 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 17th
> January (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |p...@city-fan.org
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent` that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 15:31 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know
> immediately, so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild
> next week.
One of LibreOffice's import tests started to crash during rebuild with
gcc-12, sbergman filed a
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:32:36PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:58:10PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I tried recompiling qemu and it fails with an odd error in the RCU
> > torture test. Bug submitted upstream here:
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidmcche...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
--- Comment #1 from Alex Iribarren ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Authen-Krb5 in epel9?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
Hi, Darryl.
> How to clone the GitHub repository in the spec file
RPM packages are build from Source files. You don't clone the repository in the
spec;
rather, you download the repository as a tarball and use that. For GitHub, you
can download
a specific git tag (or commit) by using the
Hi Darryl,
if you have all sources in single repository then only one source
package should exist for them. That means one spec file, which can
contain multiple sub-packages produced on build. But input should still
be single if they come from single repository.
You can build both python and
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:58:10PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I tried recompiling qemu and it fails with an odd error in the RCU
> torture test. Bug submitted upstream here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/823
>
> ... but since GCC 12 is the only big thing that has
I used this software some years ago during my PhD, although ultimately
didn't go very far with it (decided against writing my own automation
system and outsourced it to an undergrad with LabVIEW...).
I would be happy to take a look (especially if I can find that little
USB relay again I was
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 01:18:51PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Ceph fails with gcc-12 too.
>
> scratch build at
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81280838
>
> upstream ceph bug at https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53896
Can you please mail me preprocessed source on which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041002
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
--- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41046
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031329
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041247
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:44 AM Darryl Bond wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I maintain a small application hosted on GitHub.
> (https://github.com/darrylb123/usbrelay)
> It allows control of USB connected electrical relays. Originally it was a
> simple command line application.
> Over the years, it has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
Bug ID: 2041430
Summary: [RFC] Drop support for mod_perl in F36+/EL9+
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Plack
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040913
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fdfcc367f8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fdfcc367f8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hello,
I maintain a small application hosted on GitHub.
(https://github.com/darrylb123/usbrelay)
It allows control of USB connected electrical relays. Originally it was a
simple command line application.
Over the years, it has accumulated additional features such as a python
interface, and an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040913
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Redis-1.999-1.fc36
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:02:23 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> 2) Moving content to CRB in RHEL is not a silver bullet solution in
> many scenarios. If it's strictly for build dependencies, CRB works
> well. If an EPEL package has a runtime requires on CRB content, that
> is less desirable. RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041285
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220116.0):
ID: 1106135 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040913
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
https://www.babycarestudio.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 17th
January (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
Hello all!
We would like to share with you what happened in Packit last year. Here,
two blog posts sum it up for you:
* https://packit.dev/posts/2021-features/
* https://packit.dev/posts/2021-in-numbers/
Thank all of you who has helped us to achieve that!
On behalf of the Packit team,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041279
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041284
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am
attempting to contact Aaron Conole (aconole).
Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer? Direct email and
bug reports have had no response.
This is in reference to these open bugs with lldpd:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220116.0):
ID: 1106069 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1106069
Soft failed openQA tests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040777
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-8.0.0-1.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040777
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
89 matches
Mail list logo
