Again sorry for top posting, using OWA which doesn't quote properly.
It sounds like you're making good progress which is fantastic!
Please tag me in any merge requests (using @chriadam on github etc) so that I
get notified of them, and then I can review etc.
Best regards,
Chris.
Hi,
I cannot be much help here (I don't remember much about it, and didn't know
much about the syncml server to begin with) but I will ask a few questions just
in case they help:
1) is it possible that the SyncML plugin works over a variety of transports
(e.g. not just bluetooth but also
Even though it's not directly related to the original question but IMO
there's isn't much sense in building Harbour apps against the latest
available SDK. That would almost certainly make your app incompatible
with older releases of SFOS. I build my Harbour (and OpenRepos) apps
against the
Hi Martin,
Op vr 26 jul. 2019 om 00:02 schreef Martin Kampas :
> Hi Eli,
>
>
>
> does the Android SDK version match the Android OS version?
>
> does the macOS SDK version match the macOS version?
>
> does the Windows SDK version match the Windows OS version?
>
> does the Qt Creator version match
Hi Eli,
does the Android SDK version match the Android OS version?
does the macOS SDK version match the macOS version?
does the Windows SDK version match the Windows OS version?
does the Qt Creator version match the Qt version?
...
The universal answer is No, simply because the SDK and the
Andrey I don't need the older SDKs, due to some technical issues (lack of
free space to download updates) I did a delete+reinstall of the SDK but
while downloading the version number of the current SDK (2.1) caused me to
cancel the download and double check that I was indeed getting the latest
SDK
Why you need older sdk with bugs, when you can use latest sdk with multiple
targets for older sfos versions?
чт, 25 июл. 2019 г., 20:39 Tone Kastlunger :
> +1 to this;
> I had the same issue. It's confusing if you have to reinstall from scratch
> for instance.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:44 PM
+1 to this;
I had the same issue. It's confusing if you have to reinstall from scratch
for instance.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:44 PM E.S. Rosenberg <
es.rosenberg+sailfishos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> TL;DR - if we're doing version numbers for the SDK can they at least be
> the same as
Hi all,
TL;DR - if we're doing version numbers for the SDK can they at least be the
same as the SFOS to which they correspond?
I assume this may have come up already in the past but I still want to ask
this again.
I noticed when recently redownloading the SDK that the versioning scheme
had
Hello,
I am pleased to report success in running a generated Sailfish app in
the Qt Creator debugger.
As my phone was offering me a further update to 3.0.1.11, I decided to
take advantage of that update. Of course, I then needed to download the
3.0.1.11 SDK, and set up the kits for Qt
deloptes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know if following scenario is normal from msyncd point of view
> to stop the server when no sync was done and to leave the server running
> after one sync was done.
>
> E.0. restart msynd to make sure all is clean
> A.1. enable BT - msyncd spawns the
Hi,
I wanted to know if following scenario is normal from msyncd point of view
to stop the server when no sync was done and to leave the server running
after one sync was done.
E.0. restart msynd to make sure all is clean
A.1. enable BT - msyncd spawns the syncml-server process
A.2. disable BT -
12 matches
Mail list logo
