David Dawes wrote:
I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
Linux is something of an exception in this regard. Does anyone
have a good reason to not do this?
In NX we use alternate versions of libX11,
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:53:06PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Someone needs to track down the bug that causes a server crash and
subsequent lockup if a dualhead config is used but mga_hal is not
available (either not around or wasn't compiled
Does anyone have a good reason to not do this?
I seem to remember an rpath considered harmful message from
around the time the libraries changed from R5 to R6. The
author said to use rpath-link instead of rpath. I don't know
if that would do what you want (sorry, it's been so long I
don't even
It ships with XFree86 and RH should have installed it in
/usr/X11R6/lib/
Mark.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Elie Azulay wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for that lib
(redhat 9 on pc intel)
Best regards
--
Elie Azulay Espace Multimedia
Bat 336 Universite Paris-Sud
91405 Orsay Cedex
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
Only the G400 needs it for dualhead and tv-out. the g450/550 need hal
to use the DVI port and the g200 MMS cards need it for multi-head.
it's also needed for mergedfb on all chips. the mga fb driver supports
all of this, so in
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
Only the G400 needs it for dualhead and tv-out. the g450/550 need
hal
to use the DVI port and the g200 MMS cards need it for multi-head.
it's also needed for mergedfb on all
What do you mean by all when you say the mga fb driver supports all of
this? Do you mean the stuff you said hal was needed for (DVI on g450/550,
multi-head on g200 MMS etc)? Is the mga fb driver you mention the mga
driver included in XFree86? Using this I find that I do need hal for DVI
on the
