On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:49 +0200, Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-2] Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Actually, I didn't know earlier but the radeon should not continue but make X
rather die as I have AGP 9200 card, and that's
Michel Dnzer wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, I didn't get messages Cc: ed, but have subscribed noew and
browsed
archive. ;)
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:14 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
(**) RADEON(0): *Mode 1400x1050: 108.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.8
Hz
(II) RADEON(0): Modeline
Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Actually, I didn't know earlier but the radeon should not continue but make X rather die as I
have AGP 9200 card, and that's actually the reason why I have to use ati as driver. The naming
is bad, but empirically I have figured out which drier works and aslo gives DRI.
The
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-2] Martin MOKREJ© wrote:
Martin MOKREJ© wrote:
Actually, I didn't know earlier but the radeon should not continue but make X
rather die as I have AGP 9200 card, and that's actually the reason why I have to use
ati as driver. The naming is bad, but
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-2] Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Martin MOKREJ wrote:
Actually, I didn't know earlier but the radeon should not continue but make X rather die as I
have AGP 9200 card, and that's actually the reason why I have to use ati as driver. The naming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(**) RADEON(0): *Mode 1400x1050: 108.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.8 Hz
(II) RADEON(0): Modeline 1400x1050 108.00 1400 34208 34320 1672 1050 1050 1053
1063
(**) RADEON(0): *Mode 1280x1024: 108.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.8 Hz
(II) RADEON(0):
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:14 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(**) RADEON(0): *Mode 1400x1050: 108.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.8
Hz
(II) RADEON(0): Modeline 1400x1050 108.00 1400 34208 34320 1672 1050 1050
1053 1063
(**) RADEON(0): *Mode 1280x1024: 108.0
