Hey
I just build the 4.3.99.7 snapshot this afternoon, and did not notice and
problems with the building process. X started normally and for a while
usage seemed normal.
But when I started up AMSN and tried to send someone a message, I
simply couldnt get any text to enter into the inpt box. I
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 04:49 am, E. ALLAUD wrote:
On 2003.06.27 12:05, Andrew Bevitt wrote:
Hey
0
I just build the 4.3.99.7 snapshot this afternoon, and did not notice
and
problems with the building process. X started normally and for a while
usage seemed normal.
But when I started up
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did the log file say that it had actually been disabled? According to the
XF86Config man page (of 4.3.0), this option should go in the ServerFlags
section, which is where I have successfully used it before. You might want
to try putting
4.3.99.8 release snapshot has resolved this error
No idea why but it works.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
You can try to substitute cc -c by cc -E and look at the produced code.
That only prints out a whole load of code and includes to the terminal.
From what I can see its no different to the code in the files and doesnt
really give me any clues.
xf86I2CFindDev is defined in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/i2c/xf86i2c.h
which is included in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h
The -E output should help determine why
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.c
is not seening this definition.
It does see it.
Pipe it into less and search for I2CDevPtr - see if it is defined weirdly
as a typedef.
All I can see is
typedef struct _I2CDevRec *I2CDevPtr;
Which looks ok to me, even searching back through the _I2CDevRec
listings is looking ok aswell.
___
Devel
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:07 am, Kirk Haderlie wrote:
Is it possible to debug XFree86 using a dual monitor setup on a single
machine. I tried using -keeptty but this doesn't do what I would expect.
Can X be run on one monitor and a debug console on the other?
If you have _two_ video devices that
Hi,
Im looking into why the Xserver starts with niceness -1 when started as root.
Ive tracked the occurance down to these lines in xinit.c
#ifdef PRIO_PROCESS
setpriority( PRIO_PROCESS, serverpid, -1 );
#endif
PRIO_PROCESS is a kernel header include which is defined indefintely,
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 04:14, Tim Roberts wrote:
The X server always runs as root, even when launched by a user. It's
required for I/O access.
Granted, but then why does the prioirty get set to 0 (lowest user definable
priority) when started as a user? If its running as root then it
is there a valid reason for why /dev/tty0 is chown'ed?
(I know the current terminal is chowned but thats understandable)
Thanks
Andrew Bevitt
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
for me, my kernel is not built with ipv6 support either.
My build is definately done with -DPART_NET .. but a little greping in the
xc/config directory doenst show any *bsd implementation of this though.
Andrew Bevitt
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
better access to interfaces provided
by external shared libraries.
Thats fine but essentially it comes down to determining what to load without
the user having to specify this manually, which is where the current dlloader
model breaks down.
Andrew Bevitt
cursor moved with it :)
Thanks
Andrew Bevitt
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
configurable devices that can and can't operate on the server, the
multiuser patch only works if you dont have a kernel driven USB keyboard as
your 2ND device!!!
Andrew Bevitt
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo
15 matches
Mail list logo