mailto:donaldjs...@gmail.com] *En nombre de
> *Donald
> Jackson
> *Enviado el:* Miércoles, 19 de Octubre de 2016 05:09 a.m.
>
> *Para:* José Héctor Galimberti
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist
> *Asunto:* Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Sorry I don't under
Octubre de 2016 05:09 a.m.
Para: José Héctor Galimberti
CC: kannel_dev_mailinglist
Asunto: Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
Sorry I don't understand what you mean
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016, José Héctor Galimberti
<ingenie...@conexioncelular.com.mx> wrote:
Theres a way to m
Para:* José Héctor Galimberti
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist
> *Asunto:* Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Hi Jose,
>
>
>
> Please check out https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox (read
> README carefully)
>
>
>
> 1) If you have an
Asunto: Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
Hi Jose,
Please check out https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox (read
README carefully)
1) If you have an HTTP application that can perform these tasks (routing, etc)
you can already do this with pluginbox + the HTTP plugin
Hi Jose,
Please check out https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox (read
README carefully)
1) If you have an HTTP application that can perform these tasks (routing,
etc) you can already do this with pluginbox + the HTTP plugin.
The plugin is written to deal with requests in an
Hello Donald / Devel list I hope to see this plugin soon on the addon
repository of kannel.
1) Is this something worthwhile doing, does anyone else have a need for this?
Yes, i think on at least 2 features that I can do in my current implementation
of kannel
1.- Dynamic Prefix
What exactly do the done() and callback() functions in the plugin structure?
Are they required?
== Rene
Van: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] Namens Donald Jackson
Verzonden: vrijdag 7 oktober 2016 11:50
Aan: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [RFC] Ne
Hi everyone (again),
Thank you for the great feedback yesterday (publicly and privately).
I have updated the repository here:
https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox
And have included the HTTP plugin as promised with an example of how to
modify and reject traffic. If you have any
gt;
CC: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
That could be possible too, we would just need to expose some methods for
injection of messages from the plugins.
Currently the only mechanisms they have are event driven (on Msg received from
a Box
taining plugin compatibility.
>
>
>
> == Rene
>
>
>
> *Van:* donaldjs...@gmail.com [mailto:donaldjs...@gmail.com] *Namens *Donald
> Jackson
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 6 oktober 2016 11:26
> *Aan:* Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist &
Jackson
Verzonden: donderdag 6 oktober 2016 13:02
Aan: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
CC: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
Hi Rene,
OK. I am familiar with SMPPBox (have written plugins too ;)) which is why I wa
t;
> == Rene
>
>
>
> *Van:* donaldjs...@gmail.com [mailto:donaldjs...@gmail.com] *Namens *Donald
> Jackson
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 6 oktober 2016 11:26
> *Aan:* Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
> *Onderwerp:* Re:
*CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Hi Rene,
>
>
>
> Glad to have saved you some work :)
>
>
> Could you explain what you mean about making it compatible with SMPPBox
> plugin archite
Donald Jackson
Verzonden: donderdag 6 oktober 2016 11:26
Aan: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
CC: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
Hi Rene,
Glad to have saved you some work :)
Could you explain what you mean
t;
> == Rene
>
>
>
>
>
> *Van:* devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] *Namens *Donald Jackson
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 6 oktober 2016 9:25
> *Aan:* kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
> *Onderwerp:* [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Hi
.
== Rene
Van: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] Namens Donald Jackson
Verzonden: donderdag 6 oktober 2016 9:25
Aan: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Onderwerp: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
Hi everyone,
I have started laying the foundations for a ne
Hi Kyriacos,
Thanks for your comments, in response:
1) The purpose of the 'initial' plugin is not to provide any specific
feature, but to demonstrate how to implement a plugin and how to modify all
fields of a message packet. If you (or another person) wished to build an
XML router this would be
Hi,
First thought, yep would be really useful as for me it would allow
removing the (or at least some) sms routing logic from the backend
application and keep it within kannel, where it logically fits better.
Additional thoughts:
1) Although HTTP as the initial plugin provides something
Hi everyone,
I have started laying the foundations for a new 'box' for Kannel which
intends to allow users more flexibility in terms of the platform.
At the moment there are many ways to get messages into the bearerbox,
namely: smsbox, wapbox, opensmppbox, smppbox, ksmppd, sqlbox. Some rely on
19 matches
Mail list logo