On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:12:26AM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
We have lost developers who might have been valuable to us by not giving
them CVS access. I'm afraid to say that from the outside it appears
that if David had been able
On Monday 27 October 2003 03:43 am, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
The fact remains that there are developers out there who without CVS
access, who those who don't know the facts think could be making an
even bigger contribution if they did have access.
Nice post, but I couldn't parse the last
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that can be handled
quickly, or try to
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 19:53, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 17:13, Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite reasonable, in my opinion.
-Peter
___
Devel
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 02:34:02PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Seriously, I don't know why I waste my time submitting patches that are
specific to my platform and then wait up to three weeks for them to be
committed. It is
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite reasonable, in my opinion.
He
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite reasonable, in my opinion.
On the
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of
Craig,
Craig Groeschel wrote:
I'm afraid your rants and threats won't do
much good there though.
Great. Shoot the messenger. (btw, No one is ranting or
threatening. Just being lucid and assertive. IMHO.)
Thanks for your support. I have tried, and failed on occasion, to
maintain my
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Well, you know, XFree86's disregard for offers to help made by
developers that have been with the project for over two years are
certainly part of the problem.
Err, this is about bug triage, which you can
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Well, you know, XFree86's disregard for offers to help made by
developers that have been with the project for over two years are
certainly part of the problem.
Err, this is about bug
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 02:34:02PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Seriously, I don't know why I waste my time submitting patches that are
specific to my platform and then wait up to three weeks for them to
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite reasonable, in my
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Seriously, I don't know why I waste my time submitting patches that are
specific to my platform and then wait up to three weeks for them to be
committed. It is a waste of my time and an insult that I am made to do
well, when you graduate and
Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 17:13, Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Learn something new every day :-). Looks like the subscriber list
is publicly viewable (and very small).
Where? I see nothing here:
http://xfree86.org/lists.html
I also get nothing when I try to forge a link to the list:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that can be handled
quickly, or try to assign them to an expert on
Harold L Hunt II writes:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does an email go out to everyone with CVS
commit access? Is there a single person that receives this email?
Should I be assigning patches to a specific person to ensure
Harold L Hunt II writes:
So, who wants to handle a high volume of patches specific to Cygwin
after the 4.4.0 branch? Any volunteers? I would appreciate someone
that can commit to a 24 to 48 hour turnaround on committing submitted
patches that don't touch other platforms.
I usually
Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that can be handled
quickly, or try to assign
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does an email go out to everyone with CVS
commit access? Is there a single person that receives this email?
Should I be assigning patches to
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does an email go out to everyone with CVS
commit access? Is there a single person that receives
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:55PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does an email go out to
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:55PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does an
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Where? I see nothing here:
http://xfree86.org/lists.html
I also get nothing when I try to forge a link to the list:
http://www.xfree86.org/mailman/listinfo/developer/
Is there a different mailing list server for bugs.xfree86.org?
Yes, it is
29 matches
Mail list logo
