Re: [Development] Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android

2013-01-12 Thread Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil
Hi, I think there will have to be further discussion around this. Ministro was initially written to be a common-purpose library distribution, not exclusively used for Qt libraries. It would be like depending on apt or something like that. More discussion is needed to decide how to proceed with

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-12 Thread Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil
Note that with some tweaking, it is already quite possible to build statically or bundle the libraries you want as part of your .apk if you're not worried about the library size. We probably won't make a out-of-the-box-solution for this for the Qt 5.1 release, since it just doesn't fit in the

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-12 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:22:31 +0400, Denis Shienkov wrote: A cross platform compatible API for the serial port is a useful thing, but is there a good reason for limiting it to Qt applications ? Why do you think that this is a limitation? Well, an application using wxWidgets probably wouldn't

[Development] The future of the Ministro brand on Android (was: Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android)

2013-01-12 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
Hi, As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand when a Qt app is deployed to an Android device. This tool is called

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com wrote: About protecting against unexpected behavior: I think this will be an issue anyway, since you're depending on several shared libraries in the platform in addition to Qt, and they can all

Re: [Development] QML and QAbstractListModel

2013-01-12 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 01/10/2013 05:46 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: I'd like to make C++ models more usable from QML; in the net there are several blog posts illustrating how to achieve that, but IMHO it would be better if at least some of these handy features were in QAbstractListModel itself: - count

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.dewrote: In general I see 2 reasons why a lib should be using Qt: 1) The implementation has a significant benefit from using Qt 2) The API needs to use Qt classes to be usable in a comfortable way in a Qt application As

[Development] Visual Studio 2010 Project of minimal QT 5.0

2013-01-12 Thread Mumtaz Ahmad
I have made Visual Studio 2010 Project of minimal QT 5.0. I needed it since i was not able to generate Visual Studio Project files from configure script. It is debug version and one can understand the flow of QT by using the excellent debugging features provided in Visual studio. Please mail me

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-12 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi Uwe, First, QtSerialPort closely linked to the Qt event-loop subsystem with using fully async signal/slots concept. This allows you to not use a separate thread to monitor I/O events. By the way: what are the major differences between QtSerialPort and the qextserialport project ? IMHO,

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.dewrote: Hi Denis + Laszlo, IMHO, this for QextSerialPort: do not see any features. QextSerialPort is pretty old ( from the 90s ) and the fact that it isn't really a Qt library is probably the reason why it has survived

[Development] Re: Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-12 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Saturday, 12 January 2013 15:13:49 CEST, Uwe Rathmann wrote: the serial port and a plot library are a very natural combination and the idea of a special plot widget that is tailored to display values from the serial port has been discussed several times. Armchair serial port user here. If

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

2013-01-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.comwrote: Hi all, Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show cases of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos in the source code, including a pretty

Re: [Development] QT5.0 does not create VC2010 Projects

2013-01-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 12 de janeiro de 2013 12.22.59, Mumtaz Ahmad wrote: Is it known issue that QT5.0 does not create VC2010 Projects? No. Can you report the issue, complete with steps to reproduce it, on the bugtracker? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel

[Development] QtCreator Generic Linux Device plugin questions

2013-01-12 Thread a.gra...@gmail.com
Hi, I'm trying to understand how the Generic Linux Device plugin of QtCreator works and I've some questions to ask, to understand if it already does what I need or if I need to fork it and customize for my needs. For some weeks I could not work to this and now I will try to restart from where I

[Development] Next Minsitro version features

2013-01-12 Thread BogDan
Hello,    As many of you may already know, we (necessitas and qt-project) join the forces to port some of the Qt5 modules on Android in time for Qt 5.1 release. Sadly, Ministro, is not yet prepared to handle two versions of Qt at the same time, and it needs some love to do it. This my to do

Re: [Development] The future of the Ministro brand on Android (was: Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android)

2013-01-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens jens.bache-w...@digia.com wrote: That said, I am not sure I am entirely ok with this. I would like a single repository for quality tested Qt libraries and not an arbitrary collection of open source libraries of various quality that any

Re: [Development] QML and QAbstractListModel

2013-01-12 Thread Nils Jeisecke
Hi, what about adding a new Quick item for enhanced QAbstractItemModel access. ListModelAdapter { id: myModelAdapter sourceModel: myModel } ListView { model: myModelAdapter.sourceModel delegate: Text { MouseArea { onClicked: console.log(myModelAdapter.data(model.index, myRole)

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-12 Thread d3fault
Random idea: can't we use Android's Services API to do a QtLibrariesFolderPathRequest, and only the first Android-Qt application (with the 'Ministro-built-in', building on OP's idea) that gets an empty/null string from the service request goes on to download the libraries to it's local folder and

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-12 Thread d3fault
Sorry for double post, but I thought up a solution to the wasted bandwidth con (by using the SD card as a download cache). Bleh. Basically on null/empty folder path we then proceed to check some SD card download cache to copy the libs to the local dir and set up the service provider. If they