Has anyone tried to grab some traces (tcpdump) of this in action? A
I did when trying to diagnose why dhcpd would not assign addresses on a
second interface.
Packets were coming in, but dhcpd never replied.
dhcp-3 worked.
Ciao,
Filippo
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 03:01, Charlie Brady wrote:
If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso. To be very brief they essentially took
a disto (SGI XFS) and added all the e-smith rpms that the distro did not
include by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I got that phrase directly from the gnu site?
Sure--on the FDL itself. You left out one important word when you
took that phrase for your howto--verbatim copies of this *license*
document.
hi all :)
ive come across a very wierd occurance in a script im working on. basically
i want the variable $host to equal the hostname of the current server. to
get this set i use $host = db_get(\%conf, SystemName); (see below).
the weird thing is the value of $host wont show up on a webpage,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote:
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The licensing conditions on your documentation are inconsistent.
I got that phrase directly from the gnu site?
Is that a question or a statement? :-)
Yes, the FSF site does state: The standard copyright notice
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Peter Werner wrote:
the weird thing is the value of $host wont show up on a webpage, but will
show up when the script is run from the command line.
Will show up when the script is run from the command line, as root.
Won't, when run as admin, IINM. Make sure that your
Hi Darrell
Just had a quick look and the add-on!
As per usual great work... will test over the next few days!
-Original Message-
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February 2002 05:12
To: e-smith-devinfo
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME
hello charlie
perms was it, see my comment about missing something silly.
if you're ever in sydney i owe you a beer :)
thanks heaps
-pete
--
I have uncovered the very fabric of the universe. It appears to be
a kind of gingham tweed with a cross cable stitch
IFOST: http://www.ifost.org.au -
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Peter Werner wrote:
hello charlie
perms was it, see my comment about missing something silly.
if you're ever in sydney i owe you a beer :)
See you just before Easter then! :-)
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network
Graeme, Des
Your comments were appreciated and will be reflected on.
Thanks,
--
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://netsourced.com
http://myEZserver.com
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Des Dougan wrote:
I also think it's about time both of you made a constructive effort to be
polite to each other.
I believe that I have always been polite to Darrell. Please point out to
me (off-list) any particular occasion when you believe that I have been
impolite, and
David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I used the following procedure to upgrade my SME v5.1.2 *test*server to
a
2.4.9-21 RedHat kernel:
David, many thanks for taking the time to put this mini-Howto together. I
might have some time over the weekend to give it a try myself.
I do have a general
Greg,
I've always wondered why the Samba team packages Samba into one RPM when
Red Hat comes out of the box as three RPMs. Well, here's why they do it:
Thanks for posting this info. I, too, have always wondered why
RH did it differently from the Samba team.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan York,
Des wrote:
its priorities, but I do agree with Greg that a roadmap would at least
assist in providing a context to development discussions.
Charlie wrote:
I'm not sure who could provide a roadmap, or how much value it would add.
I don't have any call over what any of you folks do, and I
This is my first attempt as well at messing with kernel and stuff. But
thanks to a great starting point by David Brown and a little bit of spare
time I have enhanced the howto for Upgrading the kernel to a 2.4 kernel. I
went back to 2.4.7 in order to keep the smp, BOOT, and regular kernel the
Isn't the reason RH packages samba in three packages the same reason for
splitting up telnet, etc? If the computer is intended as a client there's no
reason for a telnet server. Samba packaging is a little more of a grey area
since the client could share files. Perhaps it's just easier to
Shad L. Lords [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is my first attempt as well at messing with kernel and stuff.
Looks like a fabulous first attempt to me Shad. Great job! I just wish I
had time to try this. Maybe by the weekend.
Regards,
--
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://netsourced.com
On Thursday, February 07, 2002, Darrell May wrote:
David, many thanks for taking the time to put this mini-Howto together. I
might have some time over the weekend to give it a try myself.
No problem at all. I'd appreciate it if other people would try this out and
verify that it works for
David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Don't take this the wrong way, but who cares? Now let me qualify that.
:)
No worries. Your point is an excellent one. We might have to try both
ways. I was only hoping to seek advice from those that have already gone
there before to share with us their
From the work I have done trying to get PPTP working with the 2.4 kernel I
think that the ppp.o and ppp_mppe.o modules that exist in the
/lib/modules/2.2.19-7.0.8-e-smith/net directory are going to need to be
recompiled for the new version of the kernel (2.4.7 or 2.4.9). Is there
anyone out
Well, I'm going to mess with taking the latest RedHat 7.2 versions of all
the packages on the SME v5.1.2 disk and make a custom iso to install a
To give you a heads up,
I tried to build a custom iso cd of the 5..2 release and had lots of
problems.
First, the RedHat directory generally in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'is this the _best_ way to go?'
Best in the sense of being the most comprehensive, complete,
compatible way of doing things? Probably not. From that
perspective, it's probably better to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
First, the RedHat directory generally in the RedHat cd was rename to
e-smith
That one is easy. I build custom isos daily. When I give you the answer
don't scream too loud
Change to the base directory of your iso copy. Let's say if your copy is
located at
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, David Brown wrote:
Here's the biggest problem (as has already been stated several
times): even if we get all the latest up to date RedHat 7.2 packages up
and
running.
I guess I should read what I post before I post it. :) What I meant to say
was:
Here's the biggest
David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
we still need masq modules for pptp, ipsec, realaudio, h323, icq, and
Agreed, they are extremely valuable to those that do use and need them.
However, from another viewpoint, many small business SME users don't use
them, don't need them and therfore won't
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote:
However, from another viewpoint, many small business SME users don't use
them, don't need them and therfore won't even miss them.
This is especially true for servers running in serveronly mode.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:43 PM
To: David Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo
David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
we still need masq modules for
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is especially true for servers running in serveronly mode.
Absolutely, ... how did I miss that great example! Definitely not needed
there and that takes care of most of the larger SME corporate clients where
corporate firewalls/VPN are already in
-Original Message-
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Charlie Brady; Darrell May
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, David Brown wrote:
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is especially true for servers running in serveronly mode.
Absolutely, ... how did I miss that great example! Definitely not needed
there and that takes care of most of the larger SME corporate
Does anybody have any use for a Rescue Partition on the hard drive? It
would be used for rescuing the system when the root partition is corrupted
and fails to boot.
It could also be used to revert a system back to factory specs.
Any thoughts on the idea?
Trev.
--
Please report bugs to
I'm a newbie at Linux development. I've been watching this list for several months,
and finally think I may have something to contribute.
I work for a state funded organization that started pushing the idea of an SME server
to our school districts as an easy to use content filter with Trevor
I have pretty much completed the forms overlay system how-to. This is
currently running on three production servers. All of the appropriate
files are housed in a single zip file.
The only item left is to recompile the overlay source files on my RedHat
7.2 development machine when I return from
If someone is looking for a starting place, you may want to check out the
External IP Alias Panel that I wrote.
Obviously, it will have to be modified to solve Abe's problem, but I have
made some headway so far.
ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/TrevorOuellette/RPMS/noarch/
Trev.
From: Trevor Ouellette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Does anybody have any use for a Rescue Partition on the hard drive? It
would be used for rescuing the system when the root partition is corrupted
and fails to boot.
It could also be used to revert a system back to factory specs.
I'd
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, anyone find the src.rpm for the anacronda that was used to
build the cd?
It'll soon show up with all the other src.rpms from the 5.1.2
distribution. It was omitted because it's not in the RPMS directory, so
was missing from my list.
Trevor Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anybody have any use for a Rescue Partition on the hard drive? It
would be used for rescuing the system when the root partition is
corrupted
and fails to boot.
It could also be used to revert a system back to factory specs.
Any thoughts on
Trevor/Darrel,
We use Altiris Deployment Server to manage our Win9X wstns..
This has something called bootworks which is said to be
resident in a partition(or sector) marked as bad so doesnt
show up in Windows. They use this to boot first into dos, connect
via smb to the server and look for
the Aries server by Celestic has a function like this - 2 diffrent boot
options, one boots off a diffrent partition and extracts a darball over
either the system or data partition, restoring it to factory defaults.
The other idea i had was to make the rescue disk a standard ISO9660
bootable
Abe Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm a newbie at Linux development. I've been watching this list for
several months, and finally think I may have something to contribute.
Hi Abe. Welcome to the list :-)
I'm also looking for feedback: Am I going about this the best way?
Well on a
{experimental] COMPLETED UNTESTED!
Sorry folds but I do not have a spare server at the moment to test this.
Treat this as completely experimental. In fact let me guarantee to you that
it will not work, then you will not be disappointed ;-
For those wishing to continue, this simply adds a
41 matches
Mail list logo
