Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some thoughts on e-smith's Purpose and Architecture

2003-12-12 Thread Richard Morrell
Dub Dublin wrote: I'm going to take a shot at identifying a few things that we all agree on (or at least that I think we *should* agree on), and one or two that are not so consensual. 1. E-smith is a *server* distribution No X, dev tools, etc. in the default distro, nor should there be. One

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-12 Thread Joseph Armstrong
- Original Message - From: Richard Morrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; e-smith-devinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss) Charlie is

[e-smith-devinfo] Missing SME 6.0 SRPMS (links)

2003-12-12 Thread Filippo Carletti
The pub/linux/distributions/e-smith/releases/6.0/SRPMS directory on all mirrors contains link to non existent files. See: lrwxrwxrwx 1 1001 1001 102 Dec 11 20:40 zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.src.rpm - /home/e-smith/files/ibays/library/files/distros/redhat/updates/7.3/en/os/SRP MS/zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.src.rpm

[e-smith-devinfo] e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?

2003-12-12 Thread Peter Schubert
Hi List, why we do not use sourceforge.net for e-smith/SME ? Best Peter Schubert -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?

2003-12-12 Thread Richard Morrell
Peter Schubert wrote: Hi List, why we do not use sourceforge.net for e-smith/SME ? Best Peter Schubert -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe,

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?

2003-12-12 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
Hi Peter, why we do not use sourceforge.net for e-smith/SME ? we're working on that ;-) Thanks, Hsing-Foo -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe,

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?

2003-12-12 Thread Jeff Coleman
-Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith/sme at sourceforge ? why we do not use sourceforge.net for e-smith/SME ? Peter Schubert Probably time for me to jump in here and give you an update as to what we have been doing at

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Missing SME 6.0 SRPMS (links)

2003-12-12 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Filippo Carletti wrote: The pub/linux/distributions/e-smith/releases/6.0/SRPMS directory on all mirrors contains link to non existent files. See: lrwxrwxrwx 1 1001 1001 102 Dec 11 20:40 zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.src.rpm -

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-12 Thread Ernesto Lorenz
Very well stated Charlie, I couldn't agree more. If the SME (e-smith) interest group accepts this as a fact I'm shure it's going to work. Regards, Ing. Ernesto Lorenz Consultores Lorcom, C.A. http://www.lorcom.cc Cel.: +58 (414) 245-4014; Tel./Fax: +58

[e-smith-devinfo] Custom ISO Howto

2003-12-12 Thread Greg Zartman
Anyone on devinfo: Has this processed change for creating custom SME ISOs? As root: 1 Install anaconda and anaconda-runtime rpms if you don't have them. 2 Copy e-smith/mitel in ~/cd1 3 chmod u+w ~/cd1/RedHat/base/hdlist 4 chmod u+w ~/cd1/RedHat/base/comps 5 REPLACE every rpm that you want to

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Custom ISO Howto

2003-12-12 Thread Jeff Coleman
Several things. 1. No anaconda rpms or src on mirrors yet 2. All src files are links and not really src files -jeff -Original Message- From: Greg Zartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Custom

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Custom ISO Howto

2003-12-12 Thread Jeff Coleman
Graeme, You are the man. This works like a charm. -jeff From: Graeme Seaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Coleman; 'Greg Zartman' Subject: Re:

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] E-smith to Debian?

2003-12-12 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
Hi TekUnsupported, (we would prefer real names though) Please visit contribs.org and subscribe to the lists over there, for discussion of the future direction on the distro will be discussed over there with all involved (future) developers. http://contribs.org http://contribs.org/forums

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] E-smith to Debian?

2003-12-12 Thread w9ya
Actually the mailmain or mailman doesn't have an html page yet, or so it is reporting. The other two appear to be working. Best regards; Bob Finch On Friday 12 December 2003 07:00 pm, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: Hi TekUnsupported, (we would prefer real names though) Please visit contribs.org

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] E-smith to Debian?

2003-12-12 Thread Jeff Coleman
Thanks Bob. The corrected url is: http://lists.contribs.org/mailman -jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] E-smith to Debian? Actually the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] E-smith to Debian?

2003-12-12 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
Actually the mailmain or mailman doesn't have an html page yet, or so it is reporting. http://contribs.org/mailmain Stupid me that, ofcourse, should be: http://lists.contribs.org/mailman Thanks, Hsing-Foo -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to