Re: Important Announcement: Freenet naming change

Hi Ian, I'll help answer that one: He is a long-standing volunteer who is one of the current Release Managers; He has also been helping me with system administration for the project and still has access to most systems to this day. The fact that you are not aware of it just goes to show how

Re: releasing next

On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 05:24 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Friday, March 16, 2018 08:32:42 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From my side, it’s finally time to create a release from next. The > > steps > > I see are: > > > > - ship jna.jar as new dependency and add it

Re: Gradle et al

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 22:11 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 10/01/18 21:51, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:36 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On 10/01/18 21:15, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:10 +, Matthe

Re: Gradle et al

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:36 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 10/01/18 21:15, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:10 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > So what is going on, and why? > > > > > > > > > > What's ha

Re: Gradle et al

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:10 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Could somebody summarise what the plans are, and what the reasons > behind > them are for: > > 1. Gradle, > > 2. Deployment/updating of JARs etc. > > I get the impression that this has been a major factor preventing > forward progress

Re: We need a fix for update.cmd

On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 22:43 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 19:24 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > &g

Re: We need a fix for update.cmd

On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 19:24 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > Months later he is asking for help supporting the windows version of > > the > > legacy script that has now been broken for years (we're pas

Re: We need a fix for update.cmd

On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 12:33 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 08/12/17 21:04, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The new windows installer is prepared, I can release any day, but > > there's still one critical piece missing: we need update.cmd fixed > > to at > > least download

Website update: call for help

Hi, I have done some work on the infrastructure behind the website recently; Here is a highlight of the changes: 1) new workflow: the staging website is back - pushes to https://github.com/freenet/website/tree/2016-redesign get deployed by travis (https://travis-ci.org/freenet/website) on

Re: Potential source of funding and bug finding

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:09 +, Freenet wrote: > To qualify for these rewards, a project needs to have a large user > base and/or be critical to global IT infrastructure. Which of those two requirements do you think that Freenet fulfils? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try

I will try to fill in the gaps ... On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 19:53 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > Original Message > > Subject: Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try > > Local Time: May 1, 2017 7:43 PM > > UTC Time: May 1, 2017 11:43 PM > > From: st...@asksteved.com > > To:

Re: HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

; > ¹: https://aws.amazon.com/government-education/nonprofits/?nc1=h_ls > That's on my TODO (after finishing the migration). Florent > On 11-04-2017 05:38, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 19:57 -0300, Fernando Mum

Re: HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 19:57 -0300, Fernando Mumbach wrote: > Hello, > Hi Fernando, Since no one is replying to you, I will attempt to... > downloads.freenetproject.org is still using the old cert, It is a feature, not a bug :) The plan was to drop that FQDN... and then at the last minute,

Re: Website quick-guide and snaglist

I have put a rewrite rule on the bucket; this shouldn't be necessary any more Florent On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 10:52 -0700, Dan Roberts wrote: > https://github.com/Ademan-laptop/freenet-website-redesign-pelican/comm > it/ae6b9c4e2d5f282a120abcfdd4a6c4216586f7e9 > > This addresses the snags in a

Re: HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 17:19 +, Ian Clarke wrote: >  On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 11:19 AM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetproje > ct.org wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 15:08 +, Ian wrote: > > >  Well, it's an improvement over what we have now even if it is > >

Re: HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

on't think it would be. This happened because we weren't using AWS yet. Our new setup is rock-solid and fairly standard: it's an S3 bucket where the content is served by cloudfront. Florent > Ian. > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 2:49 AM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetproject > .org w

Re: HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

I have made the DNS changes; these aren't the problem... The problem is that the content we serve from the new infrastructure isn't ready... almost a year in the making... so we have never finished the infrastructure switch. Whatever is pushed to

Re: [freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 09:48 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 13:30 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > [snip.] > > > > I am planning on making the switch this week- > > end unless I get a very good reason not to. > > I have now switch

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

om  wrote: > Hi Florent, > Thanks so much for putting that together. When I try to access  > staging.freenetproject.org  I get an "Access Denied" error. In the > past I recall > there being an authentication challenge, am I missing something? > Thanks,Dan > On Mar 15, 2

Re: [freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 13:30 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: [snip.] > > I am planning on making the switch this week- > end unless I get a very good reason not to. I have now switched the DNS records to use the new infrastructure; this will most likely be the first email from the

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

orent, > > > >  Thanks so much for putting that together. When I try to access > > staging.freenetproject.org I get an "Access Denied" error. In the > > past I > > recall there being an authentication challenge, am I missing > > something? >

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

I have deployed it on https://github.com/freenet/website/tree/2016-redesign It gets auto-built by CI when you push to it https://travis-ci.org/freenet/website and auto-deployed to: https://staging.freenetproject.org/ Florent On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 10:49 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote: > Hi Ian, >

Re: [freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 20:42 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 01:30:55 PM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > the unsubscription part (hopefully) dealt with by your MUA through > > the List > > Unsubscribe header > > I've thought some more a

Re: [freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 00:40 +, Freenet wrote: > Who are the 3rd parties and will they be accessible anonymously and > publicly? > Here is my current list: - http://gmane.org/ - http://n4.nabble.com/archive-your-mailing-list.html - https://marc.info/ - https://www.mail-archive.com/ The

Re: [freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 21:25 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > This looks good to me! > Thanks for your work on getting things done! > > One question: > > > Please do test the new infrastructure (connecting to the new MX > > records) > > and let me know if something doesn't feel right. > >

[freenet-dev] Email infrastructure

Hi, Most of you are already aware that we are moving away from our existing infrastructure soon. Part of the migration involves changes to the email setup and affects the Mailing lists. The "new" infrastructure is already in place but not yet in use (higher- priority MX records) and I am

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 20:59 -0600, Pascal wrote: > Yes, thank you, I was able to confirm that RSA is DOA in 1476.  1475 > and before only supported RSA so 1476 broke SSL for everyone, though I > doubt many people use it. > You are the first one to complain about it. > The bigger issue is why

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

It's because you are using a custom RSA certificate... and we don't have any RSA-compliant cipher in the new build. Either wait for next build (that might fix it) or get an ECDSA cert from letsencrypt. Florent PS: I think that we should switch to what others are doing cipher-wise:

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 19:04 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 09:03:07 AM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > Mailing lists and mail must keep working. > > > > If you want to be useful, compile a list of *all* the requirements; > > t

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 15:46 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 11:16:07 AM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > [snip.] > > > > > > I'd really like us to use AWS for as much as possible re: > > > > hosting.  It has a lo

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet social media links (was: Re: Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 18:32 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > Dan, > Given that any link is a de-facto endorsement, we shouldn't link to > any social > media page that isn't officially affiliated with the project. > For example, the @freenet Twitter handle is apparently controlled by > someone > with the

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 17:44 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > > On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > You are in lalaland if you think that we can do what currently do > > w

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:18 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > > > > > We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > > > > We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code has > > > nowadays been checked by at least two established users, and most

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 10:27 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > x...@freenetproject.org writes: > > That is unfortunately something our privacy-focused users will > > certainly not  > > accept :| > > We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code has > nowadays been checked by at

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

[snip.] > > I'd really like us to use AWS for as much as possible re: > > hosting.  It has a I'd really like us to use AWS for as much as possible re: hosting.  It has a > > lot of benefits, one of which is powerful multi-user support. > > Well I really don't care where we host as long as it

Re: [freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 18:40 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Dan Roberts writes: > > The website is fully static and should be fine with s3 + cloudflare. > > Do we actually need cloudflare for the hosting? Cloudflare doesn't provide hosting. > Would it be simpler

Re: [freenet-dev] MessageAuthCodeTest fails with the latest version of bcprov-jdk15on

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 15:56 +0200, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > Hi, > > I made a local Maven fork of the Freenet Fred project. Good luck with that. The plan is to use gradle going forward (have a look to what's on the branch called "next"). > One of my maven > dependencies is: > > >   

Re: [freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

nd up > > working with Florent to develop a lambda job, it should be pretty > > straight forward. > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > >  Dan, can you clarify the current plan for website hosti

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:56 +0100, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 08:54:20 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Hi, > >  > > Florent just warned again, that the clock on osprey (all our > > non-standard hosting) is ticking. If we don’t act, this means that > all > >

Re: [freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

We need to know what we are hosting before we can make any determination here... Last I've heard, the plan was to start with github's hosting facility and to put either cloudflare or cloudfront in front (since github doesn't do SSL). If it turns out that we have a fully static website, I suggest

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 08:54 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > Florent just warned again, that the clock on osprey (all our > non-standard hosting) is ticking. If we don’t act, this means that all > links to the wiki stop working. > This has never been expressed as a requirement

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 01:58 +0100, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > On 2016-12-17 12:59, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 19:13 +0100, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > > > Hi. Whonix [0] dev here. > > > > > > We are looking for a censor

Re: [freenet-dev] Status of web redesign?

On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 10:44 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote: > It is my impression that retaining our transifex translations is a > requirement. I don't think so (we are supposed to re-write/de-clutter the content!); and even if it was, I think that you are going the wrong way about it. Transifex

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 19:13 +0100, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Hi. Whonix [0] dev here. > > We are looking for a censorship-resistant and decentralized way to  > communicate notifications about critical situations [1] to our users > and  > host the project metadata and files themselves to

Re: [freenet-dev] Status of web redesign?

> > later. > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Ian Clarke <i...@freenetproject.org > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freen > > > etproj

Re: [freenet-dev] Status of web redesign?

On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 13:40 +, Ian Clarke wrote: >  Hey guys, it's been quite a while at this point, and we're still > stuck with the old website. > What's the current status of getting the new site up? I can't make any progress until there is something to deploy... I haven't heard from Dan.

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: [announce-crypto] BC Security Advisory (was: Strange result with modular math functions)

We use cached-ephemeral DH... but not always BC's implementation... "it's complicated" Not worth loosing sleep over it IMHO; we will just ensure that next build will ship with the yet-to-be-released fixed version of BC. Florent On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 19:19 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > I

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

There is a misunderstanding here... either we can satisfy ourselves with github pages' version of jekyll and plugins... or we won't use jekyll at all. The last thing we need is a jekyll plugin that we can't use on github pages! Ian has arranged for the project to have a debit card ... so now we

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 11:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 03/11/16 05:52, Dan Roberts wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Florent Daigniere < > > nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Do you have any plan to handle

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 01:05 -0700, Dan Roberts wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Florent Daigniere > <nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:37 -0700, Dan Roberts wrote: > > > At this point I consider the hosting platform to a b

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:37 -0700, Dan Roberts wrote: > At this point I consider the hosting platform to a blocker for > completing the website redesign. You shouldn't. > Shall I proceed for the moment assuming that we're using github > pages?  Yes; We might put something in front, but that's

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

; things up? > Ian. >   Yes, AWS is something I've practised recently and it won't be a problem... The only real question is how we will deal with the billing (few cents a month but it has to be paid by card). Florent > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 12:37 PM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenet

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

in the past). Florent On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 18:33 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: > My favourite solution would be based on AWS: > > S3 for storage, cloudfront as a CDN in front > > A Lambda function to trigger rebuilds when the bucket is updated (or > an > api-endpoint we'd

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 16:58 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > I guess another possibility we can consider, at least as an interim > step, is to > host the static site on our existing server.  This would at-least > allow us to > get the new site up quickly, but of course it wouldn't solve the > headache

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

My favourite solution would be based on AWS: S3 for storage, cloudfront as a CDN in front A Lambda function to trigger rebuilds when the bucket is updated (or an api-endpoint we'd get github to trigger on commit) As for the static-page generator, I am allergic to ruby's ecosystem. Not because

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 10:39 -0500, Ian wrote: > My last status update from Dan was on Oct 14th and was as-follows: > > Just wanted to give you a status update. The design is 95% done, I > have a > > few tweaks to make, and all of the existing english content is > > ported. The > > translation

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 10:20 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetp > roject.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 17:12 +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > I'm glad it is. It's been three months

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 18:48 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > I agree, provided that this doesn't bog down the process, I would hope > to have > the new site up in 2 weeks or less. > Ian. > That was 8 weeks ago; have we made any progress? Florent signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 17:12 +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > What's wrong is not just the current > > funding allocation fiasco (who will ever consider sponsoring us, now > > that we've shown that we don't even know what to do with the money > we have?). > >  > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 14:33 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 12:49 AM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetproje > ct.org > wrote: > In any case the result is inferior to the current solution. It will: > - require user-interaction (and an ugly UX element) to

Re: [freenet-dev] Internationalization on the new site

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 20:19 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > I posted a question to Reddit about how we can internationalize a > Github Pages > site, there are a few answers already: > https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/57gjpj/what_are_bestpractices > _for_localization_of_a/ > Thoughts? > You've

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 4

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 07:31 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Florent Daigniere < > nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 11:06 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 4

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 11:06 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 1:42 PM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetprojec > t.org > wrote:Here is mine: > > CHK@3agNaxNNV~eqIof8vwQbzF- > iaBQwShyAvDGyG77TCds,2pc1hFAH3HaEVZBbkzYumtK > > V~drCRtGFjdG8QuyY-V0,AAMC--8/Freen

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

For l10n there are two different problems: 1) getting the translation from the translators I don't know much about that part so I'll defer to those who know (I think we use transifex). 2) serving the right translation to the user The current website generates pages for all languages... and

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 4

On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 18:11 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > Hereby we begin the 4th stage of the financial allocation poll. > > You may participate by filling your estimates in to this spreadsheet > and > mailing it back: >

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 19:46 +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote: > An alternative would be to deploy CI tools along github-pages; that > will do all of the above for us (at which point I don't care about > the language or technology picked)... but that needs to be budgeted > for too.

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 09:51 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 2:19 AM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetprojec > t.org > wrote: > On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > > After that, I have identified a number of coders who can t

Re: [freenet-dev] Winning design selected

On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > After that, I have identified a number of coders who can take these > files, > convert to HTML, and then publish them on Github using https://jekyll > rb.com/. Any particular reason for that ruby-based tool? We're using python everywhere

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 05:43 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Florent Daigniere < > nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 00:47 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > > > Hereby we be

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 00:47 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > Hereby we begin the 3rd stage of the financial allocation poll. > > You may participate by filling your votes in to this spreadsheet and > mailing it back: > https://github.com/xor-freenet/freenet-money-poll/archive/2016-stage3 >

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 12:41 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 08/02/2016 06:47 PM, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Hereby we begin the 3rd stage of the financial allocation poll. > > I'm surprised there's nothing in here about improving packaging or > installers. I thought I added it

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 22:31 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 08/12/2016 04:00 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:28 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > > > Why don't you set a date since you're the one that would do it? > > >

[freenet-dev] Changes to the HTTPs headers

Hi, Since we will be moving away from hosting our own website, I have changed the max-age value of both "Public-Key-Pins" and "Must-Staple" to zero... from 182 days. I have left the "Strict-Transport-Security" one as is. Obviously this is not perfect, and browsers that don't visit our website

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 22:12 +0200, Bert Massop wrote: > Op 12 aug. 2016 22:00 schreef "Florent Daigniere" < > nextg...@freenetproject.org>: > > > > > > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:28 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > > > W

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:28 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > Why don't you set a date since you're the one that would do it? I have created https://github.com/freenet/wiki/wiki ... and will remove the old wikis as soon as we deploy the new website design. > Can you clarify what you are suggesting? >

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 14:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 3:37 AM, Florent Daigniere > nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > It's not like if there was no history here... > > > I'm really not clear on what point you're trying to make… > Ian. > T

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 00:02 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 5:53 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de > wrote:As long as there is no one who pledges to transition the whole > wiki and > > has a history of delivering on his or her pledges, transitioning the > wiki is a dumb

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

sult you? > I can at least tell you that nobody else needs to waste his time in > reading this if you don't feel like reading it. It contains > information primarily valuable for Florent. > If that's the case, why are you posting it on a mailing list?  (again logic) > On Monday,

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 07:16 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > This is why Ian is talking about "a ground-up redesign". What's > > suggested is that it won't be a "migration". > > Exactly.  We need to start fresh with the structure and the copy, > keeping the main site much more focussed on educating

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 00:38 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Sunday, August 07, 2016 01:12:17 PM Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > Improvements are great, but the website requires a ground-up > > redesign by a > > professional designer. Unless a suitable professional designer > > volunteers to

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 00:11 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Sunday, August 07, 2016 08:24:59 AM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > > > > > > I've also voted for that. > > > > > > So in other words: I am totally willing to deal with fundraisin

Re: [freenet-dev] Porting website FAQ to the wiki

On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 17:24 -0400, Stephen Oliver wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As discussed earlier on IRC, I have ported all of the FAQ content > from the freenetproject.org website over to our wiki, merged with the > existing FAQ page[1]. > > I have also opened a related pull request[2] that

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 18:17 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > Well, I have Florent criticizing me for being too democratic, and Xor > criticising me for not being democratic enough, so how about if you > guys just debate it directly. > Ian. > That came out wrong... I have no problem with you attempting

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 10:55 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetp > roject.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 09:42 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > It is certainly true that I'm preoccupied with other thin

[freenet-dev] About the project

The project is in terrible shape due to the lack of leadership, and most of it boils down to the fact that you're just not around (I'm sure you're busy with other things). What's wrong is not just the current funding allocation fiasco (who will ever consider sponsoring us, now that we've shown

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:16 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide e> > wrote: > > > > > > > Ian writes: > > > > > > Please be more specific.  You've said a lot of things, most of > > > which I > > > found unpersuasive or just plain

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 18:53 +0200, Bert Massop wrote: > On 03-08-16 00:47, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Hereby we begin the 3rd stage of the financial allocation poll. > > > > You may participate by filling your votes in to this spreadsheet > > and > > mailing it back: > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 16:41 +, l...@mail2tor.com wrote: >  You should leave voting to users. >  Or not. I'm far from convinced that users should be the ones who vote here :) We're on a developer mailing-list after all... and "I want a poney" isn't something we can deliver on. It's clear to

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 00:58 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: Here are my own votes: https://github.com/xor-freenet/freenet-money-poll/archive/2016- stage3-xor.zip I've added a "Comment" column which explains my choices in detail. Ian (I presume) has set ground rules, I'll just take two of

Re: [freenet-dev] Proposal for a democratic process to efficiently allocate resources (including the $25k)

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 18:58 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > I've written a proposal for how we can do this, based on my learnings > over a > decade and a half of managing software projects (mostly commercial). > Feedback from the core team has been positive so-far, with the main > objection > being

Re: [freenet-dev] Linux installer sig file for build 1475 is missing

On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 01:24 -0700, CryptNode wrote: > The Linux installer and signature for build 1475 are missing from > https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/ although it > looks > like only the sig file is normally listed. The installer link works >

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1475 released - verify build failed

cont...@cryptnode.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This build is failing for me. Log file attached. > > > > > > > You log file unfortunately did not arrive here. Can try to send > > > it again, > > > or upload it somewh

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1475 released

On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 18:29 +0200, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote: > Nice. Where's the website link to the press release, so that not only > mailing list audience aka insiders take notice of the good news, but > everyone and > people can start spreading the news? > I don't know; have you filled in a

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1475 released

nerTracker   Fix a corner case in BloomFilter length   NodeStats: reduce code duplication in request location tracking   Fix parsing of Java versions >= 9 (JEP-223)   Force stripping ECDSA signature padding: BC 1.54 has retarded checks Florent Daigniere (86):   Remove the DS

Re: [freenet-dev] Request: scripts for fetch-pull (retrievability) stats

On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 13:22 +0200, Bert Massop wrote: > There used to be a daily updated fetch-pull stats freesite [0], but > digger3 > appears to have stopped maintaining it quite some time ago. > > Having statistics on the retrievability of data is essential in > gauging the > network's routing

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1473 released

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 08:21 +0200, Bert Massop wrote: > Great work, thank you all. > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide .de> wrote: > > > * Use BouncyCastle's DSA implementation. This improves security > > > and > > >   reduces custom code. > > > > I saw

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre4

signature padding: BC 1.54 has retarded checks Florent Daigniere (1):   Merge branch 'bertm-strip-padding-for-bouncycastle' into next signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre3

13 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) Changes from 1475-pre2: Bert Massop (1):   Fix parsing of Java versions >= 9 (JEP-223) Florent Daigniere (6):   Revert "Save a redirect when fetching BC"   Don't use FOAF if HTL<2   Merge branch 'dont-FOAF-at-low-HTL' in

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre2

;does not provide FCP" info about plugins The rest is not-user-visible improvements... We've managed to get rid of ~2kLOC! :) Changes from 1475-pre1: --- Bert Massop (2):   Cleanup KeyListenerTracker   NodeStats: reduce code duplication in request location tracking Florent Dai

  1   2   3   4   >