Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-03 Thread Christopher William Turner
Ian Clarke wrote: Great, but should be be deprecating any of the old stuff? I would rather not keep broken code lying around if we can help it. There is nothing broken left in... Except that I was unhappy that one conf value could override another. I would rather force the user to comment

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-02 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 04:04, Oskar wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:26:59PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: On Monday 01 July 2002 20:21, you wrote: ... I have read in one post that there is a limit of 60 requests per minute. It is almost 100 times slower than node could handle

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-02 Thread Christopher William Turner
My average bandwidth throttled node settles down to exactly track its defined long-term weekly traffic limits. Any nodes in contact with it will be slowed to match it (if they don't lose patience and timeout). They don't get rejected. Currently serverSockets get created with a fixed backlog of

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Christopher William Turner wrote: My average bandwidth throttled node settles down to exactly track its defined long-term weekly traffic limits. Any nodes in contact with it will be slowed to match it (if they don't lose patience and timeout). They

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-02 Thread Christopher William Turner
Matthew Toseland wrote: Very nice. Do our overall per second limits still not work? Last I saw they set each connection's limit to 10% of the overall limit, but since we can have many connections, this is unreliable - and also, does whatever there is now work with your changes? Yes. The per

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Christopher William Turner wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: Very nice. Do our overall per second limits still not work? Last I saw they set each connection's limit to 10% of the overall limit, but since we can have many connections, this is

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-01 Thread Mika Hirvonen
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Roman Bednarek wrote: On 26 Jun 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: Roman Bednarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. Recently I was working with the Tomcat Servlet engine, my servlet was generating gifs on the fly. It was able to process about 30-50

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-07-01 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:35:34AM +0200, Roman Bednarek wrote: Maybe such big requests are a serious problem to freenet? I want to add request size logging to my node. Could you advice me where to put the log to catch all incoming and outgoing requests? I have implemented a fix for this,

Re: [freenet-dev] Node performance

2002-06-26 Thread Edgar Friendly
Roman Bednarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. Recently I was working with the Tomcat Servlet engine, my servlet was generating gifs on the fly. It was able to process about 30-50 requests/second on a standard PC ( 500Mhz ). Taking that into account I guess freenet should handle over 100