On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Roman Bednarek wrote: > > > On 26 Jun 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Roman Bednarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Hi. > > > Recently I was working with the Tomcat Servlet engine, my servlet was > > > generating gifs on the fly. It was able to process about 30-50 > > > requests/second on a standard PC ( 500Mhz ). Taking that into account I > > > guess freenet should handle over 100 requests/second, because most > > > requests (when the data is not found) are routed to other hosts. The > > > traffic cannot be that big (I think), so freenet should handle it. > > > > Actually, at the moment requests _are_ that big; between 1 and 2K per > > request. (probably more on the 2K side) It may be that various nodes' > > transfer limits are reducing their capacity to less than what they > > need to be. > > Maybe such big requests are a serious problem to freenet? I want to add > request size logging to my node. Could you advice me where to put the log > to catch all incoming and outgoing requests? > I have read in one post that there is a limit of 60 requests per > minute. It is almost 100 times slower than node could handle in my > estimation.
Yes, but be careful when fiddling with it. I set maximumThreads=0 and tried to adjust node performance with maxConnectionsPerMinute and while NodeStatus showed that the node handled hundreds of requests simultaneously, FProxy performance was sluggish and eventually (after a few hours) it stopped answering FProxy requests completely. A look at the ticker revealed that the node tried to handle every request sent to it, building up a huge queue of requests, but failing to handle any of them within a reasonable time limit. It didn't even have time to poll and aggerate diagnostic data. -- Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
