That sounds great!!
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
nnas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:10
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] A "sneak
peak" ... The microHAM DIGI KEYER:
On 3
Looks like MicroHam is finally taking to first step
to getting it "Right" using an external sound card integrated into the box like
they do at RigExpert to get away from the Computer generated noise and artifacts
of internal sound Cards ...
I like the fact that it claims to use standard
lets get back to talking about new digital modes...
with all the neat things we can do with
them
and not burden the readers around the world with
petty US politics.
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAW
and (c) would take a back seat
toDHSW> emcomms. This would make the current
ARRL petition for bandwidthDHSW> regulation a loser
from the start since its effect on emcomms was
notDHSW> considered or addressed at all in the
petition. The ARRL should haveDHSW> at l
AMATEUR RADIO
GETS FAVORABLE MENTIONS IN FEDERAL KATRINA REPORTSHam radio received
positive mentions in post-Katrina reports from the USHouse of
Representatives and the White House. References to the AmateurRadio
Emergency Service (ARES), the Military Affiliate Radio System (MARS)and the
AMATEUR RADIO
GETS FAVORABLE MENTIONS IN FEDERAL KATRINA REPORTSHam radio received
positive mentions in post-Katrina reports from the USHouse of
Representatives and the White House. References to the AmateurRadio
Emergency Service (ARES), the Military Affiliate Radio System (MARS)and the
Falvio "Particularly.Emergency Communications"
is mentioned in Part 97.1 that you quoted.
But we can argue about the number of angels on the
head of a pin all day long...
Realistically the fact that HAM EMCOMM exists and
has shown by its exemplary service in disaster after disaster
Actually if you look as some of the really old
histories.. even before 1912 when the US Government first issued call signs, you
will find amazing stories of Hams coming to the rescue...so Our Proud EMCOMM
history dates from almost the earliest days of Ham Radio
_
would require abrogating
ourinternational treaty obligations and isn't likely to happen.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S.
White"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> No being training in
Legal interpretations...> > But typically whe
t ARRL
petition for bandwidthregulation a loser from the start since its effect
on emcomms was notconsidered or addressed at all in the petition.
The ARRL should haveat least mentioned emcomms rather than designing the
proposal solelyaround promoting experimentation.
JimWA0LYK---
bands, thus amateurs and their equipment can
be configured and used to support these requirements.
- Original Message -----
From:
Dr. Howard S.
White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:59
PM
Subject: [digital
This announcement should really stir up some new
rantings from the Anti-Everything Forces...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/03/02/5/?nc=1
Have fun!!!
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite:
www.ky
Danny and Mel:
Great work Danny...
and Sorry you have such a jaundiced view of
Volunteerism...Hal
Coming from another country (Canada) and living and
working in many countries around the world, I saw first hand the amazing power
of American Volunteerism compared to having the gove
dio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Dr. Howard S. White Sent: Wednesday, March
01, 2006 1:28 AM To:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Fw:
[digitalradio] The US Ham radio service
Mel:
As one who has lived and worked in your country and enjoyed
the
Mel:
As one who has lived and worked in your country and
enjoyed the gentlemanly civility of UK and European Amateurs I can understand
your attitude. It really was a pleasure using Ham Radio over
there.
I do not know if you ever saw the RSGB video on Ham
Radio...but their entire EMCOM
Tim:
Thank you for yet again for voicing your usual
extremist anti Winlink, anti Bandwidth Regulation, anti ARRL and anti virtually
everything else opinions.
Unfortunately we do not live in the idealized dream
world that you wish it to be...
With EMCOMM, we have to deal with the real
ople in
charge of the EOC function in your county or state. I'm sure they
appreciate you doing that. tim ab0wrOn Saturday 25 February
2006 12:51, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:> Obviously you are not
interested in a simple statement of fact...>> The 2 EOC's were
equipe
Unpunished""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
doc
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 8:48
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: NTS and
traffic handling and digital
w the band/frequency
and that the other EOC had to know that the other
was going to switch to Winlink. Sounds sort of
strange to me. Guess they used ESP?
Joe IveyW4JSI
Age is mind over matterIf you don't mind, it does not
matter
- Original Message -
All other Modes (including several Weak Signal
Digital modes) Failed to Connect the San Diego EOC to the Imperial County EOC
during the SET.
Doc:
You were so hung up in your theoretical analysis
that you missed the point
Basically there was no HF/VHF/UHF propagation path
direct
Gee Doc
Wouldn't it just be a lot easier to have regulation
by bandwidth like most of the rest of the world and not have to be concerned
with regulatory barriers to your net?
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM
Doc:
It's amazing to me how fast the irrational Winlink
Haters crawl out of the woodwork on this reflector
A brief report on the drill is on Page 1 and
Page 2 of the San Diego Section ARES Alert
www.qsl.net/sdgarrl/alert0905.pdf
Most of the rest of the documentation is on the S
Last August San Diego Section ARES ran a
Simulated Emergency Test in San Diego and Imperial County where we simulated the
effects of a 7.9 earthquake next door in Imperial County ( a likely scenario)
which destroyed most of the local infrasture.
Due to the simulated outages of local
infr
s for radio's with
encryption.However, with homeland security being an important issue, they
mayrequire ALL hams to cease using existing equipment on 6m and above
andmove to type accepted equipment. Would this be ok with you since,
asyou say, emcomms is the primary purpose of ham
radio?
Thank You John for putting it so
succinctly
As much as I get sucked in to answering the
Anti-Everything Rants...
Bottom Line...
"the rest of the world has already figured it out
and is patiently waiting for the USA to catch up"
__
Read the 2nd Motion 29 again:
They voted Unanimously to have the the General Counsel, Chief Technology Officer and
Executive Vice President to file a petition"
So they were indeed showing good
judgement!
So Tim:
You are free to continue your ANTI-EVERYTHING
Rantings...
_
EMCOMM has
always been the first reason for existence of HAM
Radio.
Sec. 97.1 Basis and purpose
The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide
an amateur radio service having a fundamental
purpose as expressed in the following principles:
(a) Recognition and
""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:45
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file
Encryption Petition with the FCC
H
Of course, Tim is spreading his usual anti ARRL,
Anti Winlink, Anti Change, Anti Internet and Anti Virtually Everything Else
missinformation rants to make his point.
The reason that the ARRL BOD voted UNANIMOUSLY to
support encryption was due to practical real world experience during the
Thanks for sharing your direct experience from
UK, Canada and Australia.. on your voluntary bandplans..
I have personally also had direct experience with
these plans and found just like you all have found that they work exceedingly
well..
And of course, there is no good reason to think
At our local VEC Meeting we heard that the FCC is
rumored to be eliminating the CW barrier in its entirety in the next week...or
so... effective about July
So there will be an influx of new General "No
Coders'
But do not get your hopes up...
I have been teaching Tech and Gen
Dave:
This is scary... we actually agree...
I even like your wording.. which makes a Heck of a
lot of sense...
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished""Ham
Danny:
When SSB first came out.. it was incredibly
expensive for us Average Hams...who could not afford let alone dream of a
Collins...
But with increased usage.. other manufacturers came
into the market with different less expensive designs ... and the rest of us
could afford to jump
Artie...
You seem to be making my point...
Instead of being an engineer and concentrating on
developing DV technology.. (BTW good luck with your
experiments)
You first have to be a lawyer and attempt to
decipher arcane regulations to see if your experimentation might even be
legal..
Rick
I for one do not love the ARRL plan.. but it is an
improvement over the existing limitation on baud rates and mixing of data, voice
and image...and it is likely the best we are going to be able to get at this
time.
__Howard S.
g it to 'contribute to the advancement of the radio art.' On Feb
3, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
JIm: You
have made a very good case as to why we need to experiment and come up with
new technologies... Instead
of concentrating on all the potential and i
l! It is not evident to me thatthis will be the
case.JimWA0LYK--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr.
Howard S. White"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> The commercial
GSM numbers are not relevant to this discussion ..weare talking about Ham
radio which has different design paramet
d be on the HF bands.
Perhaps the GSM/TDMA channel bandwidths and capacity would be
best.JimWA0LYK--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr.
Howard S. White"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Cingular,
AT&T use GSM which is a form of TDMA for their
CellularSystems.>
Message -----
From:
Dr. Howard S.
White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:28
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL
proposal removes baud rate limitations on HF
Which is why they developed Time Division
Multip
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:35
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
On
Thursday 02 February 2006 01:54, Dr. Howard S. White
wrote:>> an
Graeme
In spite what Tim is wishing for, realistically
people have been shutting down packet nodes here in California due to lack of
traffic and if it were not for the need to keep the digipeaters on the air to
service 2M Winlink for EMCOMM, I suspect that packet would quietly
disappear.
My life experience has been that most people resist
change especially when it comes to new technology and more especially when it
involves a paradigm shift...I was around for the SSB wars and the FM wars and
clearly remember the initial fights with the "old guard" to get them
adopted . Th
Thanks Nino for the idea... That's the kind of
imaginative thinking we need in Ham Radio especially if we remove the regulatory
shackles from innovators...
and I suspect that several spread spectrum QSO's
could share the same bandwidth...
making for much more efficient band utilization
""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:23
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital
voice on HF
On Tuesday 31 January 2006
creaming to
accept any change".You might convince more folks to your way of
thinking if you wouldaddress some of the economic and technical issues
associated withmoving to the "HF Digital Voice" world you espouse.
It would helpexplain WHY folks should spend hard earned mone
erably more complex.I am certain that Hams and associated
business interestsare up to it. We just need the ARRL and FCC to
thinkcarefully before they act and to consult the majorityvs the
minority of Hams *prior* to decision making.73, kd4e> Dr.
Howard S. White wrote:> DV opens up
through, they are
still making it sound like this problem will not
necessarily be corrected. They may still require
analog and digital to be kept in separate areas with bandplans. This really concerns me.
73,
Rick, KV9U
Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> I for one want to start exper
incidents of
non-compliance within their national borders; b) producing regular
reports that summarise the
non-compliances.***************On
Sunday 29 January 2006 02:14, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:> Thank You
Brad for you usu
Have several wide screen HD TV's... Spent
$5,500 for a 51" plasma about 2 years ago.. which I bought online at what was
then a good price... By comparison, the latest one was just spent $949 for a 32"
LCD at Costco which currently sits over my radio station desk and looks really
cool durin
Thank You Brad for you usual clear headed analysis
of the US situation.
It is indeed a very sad statement about some
US hams that they do not trust others to abide by a Gentlemen's agreement and
that they believe that very parochial attitudes must apply to the rest of the
world who share
I for one want to start experimenting with digital
voice technologies on HF... There is a lot of really cool stuff out there
to try that could give us 100% voice copy with S/N in the -db
ranges. It would be really cool to copy voice when my CW friends could no
longer copy code like we no
John ... Like you I have lived and worked in many
countries with voluntary bandplans...
THEY WORK VERY WELL... or I would not be suggesting
them...
But us US Hams love to keep our blinkers on and
ignore the successes in the rest of the world...
We hate to try anything new.. and just
San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 4:50
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RM-11306
Rant
On Thursday 26 January 2006 23:53, Dr. Howard S. White
wrote:> How about the
Except we share those same bands with the rest of
the world and we will have to live with their regulation by bandwidth even if we
do not do it...
So the rest of the world will continue to advance
the art of radio and us US hams will be stuck in the 20th century
__
and, and the RSGB
all introduced documents stating otherwise. How long are you going to keep
your head in the sand along with the ARRL?tim ab0wrOn
Thursday 26 January 2006 20:28, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:> Actually I
have had experience with Regulation by Bandwidth in Canada...>
M-11306
Rant
On Thursday 26 January 2006 00:21, Dr. Howard S. White
wrote:> Lost in the rhetoric against Winlinkis the real reason
for> RM-11305/6.>> There is a third Camp...those of
us who love to experiment [isn't that one> of the reasons for amateur
radio]
7; that many of see happening if this
type ofregulatory scheme is accepted.I wish we were at a sunspot
maximum while these arguments were beingmade. It would give everyone
a better view of what can happen!JimWA0LYK--- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White"<[EMAIL PR
Lost in the rhetoric against Winlinkis the real
reason for RM-11305/6.
There is a third Camp...those of us who love to
experiment [isn't that one of the reasons for amateur radio] who are kept
in technology jail by the current outmoded regulation by mode
US Hams are falling
I have been volunteered into teaching several Tech
Classes for public service agencies so that they can get their
volunteers to become hams. I have been fortunate enough to have been
sent a CD with all the tests, etc
...BUT.
I am wondering if anyone has already developed some
Ama
Bonnie
As usual what you write makes too much
sense...
Be sure to put on your asbestos
suit
Yes ... we need a world wide bandplan.. without any
glacial government regulation...
And most of the world will ultimately go that
way...like Canada and Australia
But the USA is a
: [digitalradio] Re: NOT
RESTRUCTURING. UK bandplan 2006
Operating PSK on 14071.5 is a violation of the current ARRL
HF bandplan. Only RTTY is permitted there.
73, Dave, AA6YQ--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dr. Howard S. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:>&g
to
execute given its poor track record in this area. Is there an alternative
NGO that could take on the mission?
73, Dave, AA6YQ---
In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dr. Howard S. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:>> So you would accept a
rd is both competent from an
allocation perspective and credible from an enforcement
perspective.
73, Dave, AA6YQ--- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:>> The point of the UK RSGB pronouncement is that Region I
has
vailable for digital mode
operation other than RTTY or Packet is 1800 to 1810. Every one of us who
operates PSK anywhere other than 1800 to 1810 is in violation of this
bandplan. 73,
Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dr. Howard S. White" <[
I must agree with Brett... Dave... you just don't
trust your fellow hams as much as Brett, Bonnie and I do...
I have been a ham for almost 48 years and have
lived in and operated from countries all over the world...
I have found Hams to be the most law abiding,
anally rule obeying and c
The point of the UK RSGB pronouncement is that
Region I has Regulation by Bandwidth and NOT MODE.
Bandplans are VOLUNTARY Bandplans established
by the local hams...in this case the RSGB and
NOT BY GOVERNMENT REGULATION...
So when the UK Hams decide that they need to modify
the Volunta
It just does everything well.. it is very
inexpensive.. $50 has all the digital modes and always is adding new ones...
so far at no extra cost.. the user groups give great support...there are always
new Betas coming out with great new features.. and modes...
It has a great CAT interfa
Thank you Dave for your Brilliant Headline:
You have given me a great idea for our antenna fight in San Diego
"Incompetent Politicians Attempting to Destroy Only
Emergency Service That Worked"
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3G
Bob:
You are so incredibly wrong about HF for emergency
services I do not know where to begin...
So simply put.KATRINA Hams on HF Saved
Lives...
The list is incredibly long...
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6
Brad:
Give them a break...
They want the US government looking over their
shoulders all the time...
They want to spend their time counting angels on
the head of a pin rather than experimenting or operating.
They want rules and regulations to cover every
minute permutation and combi
esentative of my
views and neither do a lot of others. If they were to ever separate
QST subscription from ARRL membership their membership would drop even
lower.tim ab0wrOn Tuesday 29 November 2005 13:15,
Dr. Howard S. White wrote:> I absolutely agree with Rick on this
point..
Frankly I have no idea about Region 1 and their
compliance after January 1, 2006..
My experience in Canada is that the Voluntary
Bandplan works extremely well... with compliance well above 99.9% of the
QSO's
From talking to VK's who also have a Voluntary
BandPlan... they tell me
Bill
As I have long said my ideal model is
Canada...where for once the government got it right..
http://www.rac.ca/service/bandplan.htm
Bands are designated by bandwidth.. Amateurs have
developed a Voluntary Bandplan
and for the most part it works very
well
Take a look at Aust
Actually the truth is exactly opposite of what you are saying...
They have a Regulation by Bandwidth and a Voluntary
BandPlan
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpu
Reality Check:
If the Public as serviced by Government Agencies
and Non Government Agencies providing Emergency Services are not our "Customers"
in an Emergency...
then who are our "Customers"?
How could do you suggest we service the Public if
we do not provide the service needed by
The ARRL is The National Organization.. if you do
not like it.. join and get elected as a Director and have your say in
policy...
How could a "Constitutional Convention" possibly
come together in one place to represent the 675,000 US Amateurs?
Such a convention would be physically
imp
I absolutely agree with Rick on this point.. the
ARRL may not be perfect.. but it is our only national Elected
body...
If you do not like their stance on an issue..
become a member... get involved and run for an elected position...
and change their position...
___
res, but the end result seems to be just allowing Hellschreiber and
analog SSTV.[1] <http://www.nvbb.net/~jaffejim/n5rfx%20info.htm>[2]
<http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi>Leigh
/ WA5ZNUOn Mon, 28 Nov 2005 1:13 pm, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:>
For example the
d""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 2:08
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
Bandwidth
On Monday 28 November 2
The point being that why do we even need to think
about whether a mode is legal or not...
For example the combination of image and data in
MFSK is illegal in the USA...
If we had bandwidth only regulation, then all modes
and combinations thereof would be legal as long as they fit within
of the driver, but of others on the road;
passengers, pedestrians etc. Radio rules are not only for the one user,
but for everyone else on the bands as well. Reduce the rules, and you
have the pigs ruling the roost, to mix metaphors.
----- Original Message -
Fr
Mark:
Very perceptive of you... in the long run, the FCC
has a lot of better things to do than spend their limited resources
continuing the excessive regulation of the Ham Bands... Removing the Telegraphy
licensing barrier and reducing excessive Ham Regulation will go a long way to
reduc
Mark:
The point is that the Region 1 Plan is a Voluntary
Bandplan...
Not fixed in stone with difficult to change
government regulation!
Regulation is by bandwidth... NOT
Mode...
Which is what the ARRL is attempting to do in a
limited way...
__
Mark:
Thanks for your very lucid summary...
My vote is for the Canadian Model where we set
the maximum bandwidth for each band.
I might note that much of the rest of the world is
going to this style model...
Even if the ARRL adopts the more restrictive ARRL
model ... I predict t
Kevin:
We in the USA live in possibly the most
restrictive regulatory regime in the World
People like Bonnie have aptly named it "Technology
Jail"
For Example:
To develop a new Digital Communications
Mechanism... one has to go through all sorts of regulatory hoops.. such as
p
Thank you Brad for again so eloquently making my
point...
As you know we in the USA are very provincial in
that we believe that entire planet revolves around us...
People like Dave still think that if the FCC
regulates something those rules that must also apply to the whole
planet...
Thank you Brad for so elequently making my
point...
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
-
essage -
From:
Dave
Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 2:08
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re:
Bandwidth-Based FCC Rules for USA
>>>AA6YQ comments below--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dr. Howard S. White" &
Having worked from countries with and without
Bandwidth Restrictions.. I speak from the benefit of operating inside out
outside of technologying jail...
Simply put.. our US bandwidth by mode restrictions
no longer make sense in the 21st Century...
and have gone a long way to keeping
Winlink Development Team is currently beta
testing SCAMP
which is a Free sound card based ARQ HF mode
for Email
that works under Windows and does not require the
use of an expensive modem or a TNC.
You can download a beta version
at:
ftp://www.winlink.org/help/SCAMP/
and you c
A Couple of Comments:
1. My 6 SSB Channels
equivalency assumed equal distribution of traffic over the 24 hours of the
day... in the real world, traffic tends to cluster around the hours when people
are awake so more peak bandwidth is needed.
2. Your encouragement of the
transist
printing. I haven't decided
whether it will be FNpack compatible; I'd like it to be.On
2005-04-12 23:39, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:>
Buddy:>>>
The 2003 San Diego Cedar Fires ...>The K3UK
DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
her VHF bands yes, but digital,
no.
Buddy WB4M
All outgoing emails scanned with Norton's Anti-virus.
- Original Message -
From:
Dr. Howard S.
White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:39
AM
Buddy:
See my post on the San Diego 2003 Cedar Fires...18
months ago..
Hams definitely saved the day
How about 9/11...
Hams were there as communicators when all the other
systems failed..
The list is updated daily
__
Buddy:
You don't have to go so far as India... How about
something closer to home... like San Diego
The 2003 San
Diego Cedar Fires
Most people are unaware that during the
recent 2003 Cedar Fires which so devastated San Diego that Land Lines Telephones
failed due to dow
Buy a RigExpert.. It has a built in sound card and
works much better than the internal sound cards
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LA"No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished"Formerly "Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochis
ount the QRM it causes
to others. SCAMP might be slower than Pactor, but it is fast enough to
do the job, and eliminates the QRM.
73, Dave, AA6YQ--- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:> Dave:> > You are getting
choose a
protocol that QRMs ongoing QSOs over one that is slower but doesn't QRM
ongoing QSOs?
73, Dave, AA6YQ---
In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dr. Howard S. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:> Dave:> > In my dreams the answer is
yes.
Dave:
In my dreams the answer is
yes.
Rick who is writing the SCAMP code says that Pactor
3 is very good...and would be hard to beat...
I, personally, would love it if SCAMP
could replace PACTOR
... but unfortunately, the real world creeps into
my dreams..
we just have
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
