there.
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption NOT!
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:15:48 -
Thanks for your frank discussion
joined the ARRL, so there (HI).
73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: N6CRR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption NOT!
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:57:32 -
Encryption should not be with the sole intent to obscure the content
from other hams, but it should be availble to hams when there is a
need to shield sensitive data and information from evil-doers
And just who decides who the evil-doers are and what constitutes
sensitive data? -- Jeff/wb0m
Danny,
Very good points all. I had not thought about this in a situation
like Katrina. Can you imagine the ARC, Salvation Army, each local
EOC, and the state EOC all having different encryption keys? If
hundreds of hams show up to a disaster like this, who is going to
administer all the
] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:17:20 -0700
expeditionradio writes:
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
Can see no valid reason for encryption on our frequencies. If one
could provide an single example I would be interested..
Hi Bill,
Hams should
Pay attention Rod, you get it eventuallyit's called RADIO! (HI)
Original Message Follows
From: Rodney Kraft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:54:48 -0400
NO encrhyption on ham bands please. I certainly understand encryption of
messages for the emergency traffic, but then that traffic should not be sent
on the regular ham bands. It would be quite
-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have
encryption
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
You forgot one
To hide the fact the message is illeagal
encryption in my opinion is not needed on ham radio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Cans of worms all over the place, Kurt. Get used to it.
It will only be getting worse. Adapt or perish.
Original Message Follows
From
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, wa8vbx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I guess I will fight not to have encryption on ham radio but
wait isn't that what SCS/Winlink folks already have. Adapt or give in,
mmmhh, I guess I will not do neither but to continue to fight the
commericalization of ham
Kurt,
It is already here! We have been encrypting Amateur Radio Part 97 digital
traffic 24/7 on 2.4 GHz for years! It is expanding in use in the Amateur
Radio VHF UHF bands, but is not likely to be found on any HF bands as
international encrypted traffic is not permitted by the ITUbut
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
I dont have a problem with MICROWAVE . NOR realy
on 75 meters however how do you control who gets on
and uses the band . how many unlicensed persons on
75 / 80 meters would
John,
You might want to try PocketDigi for Windows or Windows Pocket PC. It
does a great job on CW over 25WPM and is free.
73,
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 3:53 pm, John Champa wrote:
So there should NOT be any problemof course, CW above 25 WPM might
as
well be encrypted as far as I
John Champa wrote:
So encryption is required to be used, and the League attorney
asked the FCC if that was acceptable and they said yes. The
FCC's reasoning was that it was NOT our INTENT (an important
legal concept) to obscure the communications. Our intent is
to PROTECT our HSMM Network
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
If one does a web search you find a lot of comments about encryption and
amateur radio. But they mostly seem to come from one source. You and
your group. Just because you are doing something that may be illegal or
at least very borderline sub rosa type of activity does not mean that
the rest
: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption... NOT
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:35:55 -0500
If one does a web search you find a lot of comments about encryption and
amateur radio. But they mostly seem to come from one source. You and
your group. Just because you are doing something that may
buy that argument
(HI).
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: n2qz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:25:47 -0400
John Champa wrote:
So
18 matches
Mail list logo
