HI Allis there any operator on this group who uses Linux as their
O/S and who is running WSJT HF or otherwisei have a problem that i
need some help withits working and i can make contacts but in the
terminal it says that it cant find the KV decoder and is using the BM
algorithm...i use
Hi John,
It is sad to inform you that the Norwegian HAM's are not allow to use the ALE
mode (sounding, arq mode..) on 30m.
We have only 1khz in bandwidth. It's a pity , because I like this contest free
band. See you on 20m.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
- Original Message -
From: John
Peter Frenning wrote:
I have and do David, and have no such problem. Using Linux Mint
6.10(Cassandra) (a Ubuntu derivative) and the standard distribution of
WSJT 5.9.6 r309 dated: 2006-09-23 02:39:03 running on an HP omnibook
x6200 (1.6GHz/1GB RAM)
all running normally apart from a
Bill Aycock wrote:
Frank- I think that there is MUCH confusion in our ranks on this
subject. For instance, I set my rig to one frequency (usually
14,070.00) and leave it there. I tune to different signals by moving
the marker that shows the offset from the base frequency on the
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the band conditions start to improve, with more signals on the band
(remember, we are presently right at the solar minimum) using the narrow
filters on digital modes will become more and more important.
It will be
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Brian A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong. However, reading all these posts suggests
that what these wonder modes want and or need is channelized,
clear channel frequencies,
For all you old timers
The 50th anniversary of Sputnik is coming up on October 6, 2007. There
are a lot of posts on the web and blogs, one web site being:
www.arrl.org about Sputnik.
Copied Sputnik on my Hallcafters S-38 E just before I went to radio
school at Keesler AFB. At Keesler they had a
Hi Roger.
That was good info. Sounds like it wasn't and couldn't be automatic
operation. Operator intervention really needed.
It is too bad they didn't try holding the ALE tests this weekend on
20M. It would have been instructive to know just how well that mode
managed in combat conditions.
Roger- thanks for an excellent set of comments. With my rig (FT-920),
my best filtering is in the audio, which limits me. I do have a
narrower (INRAD) filter than the stock one and that helps. I can
dream about a tuneable RF filter, though, can't I?
Thanks- Bill-W4BSG
At 05:37 AM 10/1/2007,
Hi Robert
Sorry about delay - lost some mail due change of server
had to go to digitalradio group to find this email of yours
Will see if I can do this - may take a few days
Regards
Les
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you repeat the test with
Hmm unattended soundings?
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Tests in ARQ FAE
I just got off the air on 30 meters
I was all of 6 years old. My only memory was of walking in the streets
with familiy members and the adults talking about Sputnik and looking up
towards the sky.
On 10/1/07, Jerry W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all you old timers
The 50th anniversary of Sputnik is coming up on October 6,
After the contact, I switched over to ALE 141A and listened for quite
some time in unproto mode. Later on I heard an eastern station calling
the HFN, which must be the HFLink Network. This can not be an automatic
station as it was outside the automatic subband. I am not suggesting
that it was
PC-ALE , and I assume Multipsk ALE, is designed to work in attended mode for
almost all applications other than two likely scenarios.
1. Soundings: This now referred to as station ID by the HFLINK web site
(http://hflink.net/qso/). I think this is a fair description, since it
simply sends the
I received a private email from a Pactor user that has experienced
what they think is deliberate QRM. This ham assumes that digital mode
operators that dislike PACTOR mailboxes are thinking that all PACTOR
signals are unattended mailboxes and then QRMing them. . They asked
me to point out that
So which is better, park the dial and move the audio
center frequency (ACF) ldquo;markerrdquo;, or park the marker and move
the frequency dial? The former seems to be the standard method used for
PSK31 (when using programs like Digipan and PSK31), but the latter seems
to make more sense in the
I'm on 14.109.5 running MultiPsk 141A ALE Mode here at 0220 UTC
10/02/2007 will be on this freq till who knows when.
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 06:29 PM
To:
Andy has some very good points,
If you are a human operator and listen on the frequency for a period of
time, ideally at least a few minutes if you do not use QRL or a voice
equivalent, and do not hear any other activity, you may be fairly safe
in assuming the frequency is not in use. It is
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
However, what is the REAL difference between sending your callsign a
few times via ALE , versus picking up the Mic and asking is this
frequency in use ?
There are two such differences:
Whether you find an interesting signal by clicking on traces in a
panoramic tuning display or by rotating your tranceiver's tuning
dial, ideally you should then direct your digital mode application to
place the selected signal at a pre-specified optimal audio offset by
appropriately QSYing
Dave Bernstein wrote:
Whether you find an interesting signal by clicking on traces in a
panoramic tuning display or by rotating your tranceiver's tuning
dial, ideally you should then direct your digital mode application to
place the selected signal at a pre-specified optimal audio offset
Andy K3UK wrote:
However, what is the REAL difference between sending
your callsign a few times via ALE , versus picking up
the Mic and asking is this frequency in use ?
Hi Andy,
I agree Andy, a normal ALE sounding or linking burst is only 10 to 20
seconds duration, and consists of
I believe that your analysis of part 97 is correct.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has some very good points,
If you are a human operator and listen on the frequency for a
period of
time, ideally at least a few minutes if
Andy K3UK wrote:
As Bonnie mentioned last week, ALE has no busy detect for
none ALE signals. So yes, Soundings and certain other
aspects of ALE cause QRM.
Hi Andy,
A few weeks ago, during the discussion about busy detectors, I
described some of the different busy detect systems that are
A couple of minor comments:
97.3(a)(9)/ Beacon/. An amateur station transmitting communications for
the purposes of observation of propagation and reception or other
related experimental activities.
ALE as is normally used, is actually operated as a selective calling
and linking interface.
To answer the question, one must define communication =)
If the definition is merely pass information quickly and reliably,
it certainly is possible.
If the definition is transfer messages and files unchanged, in a
manner equivalent the high bandwidth communication infrastructure, and
without
So your idea of good intentions, tolerance, and friendship is The
automatic band segments are a stupid place to park a slow keyboarding
digi mode... like they say, If you can't stand the heat, stay out of
the kitchen. :)
Do you have a receipt for those frequencies you seem to think you own?
It would seem that automatic is a word that provokes un-helpful
discussion. Since no meaningful discussion can be held without shared terms
and meanings, maybe we could consider the following definitions rather than
using the nebulous and diverse automatic:
Unattended: Cases where there is no
28 matches
Mail list logo
