AGAIN .
NO AGENCY USES 6 METERS here in Florida I have been
active in New York since the mid 60's and from Tampa
bay since 1973 and there has never been any emergency
nets on this band only local ones from 52 - 53 MHz.
All emergency nets are done on 2 and up. 2 meters is
not dead either
If you have a windows XP machine with 512 MB RAM you may want to try
the windows version of the pskmail client. The puppy Linux image runs
inside windows and is just 256 MB, so it runs entirely in RAM.
As it uses QEMU not every soundcard is supported, only the VESA server works.
But you don't
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Licensing of Pactor modes
snip
Actually, the only outfit they licensed it to was one American company
the name of which escapes me.
It was Pac-Com. - I had one of those early units.
- Original Message -
From: Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FCC: Petition to Kill Digital Advancement
I probably should not get involved but here's a classic example of why
Hi Rein
I have been using VirtualBox ( http://www.virtualbox.org/ ), it seems to
be faster than QEMU on my machine.But is it possible to port this to
windows? It is to much hassle switching between Linux and windows. Like
it or not , but windows is the most used operating system among HAMs to
Charles Brabham wrote:
- Original Message - From: Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:barrister54%40socal.rr.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Licensing of Pactor modes
snip Actually, the only outfit they licensed it to was one
American company the name of which
Hi Rein,
Thanks for a straight answer.
As you probably know , I am no Linux hater. I am running several Linux
system my self ; PClinuxOS ( http://www.pclinuxos.com/ ) on my small
DELL400 laptop, this is really a great distro of Linux, and ClarkConnect
( http://www.clarkconnect.com/ ) as a
One slight scoring change in the rules to eliminate a multiply by zero
issue (see below), everything else is as first published.A few
things to keep in mind...
Remember this is a contest for 11 hours, no required rest time. It is
ONLY 2 bands, 40M and 20M. You can work both bands, or just
I believe you are saying do more with less. In other words, faster
speeds with less bandwidth, a laudable goal. Am I correct?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rud Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of the need for speed is technical innovation, part of the
ARS. The
current
This is one of the problems with the so-called band-plans. Europe has one,
NA has another, etc. Until such time as there is an Iternational Band
Plan, they are all rather useless, and sets us up to interfere with each
other. It sort of reminds me of what JA1RL told me back in the 70 at a
It sounds like we're in agreement. There is space for wider emissions on the
VHF bands. 50.7 Hz is unsed here and designated for experimental use in the
band plan. I participated in SSB nets and contests on 50, 144, 222, 432 and
1296 MHz when I lived in southern California and large portions of
Modern filters that have been used in real equipment since the 80s can
be -1 db at 3100 and down 25 db at 3.5 k with negligible overshoot and
ripple in the 10ths of a DB. Chebyshev filters are not really the filter
of choice for this, elliptic tilers with some custom tweaks are a better
Hello Demetre and all,
writers who although they allow everyone to use their program, they
keep their code to themselves. Of course it is everyone's right to
protect their code and I do not blame anyone here, I am just stating a
fact.
As I belong to this category (Multipsk author), here is
What is the likelihood of getting PSKmail interfaced to a hardware modem like
the KAM+ ? That sure would come in handy at VHF (for Packet).
73,
Howard K5HB
- Original Message
From: Rein Couperus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 4:25:22
Digital Radio Century Club JT65A New Years Crawl
Date: Monday December 31, 2007
Time: 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm
Location: JT65A ONLY on 20M or 40M ONLY (suggested frequencies - 14074.077
7035.40)
Notes: Announcing the Digital Radio Century Club New Years Crawl
Date : January 1 2008
Time : Z
The ARRL is publishing designs for simple phasing SSB exciters with 3-pole
filters and filter-type exciters with 4-pole crystal filters so we can't count
on DSP. Phasing transmitter kits have filters with at least 5-poles so they are
somewhat better. These should be able to acheive 23 dB
I had an FAE 400 QSO (barely) with a station on 20 meters earlier today.
We did eventually lose the link, but there were times that we got some
reasonable throughput. I increased power to about 50 watts and was able
to get through to his end fairly well for much of the time (about 40
wpm). I
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Hello Howard,
I use Pactor I every now and then for keyboard to keyboard. It is
I prefer live chat via Pactor-I ..
The problem is the decline in general usage by
most radio amateurs who prefer to not purchase a
a TNC for this mode, and instead use soundcard
modes ..
Jus sayin
Elaine
--
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons
WA6UBE / AAR9JA
http://www.qrz.com/wa6ube
w6ids wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bill McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:bmc%40wonderwave.net To:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 30,
2007 12:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD
For KBD
20 matches
Mail list logo
