Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW development, for example adding
Patrick's RSID or CALL-ID features? I get asked this myself and can't answer
as I'm not on any MixW mailing lists.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw improvement is
on the logging aspect.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Simon (HB9DRV)simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW
I have the source code to MMTTY, have updated MMTTY to enable operation
under Vista (version 1.66G), and intend to improve its RTTY decoding
capability.
MMTTY can transmit via AFSK or FSK; as far as I know, MMVARI is limited to
AFSK.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From:
Hi,
It's good to hear Nick is better - long time no news.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Andy obrien wrote:
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved,
Waaaooowww
Is incredible, just go to Device Manager uninstall the COM1, scan all new
device plug and play. Increase the speed to 57600 in COM1.
Try again, the program.
Thank all people for the tips to help me.
73' Wilfredo Junior Aviles / KP4ARN
Amateur Radio is the best way to know
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all members of Texas Army MARS and Region 6, are using
MixW. idly
Hi Dave,
Alex, VE3NEA has an interesting page about MMTTY performance here:
http://www.dxatlas.com/RttyCompare/
I completely agree with his results regarding the performance of TruTTY
and has been my preferred RTTY program for while now.
73 Sholto
K7TMG
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
I have the
Thanks, Sholto, I'm aware of the results Alex has published and the tools he
makes available. There are significant opportunities for improvement.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, chas ch...@... wrote:
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all
MixW has (I think) support for the data modes used by satellites - that's
one thing I would like to support.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
What am I missing?
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
No, let's get back to Rick's question and ask what it is about
MixW that you find to be superior to everything else out there.
I downloaded a trial version of MixW long ago and wasn't impressed
enough to want to go further with it. What am I missing?
I can't speak for
chas,
What are the MARS operators using MixW for? Are there modes that are not
available on other programs that they find compelling?
I downloaded MixW again today, but it looks about the same as it did in
past years. It is a fairly clean interface (albeit, that is a subjective
thing for an
I think MARS uses MixW mostly for MT63. Here in South Carolina, in Navy
MARS, we are standardizing on using fldigi for MT63, and before that
some people used MixW and some used Nino's program. It all boils down to
whicher user interface is easier to use, or to train people to use. If
everyone
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD, a lot of logging programs won't. I
just click on a callsign and the logging info fills right
It is all about the visual simplicity of its interface . . . elegant in its
minimalism. And I say that truly as a complement. Although I like HRD and
MultiPSK both for other reasons, MixW is easier to use. More pleasing to the
eyes especially versus MultiPSK.
Rick - KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
Hello Buddy,
UGLY looking program. I don't even like to look at it. HRD is nice, but
I
PSE, say that you don't like the interface and ignore this program. No need
to be excessive.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: F.R. Ashley gda...@clearwire.net
To:
I think that as a digital mode application, MixW is good , but it
has lagged seriously behind other applications in the past 2-3 years.
The DX cluster operations are no-where near as good as Winwarbler
affords via the Spotcollector interface, or the opportunities DM780
has provides via HRD's
Buddy and Rick,
What you are describing seems to be flidigi more than any other program.
Have you tried this program? And unlike Windows-only programs, fldigi
works on more platforms than any other program of its type. Maybe the
RAC CD won't work on fldigi though.
Fldigi is ultra clean and
Not quite true...MultiPSK does have the KISS option, but it has a glitch in it
so that it passes unacceptable information back to the BBS at the ending of a
message. Patrick will no doubt get around to fixing this but there is little
demand for it as compared to other mods he is making to the
All,
QRV ALE-400 ARQ chat mode -- 14074.0 USB +/- QRM
Tony -K2MO
All,
Multipsk / ALE-400 ARQ QSO Basics...
Connecting:
1. Switch to ALE-400 mode in the main window.
2. Click ARQ FAE button
3. Click AUX FUNCTIONS - Aux Functions window will appear.
4. Enter the stations call sign in the SELECTIVE CALL ARQ FAE box.
5. Click the CALL button.
Answering:
1.
All,
Multipsk / ALE-400 ARQ QSO Basics...
Connecting:
1. Switch to ALE-400 mode in the main window.
2. Click ARQ FAE button
3. Click AUX FUNCTIONS - Aux Functions window will appear.
4. Enter the stations call sign in the SELECTIVE CALL ARQ FAE box.
5. Click the CALL button.
Answering:
1.
I received an email today lamenting the use of high power on PSK31, I
have to agree that high powered signals all cramped in to a small
segment of the band is quite frustrating. I was wondering about
starting a PSK31 calling frequency on 20, 30, and 40. How about VFO
14073 plus 1000 hz for 20M ?
24 matches
Mail list logo
