There are still bandwidth restrictions in the VHF and UHF bands.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 23:14 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
But content has nothing to do
I must be one of the stupid folks that have a misconception about
what the withdrawn petition was to accomplish.
Could you enlighten us on just exactly what modes are being blocked
by the current regulations. What bands do these modes operate on?
What is the purpose of the blocked modes?
The
-
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 15:18 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
I must be one of the stupid folks that have a misconception about
what the withdrawn petition was to accomplish.
Could you enlighten us on just
Could you enlighten us on just exactly what modes are being blocked
by the current regulations. What bands do these modes operate on?
What is the purpose of the blocked modes?
That's a big part of the problem with the previous proposal. It
created new blocks we don't have today.
The
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2007 10:30:10 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
One problem is that very wide modems are
allowed only outside the phone/image segments, which is the opposite of what is
reasoable for users. Another example is that data
The petition was primarily intended to restrict modes based upon
bandwidth. Looking at this from an HF perspective, I used to think this
was a good compromise to take, and even thought of myself as being
progressive for supporting this approach. After listening to those
who have experienced
I know there is a group of you who do not like discussions of digital
issues of these types (..) .
Well , let me quote John VE5MU : We've heard all this before . This
extreme ARRL/FCC focus
has insignificant interest outside US. What will happen if Norwegian
hams start spaming this group with
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
John, please tell us what modes need more than 100 kHz
bandwidth, or even which mode needs the 100 kHz.
Personally, I have not experienced these but would like
to hear about them.
Howard K5HB
- Original Message
From: John
Can you give me a regulation that restricts very wide modems within
the phone/image segments. If you are talking about using data in the
phone/image segment, I'll agree but I don't see a paragraph that
limits bandwidth within the phone/image segment.
I will agree that wider bandwidths could be
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 16:33 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
John, please tell us what modes need more than 100 kHz
bandwidth, or even which mode needs the 100 kHz.
Personally, I have not experienced
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 20:56 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
Can you give me a regulation that restricts very wide modems within
the phone/image segments. If you are talking about using data in the
phone/image segment
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, let's stop beefing and GET ON THE AIR!
John - K8OCL
Right! Let's get on the air. See you on RFS2400.
Bonnie KQ6XA
12 matches
Mail list logo
