I didn't want to be the one to point that out in case I was missing out
on something stupid. :o)
Chris
Alex Ezell wrote:
Might we have a link?
/alex
On 3/28/07, *Andy Matthews* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay...
I finished my proof of concept
Hi folks,
Rick, and I are working on this problem, and we're having trouble with
the following generated taconite code:
taconite
replaceContent select=#Result_Years
/replaceContent
attr select=#Years_Status name=Years_StatusID value=True
replaceContent
Ah ha! We'll see if that works... I'm by no means an XML guru... thanks
for the tip. I'll let you know if it works.
Chris
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Hi folks,
Rick, and I are working on this problem, and we're having trouble with
the following generated taconite code
lol! ;o)
Mike, I'm assuming that code like this would work:
taconite
replacecontent
blah...
/replacecontent
replacecontent
blah, blah
/replacecontent
replacecontent
blah, blah, blah
/replacecontent
/taconite
: 615.467.6249
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dealerskins.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christopher Jordan
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:46 AM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: Re: [jQuery] n related select boxes
What do you mean by n
That wouldn't work for compressed JS would it?
Chris
Brian Cherne wrote:
The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I didn't even
think to look for JSDoc... but it's essentially the same. I haven't
needed to extract the Javadoc code into a MSWord document, but I think
such
Mike,
I'm working on this problem with Rick, and I've never used taconite before.
The idea is that we've got three hidden form fields on the calling page
which are associated with each text field being verified. All fields are
being verified onblur by the processing page called via ajax.
, that it wouldn't work.
I'm probably dead wrong, and should have just lurked this conversation,
huh? ;o)
Chris
Kenneth wrote:
It should as long as the compressor removes comments.
On 3/26/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That wouldn't work
and not
modified or read, the documentation would be stripped, and therefore
running any tool to gather such information would return nothing I (or
very little).
And that's if *my understanding is correct :P Sorry if I confused you!
On 3/26/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto
Nice piece of hackery, Daemach! Thanks for the jQuery port of Shawn's
excellent tool! :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Daemach wrote:
I wrote the jquery plugin and fixed a few bugs but credit for the
original dump() goes to Shawn at Netgrow.
On Mar 22, 10:50 am, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's been around, but it's always good to see that more and more people
are turned on to it. The jQuery plug-in version is *much* better at
dumping DOM elements than the other version (unless he updated that
version as well). It will now show all expando type attributes if I'm
not mistaken.
I
What is this base2 deal? I ran the test, but wanted to read more about
it. I went to http://homepages.nildram.co.uk to see if I could find out
more, but couldn't. I did a google for 'base2 javascript' but of course
it just comes up with stuff about binary and such.
John. I'd like to hear what
be sure to post an update once I've tested these changes further.
--John
On 3/22/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is this base2 deal? I ran the test, but wanted to read more about
it. I went to http://homepages.nildram.co.uk to see if I could find out
more, but couldn't
, though. :o)
I'll check out the SVN now. :o)
Chris
Mike Alsup wrote:
Chris, I just had that bug happen again this morning but this time I
*think* that I've really fixed it! SVN has been updated.
Mike
On 3/20/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure Mike! Thanks and I'm sorry I
John,
My opinion's not worth much, but I think it's the right decision. I for
one would rather you be doing something creative and innovative instead
of babysitting the day-to-day maintenance of the mailing list.
Good on ya,
Chris
John Resig wrote:
Hi Everyone -
As you've probably
this. If you're able to duplicate the
problem could you test it with the latest rev (1.02)?
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/blockUI/jquery.block.js?format=txt
Thanks.
Mike
On 3/19/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try and put something together that can
I looked at this and didn't see any examples of drop down menus or
sub-menus. I don't have a lot of use for a menu system that doesn't have
this sort of capability. Did I miss the sample that showed this or is it
lacking it?
Chris
Kenneth wrote:
Both are very nice, and I'm really considering
By 'crushes' do you mean that you get a javascript error stating that
some element can't do something because it is hidden or missing (... I
know, my memory is great... sorry)... did you get something like that?
Chris
Seb Duggan wrote:
Wow - that's a lot of scripts!
I had the same problem.
if it doesn't.
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/blockUI/jquery.block.js?format=txt
On 3/19/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By 'crushes' do you mean that you get a javascript error stating that
some element can't do something because it is hidden or missing (... I
Take a look at jdMenu. It may work for you.
Chris
Brad Perkins wrote:
I've searched the Nabble archive and looked at some of the plugin
listings but haven't found what I'm looking for.
Is there a JQuery implementation of a hierchical dropdown menu? I'm
looking for something that could
I'll try and put something together that can be publicly accessible.
Thanks,
Chris
Mike Alsup wrote:
I think we're dealing with two very different errors. Do you have a
url that exhibits the focus problem, that would be a big help.
Mike
On 3/19/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED
)
Cheers!
Chris
Daemach wrote:
Please add:
StructKeyExists: function(s,k){
for(var n in s){
if (n == k) return true;
}
return false;
},
Shall we post additions and updates here?
Christopher Jordan wrote
Hi folks!
Well, I've updated the plug-in to include the following new functions:
StructKeyExists,
ListRest,
DateFormat,
TimeFormat
Here are the valid date and time format masks:
* = Long month (eg. January)
* mmm = Short month (eg. Jan)
* mm = Numeric date (eg. 07)
*
of the new functions Chris just added. There is also a
search box above that left column to save you from digging ;)
Hmm - sure would be nice to get the jQuery API up here...
On 3/17/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks!
Well, I've
I got this post just fine! :o)
Chris
Daemach2 wrote:
Disregard, please. I'm having some posting/account issues ;)
--
http://cjordan.info
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Daemach... that's pretty sweet! :o)
Chris
Daemach wrote:
You can look here for a live demo until I can get something better on my
blog:
http://beta.missionincrease.org/jQuery/autosave_example.cfm
matt2012 wrote:
this looks great a few working examples would really be appreciated
Matt.
This is a government project. Late and over budget is their middle
name. What sort of garbage is the security reasons excuse. It sounds
like someone is making decisions who doesn't know what the h*** they're
talking about. Give me a freakin' break! That's like some clients who
don't want to
There was a web developer that my client hired to do some graphic
design stuff really, and she tried to convince them that javaScript was
evil. I think folks who do that sort of thing are just afraid of
something they don't understand. Or they think it's too hard, so they
try to convince all
Hi folks,
I've tried to use the filter function in the past, but have never been
successful. Usually, I just figure out another better way to do what I
wanted (meaning that filter was probably the wrong choice to begin
with), but now I've got a case where I think filter would work fine, but
with a selector, but a function should work. Can you
not do the following instead tho?
$(radio:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + id + ])
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Hi folks,
I've tried to use the filter function in the past, but have never been
successful. Usually, I just figure out another better way
+ ])
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Hi folks,
I've tried to use the filter function in the past, but have never been
successful. Usually, I just figure out another better way to do what I
wanted (meaning that filter was probably the wrong choice to begin
with), but now I've got a case where I think filter
(:radio:checked) (UNTESTED!), this
being the select and with the caveat that each select/radio set should be
descendants of another tag such as a div or td to avoid grabbing all of the
radio buttons...
Christopher Jordan wrote:
The IDs are differnent. That selector I'm using says find me a radio
Daemach wrote:
A great way to do testing with your own page is to do the selectors right in
the firebug console. If it returns an array of elements you can mouse over
them and FF will highlight the element in the dom so you can verify that it
got the right one. An empty array means it didn't
) (UNTESTED!), this
being the select and with the caveat that each select/radio set should be
descendants of another tag such as a div or td to avoid grabbing all of the
radio buttons...
Christopher Jordan wrote:
The IDs are differnent. That selector I'm using says find me a radio
button that has
. An empty array means it didn't match anything.
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Doh! I meant $(radio:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + id + ]) oops.
But, I'm still not sure that 'radio:checked' works. I think I have to
use input:checked. I thought about the siblings thing too, but I wasn't
sure of the exact
Hey guys,
I'm kinda in crisis mode at work right now, but I've got a response in
the works for how to use the functions with jQuery. I'll be posting it
as soon as I can.
Cheers,
Chris
Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL
Daemach,
Why don't you just make a nice debug plug-in, that you can include at
the top of your code to give you the functions you need, then when
you're done you just remove the one script src=... line?
That's not a half bad idea. Anyone up for doing something like that?
Chris
Daemach
to switch to safari or opera (not bloody
likely) I'll add a
function that tests for the availability of a console. Until
then this
works for me.
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Daemach,
Why don't you just make a nice debug plug-in, that you can
include at
the top of your code
Hi fellow jQuerians!
I've just published a new plug-in that adds 42 handy ColdFusion
functions to the jQuery object. The methods are designed to behave like
their ColdFusion counterparts.
Here's the list:
Abs(number)
ArrayAppend(array, value)
ArrayLen(array)
ArraySort(array, sort_type [,
an interesting effect where in
when each time I hover over a menu item the width of the menu grows.
it's very strange.
Let me know if you need an example of that to see it in action.
Thanks heaps!
Chris
Cheers,
-Jonathan
On 3/8/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ashutosh that is sweet! very nice. I like the demo.
Chris
ashutosh bijoor wrote:
Hi
http://www.reach1to1.com/sandbox/jquery/jqchart/
Been working on this for a while now, and finally have a first cut
version up and running.
Only tested in Firefox 2.0
Would appreciate feedback.
Regards
My example uses 1.2.1 right now. Does that matter, or should I do the
upgrade before put out any example code?
Chris
Jonathan Sharp wrote:
Trimming message...
On 3/9/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will indeed upgrade to the beta (any idea
, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My example uses 1.2.1 right now. Does that matter, or should I do
the upgrade before put out any example code?
Chris
Jonathan Sharp wrote:
Trimming message...
On 3/9/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED
Have you posted this on the developer list? That's probably a really
good place for this post.
Cheers,
Chris
manfred berry wrote:
Hi
I wonder why jquery is using the : as seperator for custom selectors as this
is just another character which can be used in any element id.
In other words
I've resorted to writing my own calendar functions (a mix of JS and
ColdFusion) because I needed more than just a date picker. I'll watch
this thread too, and see where it goes. :o)
Chris
Eugene Louw wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I'm looking for exactly looking for the same thing, I would like to be
Jonathan,
First of all, thanks so much for the great plug-in! I'm using it in my
latest project, and it's really made an impression on my client, and
what they think about my work. So thanks for the boost, there buddy! :o)
Secondly, I'm using the 1.2.1 version, but there's a behavior I don't
Rick,
You could use Ajax, but it might be simpler to use JavaScript
validation. The jQuery validation plugin that Daemach pointed you to
would be an example of that. I wrote a validation plug-in myself that I
use for a client, and it works pretty well. I think the other plug-in is
maybe more
in your example - more
elegant than hardcoding for sure ;)
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Daemach,
I suppose it's just for the sake of education or something, but putting
the return value in a structure and passing it back seems like overkill
to me. Since there can be only one result from
wrote:
BTW, since you don't need a deep copy of the arguments structure in the cfc
you can just do cfset my = arguments to simplify.
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Rick,
First will you be using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC for jQuery? I'd recommend
it, even though it's still in alpha3. I'm using
Rick,
what Daemach means by 'ser/deser' is serialize/deserialize.
Serialization is taking a JavaScript object and formatting it into a
proper wdx packet (or JSON string, or whatever). De-serialization then
is the reverse of that process, taking the serialized data and turning
it back into
Rick, are you escaping the pound signs in your CF code?
Chris
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Ok... so I had working jQuery/AJAX code, but I started
tinkering with it and now it's not working... see anything
wrong with what's below?
Thanks!
Rick
script type=text/javascript
Hi folks,
It looks like my posts aren't getting through. So this is a test.
--
http://www.cjordan.us
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Sorry folks, just testing...
--
http://www.cjordan.us
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hmm... okay, it's just that a few minutes ago I did a repost and I got
an email stating that I had to wait because I posted from a
non-registered account. Well, thanks for responding Matt.
Cheers,
Chris
Matt Oakes wrote:
That one got through ;-)
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Hi folks
Andy,
I'm assuming (and please tell me if I'm wrong here, Rick) that Rick is
just using this as an example to get himself comfortable with Ajax
concepts. Have I read too much into your post Rick?
Btw, Rick, I'm writing a response, but work just stepped in the way
again so I've had to put it
Rick,
First will you be using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC for jQuery? I'd recommend
it, even though it's still in alpha3. I'm using it on a client's
application and it works just fine.
So for this mortgage calculator, you've got your form with the fields
for input (technically speaking this doesn't
Daemach,
I suppose it's just for the sake of education or something, but putting
the return value in a structure and passing it back seems like overkill
to me. Since there can be only one result from the calculation, just
pass it back as a string or numeric... no need for a structure in this
The demo page doesn't seem to work for me. Running IE6. After clicking
on one of the Show Thickbox links, the page is so jumbled looking that
it can't possibly be what you intended Klaus. Also, clicking on any
image on the page causes the image to appear *waaay* down the screen
such that I
that url
is busted.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Well
anyone know how to accomplish this in jQuery?
http://tinyurl.com/yubt54_spam
Rick
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Stith
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:53 AM
Man, I'm sorry I missed out on this thread! It looked like a good one.
Rey's right, though Rick. The jQuery/CF community is a great one. Holler
any time you need help. On the subject of AjaxCFC for jQuery. I'm using
it in a production application right now and having zero problems with
it. In
---[Hopefully this will start a new thread for this topic]---
I'd like to be able to do this sort of thing too. To block just a
particular div to indicate that something is happening in regards to
*just* that area of the screen, and that the user can continue to work
in other areas of the
Sweet Mike. Thanks!
Chris
Mike Alsup wrote:
I'd like to be able to do this sort of thing too. To block just a
particular div to indicate that something is happening in regards to *just*
that area of the screen, and that the user can continue to work in other
I'm going to add this
I've got to agree with you about the jQuery community. This is the most
friendly, and *ACTIVE* mailing list I've ever been a part of.
You may well, be right about YUI-ext getting the better end of the deal.
I dunno. I've not ever tried to use YUI.
jQuery rules!
Cheers mate!
Chris
Glen
Paul,
Have you downloaded the AjaxCFC for jQuery package from RIA Forge? It
contains examples.
Hope this helps,
Chris
Paul wrote:
About 2 weeks Rey Bango posted that AjaxCFC had been updated to
implement jQuery 1.1, but apparently the ajaxCFC demos have not yet
been updated to reflect
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Christopher Jordan
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:13 AM
*To:* jQuery Discussion.
*Subject:* Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...)
Paul,
Have you downloaded the AjaxCFC for jQuery package from RIA Forge? It
contains examples.
Hope
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Christopher Jordan
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:02 AM
*To:* jQuery Discussion.
*Subject:* Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...)
Paul,
use serialization: json in your ajaxCFC call, and when your query is
returned it will be valid JSON (which
I like that with AjaxCFC, I don't have to reinvent the wheel and can
instead use my CFCs directly. True I can still use them, but I've got to
have jQuery's in-built ajax methods call a .cfm page which in turn calls
my cfc. I'd like to cut out the middle man and go directly to the CFC.
Thanks
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Christopher Jordan
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:28 PM
*To:* jQuery Discussion.
*Subject:* Re: [jQuery] AjaxCFC (paging Rey Bango...)
I like that with AjaxCFC, I don't have to reinvent the wheel and can
instead use my CFCs directly. True
Correct me if I'm wrong here (and I probably am, lol!) but in
implementing something like this using css alone wouldn't the author
have to worry about all the browser compatibility issues? Where as with
jQuery the browser compatibility stuff has been taken care of for you...
wouldn't that be
Andy,
That's exactly what I've done in the past, and in fact was how my first
Ajax enabled programs functioned. Recently though, I've come to realize
that if all I need to do is update some value on a particular area of
the screen, I'll have CF return just the value (presumably calculated or
Paul, you forgot to eval the JSON string. Andy (or anyone, really) can
correct me if I'm wrong, but even when using the $.get method you have
to eval the JSON that gets returned.
For instance:
{TRUCK:INVALID, ISVALID:false}
Is valid. But you need to have JavaScript evaluate the string to
Hi folks,
I'm just trying to rule out a possible problem in my debugging. Does this:
$(input:hidden[name=foo]);
select all hidden inputs with the name foo? or can I not mix the
selectors in such a way?
Thanks,
Chris
--
http://www.cjordan.info
usually see things like :hidden at the end
of the string.
Joel.
On 06/02/2007, at 10:01 AM, Christopher Jordan wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm just trying to rule out a possible problem in my debugging.
Does this:
$(input:hidden[name=foo]);
select all hidden inputs with the name foo? or can I
and CSS selectors.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the XPath selector for an input element that has an
attribute called 'name'
input[name] is the CSS selector for the very same thing, but in XPath
input[name] means an input element that contains a name element
On 2/5/07, * Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL
Jörn! Great job! I've book marked it in place of the old one (which I
use quite often). :o)
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
According to the feedback I got via IRC and on this list, there are
several people using my API browser (so far known as api-draft).
This feedback gave me the motivation to
Hi folks,
I have an ajax call that upon success has a variable 'result' that
contains a JSON encoded string. I eval that string and it becomes an
object (an array of structures, etc.), but when I try returning that
object from the function to the caller, something goes wrong. The caller
says
Hi folks,
I have an ajax call that upon success has a variable 'r' that
contains a JSON encoded string. I eval that string and it becomes an
object (an array of structures, etc.), but when I try returning that
object from the function to the caller, something goes wrong. The caller
says that the
Yep. Just realized that about ten minutes ago. dagnabbit! :o( Now I've
got to rewrite a bunch of code unless I can make this call
synchronous. Which at this late hour I'd rather do. Isn't there a way to
do that in jQuery?
Chris
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Hi
PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Hi folks,
I have an ajax call that upon success has a variable 'r' that
contains a JSON encoded string. I eval that string and it becomes an
object (an array of structures, etc.), but when I try returning that
object from the function to the caller
, but at least it's
working now. :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Thanks so much for responding. I did manage to work around the
problem, by calling the function with the ajax call first and then the
function that uses the return object second. Both ways work
Brice,
I like that there are no dependencies for your plugin. I also didn't
read anything about this plug-in messing with the original margins on
the page like thickbox does. I tried using thickbox recently, but had
trouble because of its css changing the margin and padding on the body
of my
This may have already been dicussed, but I just now noticed it. Has
anyone looked at http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml#cat recently?
It now contains the different sections of the API in a collapsible
tree-view.
I think this is Jörn's baby (the link contains 'joern' so I'm making
that
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I know that css tends to get discussed
a lot around here, and I'm sure someone here will know what I'm doing wrong.
Okay, so I've got a div that contains a single p tag. In FF 2.0.0.1
this text is vertically centered inside the div. In IE 6, it is not. So,
I can
Steve,
The power of course lies in the statement $('div.section:eq(' + index
+ ')') - now all I need to do is have a class=open_button and below
it div class=section - no numeric identifiers, as jQuery is doing
the work iterating through the array of matching objects.
What is 'index'? Is
Thanks Steve, that does make sense... mostly. I'm confused by the following:
index could be changed to anything we like, as it is only for the
purpose of passing a reference to the function.
What do you mean by this? Do you mean that I don't have to use the word
index? Like this:
So, each is passing the reference to each object position as
"jQueryRocks" now instead of "index" - but it DOES need to be
consistent throughout the function.
"index" is just a more sensible label than "jQueryRocks" !!
Cheers
SJ
On 20
might do that differently is much appreciated.
Thanks heaps!
Chris
I'm probably not explaining this very well, but I hope this helps.
Blair
On 1/19/07, *Christopher Jordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I've tried narrowing down my selector criteria
Somethings wrong with the plug-in page. All the text of the plug-in list
is squished into a small column on the left.
Just thought I'd let folks know. I don't really know how else to report
it. Sorry if this isn't the right way. :o'
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://www.cjordan.info
; idateValues.length; i++);
return ($(this).attr('dateValue') == dateValues[i]);
});
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/16/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
I've got a for loop in which I have jQuery select a different DOM element
for each iteration. The code I've got that selects
Brian,
The only problem I see with that is that the dates come from the object
that I'm looping over.
I maybe should have included the entire for loop in my original post:
for(i = 0; i ThisRecordCount; i++){
ShiftDate = {ts ' +
CFJS.ListFirst(FlexOrderData.data.SHIFTDATE[i],.) + '};
Christof: Well put.
Fil: I suggest you get a thicker skin, and learn to realize when folks
are having good natured, no harm meant, fun. I personally would *love*
to see more women in the field of programming. Maybe then I could get a
date. :o) Cheer up. No one meant you any harm. :o)
Thanks for the advice Brian. I hope it will too. What do you consider a
big DOM? I'm working with three calendars on screen at a time. Given a
three month span that's somewhere in the neighborhood of 90 cells (give
or take). Of course there's three divs on the right of those, and spans,
How old are they Mike? I hope someday that I have kids who dig this
stuff as much as I do. It'll be neat to see where they could take it. :o)
Michael Geary wrote:
Guys, I don't appreciate the profanity. My 10 and 11 year old
daughters are learning JavaScript. I don't want them to be
subjected
something like this (untested):
var dateValues = ['date1', 'date2', 'date3'];
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]).filter(function() {
for (var i=0; idateValues.length; i++);
return ($(this).attr('dateValue') == dateValues[i]);
});
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/16/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Great job, guys! My hat's off to all of the separate jQuery teams! This
is such a tight and dedicated community of really bright folks, and this
release with all of its improvements and surprises just further proves
to me the strength and power of open source software and the open source
Hi folks,
This problem probably stems from my lack of CSS knowledge, but I'm sure
there's someone here who can help me.
I'm trying to use .add/removeClass() to highlight and unhighlight cells
in a calendar when hovered and change their color entirely when they're
clicked, etc.
I had this
Olaf, thanks for responding.
Olaf Bosch wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
It's
swapping out the text color, but not the background color. I'm puzzled.
Is there some reason I could be seeing these sorts of results?
Is this online, cane i see this?
Unfortunately
Olaf Marc,
Thanks so much for helping me with my CSS. It hadn't occurred to me to
first empty the style like you suggest Marc. What about using the
!important command in my CSS? Which would be better? I'm gonna run out
to the web and do some reading on the use of !important.
Thanks for
Dragan Krstic wrote:
Links on left side should be bigger. Reflection of Jquery makes
slogan no readable, and logo it self have some strange round edge... I
prefer straight more ;). Devo matters
I seem to be able to read the slogan just fine, in both FF 2.0.0.1 and
IE 6 at 1280x800. The logo
Try the ThickBox plug-in. It's meant just for that sort of thing. :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
Hi all,
I have been using $.blockUI with my ajax and image load events very
successfully. Thanks this is a great tool.
I need a modal dialog that ask if the user wants to save
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
