Dear all,
This My html
E-Mail
em*/em/label
input name=email id=email type=text
br
===
Now I want to add some html string after input tag,
like :
input name=email id=email type=text
span class=style1.../span
I try :
On 11/14/06, 董軒綜 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please give me some tips.Simply try this:(not test)$(#email).after(br/span class=style1'+tt+'/span);--
Laziness, DRY always.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 10/11/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi jQueryians,
I'd like to present you a first draft for a new stylesheet for the
jQuery API: http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml
There is still lot's of work to do, but the main concern, a new concept
for the navigation, is already
Dear Chen,
it's work! thanks a lot!!
Tung
Realazy XA Chen 写道:
On 11/14/06, 董軒綜 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please
give me some tips.
Simply try this:(not test)
$("#email").after("br/span
class="style1"'+tt+'/span");
--
Laziness, DRY always.
Hi Sam!
It would serve as both documentation and a demo of work done by the
community. It also needs to be quick (so using too many plugins may
slow the page down).
Actually I'm trying to get it working without Javascript. That should guarantee
good speed even with JS.
The draft does not
I'd like to present you a first draft for a new stylesheet for the
jQuery API: http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml
How about adding quicksearch to the navigation?
Yes, let's power the API docs with jQuery's own plugins! Great work so
far Jörn!
-- Klaus
On Monday, November 13, 2006 9:08 PM Matt Grimm said:
What would be an ideal way to refresh an image whose src attribute is
a script that dynamically generates the image? Would it be best to
store the value of the src attribute in a variable, remove the img
element from the DOM, and append a
Say I have a list:
ul id=mylist
liItem 1/li
liItem 2/li
liItem 3/li
liItem 4/li
liItem 5/li
/ul
I attach a click event to each (actually I would append an anchor and
attach to that, but for simplicities sake). How would I then get all
nodes prior to it (i.e. if I click Item
I have extended your plugin: I needed the ability to fill the body of
the tooltip with individual content. So I have set an additional
option: bodyHandler, which can be set to a function reference. Now,
save can handle this:
} else if (settings.bodyHandler) {
tTitle.html(title);
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Hi folks,
what is your preferred approach to display messages? Think of validation
messages for a form.
I'm looking for an approach that would work for both client- and serverside
generated messages.
For example, a form is validated via JS and displays some
Trac is used for version control and the Wiki:
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracWiki
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 14/11/06, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to present you a first draft for a new stylesheet for the
jQuery API: http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml
How about adding quicksearch to the navigation?
Yes, let's power the API docs with jQuery's own plugins! Great work
Jorn,
Here's an example that I've been playing around with:
http://beta.ksscholl.com/jquery/form2col.html
This offers the user a message as to the nature of the error, as well as
marking the label for the affected field. In this sample, the message(s) are
placed at the beginning of the
Gilles,
There is also a scenario where user checks few checkboxes then decides
to select all, the result is that the previously checked boxes toggle
back to un-checked. The select-all function only needs to toggle between
select all and select none.
What do you think?
roso
Webunity | Gilles
Hi Paul!
Nice to see you got it working. The callback is a feature of the next
release.
Excellent! Thanks Jörn. I implemented almost exactly the same work
around
as Bruce when I needed a call back. But I'm wondering for your rewrite
are
you going to go with a callback setting, or
Meanwhile, you can take a quick look a that discussion and it may point
you
in the right direction.
Good idea -- I found it and got it to work on first try. Here's the
method Jörn's suggested (as I implemented it):
Thanks Ben Jörn
Nice to see you got it working. The callback is a
One suggestion, I really love in the php documentation: it should be
possible to add user comments to every navigation point. I think, that
such a feature is very helpful.
It's true that the comments in the PHP documentation are very helpful. I wonder
if it would be better to add a discussion
On 14/11/06, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Collett schrieb:
Say I have a list:
ul id=mylist
liItem 1/li
liItem 2/li
liItem 3/li
liItem 4/li
liItem 5/li
/ul
I attach a click event to each (actually I would append an anchor and
attach to that,
If you have a jquery array of elements and need to call the show(slow)
method on each one in turn, how should you do it?
For instance how might would you reveal each LI element in a list one after
the other?
Just applying the show() method reveals them all at once eg: $(#myList
LI).show(slow) so
If you have a jquery array of elements and need to call the show(slow)
method on each one in turn, how should you do it?
For instance how might would you reveal each LI element in a list one
after
the other?
Just applying the show() method reveals them all at once eg: $(#myList
On 14/11/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sam!
It would serve as both documentation and a demo of work done by the
community. It also needs to be quick (so using too many plugins may
slow the page down).
Actually I'm trying to get it working without Javascript. That should
How about adding quicksearch to the navigation?
Thanks Sam, great idea! Rik's plugin is awesome anyway, and here we have a nice
usecase. Will do!
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
Ein Herz für Kinder - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de
Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name
Can someone please give me a short primer on the recommended way to extend
a
jQuery plug-in? I have created a couple of basic plug-ins and have plans
for several others, however, I would like to be able to take advantage of
the basic plug-in functionality to create more complex plug-ins but
Thanks Jörn, good idea, that did the trick.
With some fiddling I was able to reduce the code to look like this, so it
can be applied to any list of elements:
var showInSequence = function($el){
if($el $el.is())
$el.eq(0).show(slow, function(){
Very handy, thanks Choan.
By the way the little code rewrite I posted uses .next() because it assumes
the elements are siblings (which was ok for my purposes).
Jorn's technique, which you also use in your code, does not have this
restriction so it is better.
George
Choan C. Gálvez wrote:
Hi folks,
what is your preferred approach to display messages? Think of validation
messages for a form.
I'm looking for an approach that would work for both client- and serverside
generated messages.
For example, a form is validated via JS and displays some messages. Now the
user disables
On 11/14/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a jquery array of elements and need to call the show(slow)
method on each one in turn, how should you do it?
For instance how might would you reveal each LI element in a list one
after
the other?
Just applying the
I've experienced problem in IE6 when trying to refresh an image by changing the src attribute. My code looked like this:$('._valCode', divVote).src('../images/validationCode.php?w=50h=17t=' + new Date().getTime());
IE6 would not display the image until I clicked Show Picture in the right click
On your plazes page, the field highlighting doesn't seem to be correct. I
would need to press it twice to get the right field highlighted.
Klaus Hartl-3 wrote:
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Hi folks,
what is your preferred approach to display messages? Think of validation
messages for a form.
And I believe Drupal is the CMS behind the rest of it.
m.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of howard chen
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:15 AM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: [jQuery] Which CMS / Wiki jQuery.com is using
as title...
Hi AllJust wanna to know your opinions on Run (yet another js framework) and to compare it to the jquery way.It was on ajaxian :
http://ajaxian.com/archives/run-universal-_javascript_-animation-frameworkand there is a few exemples at : http://run.aka-fotos.de/examples.phpI found the code for the
On 11/14/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice to see you got it working. The callback is a feature of the next release.Excellent! Thanks Jörn. I implemented almost exactly the same work around as Bruce when I needed a call back. But I'm wondering for your rewrite are you going to go
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
One suggestion, I really love in the php documentation: it should
be possible to add user comments to every navigation point. I
think, that such a feature is very helpful.
It's true that the comments in the PHP documentation are very
helpful. I wonder if it would be
On 11/14/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
what is your preferred approach to display messages? Think of validation
messages for a form.
I'm looking for an approach that would work for both client- and serverside
generated messages.
I always append a div with an
Hi Klaus!
Hi Jörn, I think both messages for a form submit with server roundtrip
and on-the-fly validation doesn't have to be the same necessarily...
Here's an example: http://beta.plazes.com/register/
* Submit the form and you will get error messages gathered on top of the
form, and
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
As far as I know, that is yet an unresearched topic.
So far there is a nice guide and tons of example code for writing plugins,
but not for
extending them.
So far someone extends his local copy for his own needs and trie to
contribute them back to
the original.
Brandon Aaron schrieb:
I always append a div with an unordered list of elements above the
form and then link each error message to an input.
That's nice and I do that too. Most browsers don't focus a field from a
link pointing to the field's id, so I usually add a click event to
explicitly
I've updated cssHover with some new stuff, check out the discussion on
this topic earlier in the mailinglist.
Basicly i added a new function, so you can use this.click() to toggle
the state, and this.chSetState(true|false) to change the state. You
can also use this.chSetState(true|false, TRUE)
Jorn,One idea for form validation (don't know how practical it would be to code)...would be that the next/following input is only enabled if the current input is successfully filled with the correct data.So the scenario would be that on inputting data into input No1, if the input is not validated
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Good example. But I think the same effect can be achieved by simply using the
standard
settings/options mechanism. You can just define a certain function as default
and override it
via options.
Yep, that would work nicely, as long as the default settings/options were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilles,
There is also a scenario where user checks few checkboxes then decides
to select all, the result is that the previously checked boxes toggle
back to un-checked. The select-all function only needs to toggle between
select all and select none.
What do you
I've got mouseover code I've been using for several years now. It works
really well and is pretty streamlined, although it requires I instantiate
each image (used for preloading). You can see it below. I'm wondering if
anyone has a plugin which duplicates this functionality.
I saw Gilles plugin
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:14 AM ReynierPM said:
.header_b
{
display: inline;
}
So I need to change it to block in IE. Can any help me with this?
Cheers and thanks in advance
Within CSS you can do the following to apply styles to IE only. (This
hack may be fixed in IE7 not
I'm newbie using jQuery. I want to make a function for do some changes
when a page load. I need to change some properties for CSS when the
browser is IE. For example my CSS contains this rules:
.header_b
{
display: inline;
}
So I need to change it to block in IE. Can any help me with
as title...
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Sam Collett schrieb:
Say I have a list:
ul id=mylist
liItem 1/li
liItem 2/li
liItem 3/li
liItem 4/li
liItem 5/li
/ul
I attach a click event to each (actually I would append an anchor and
attach to that, but for simplicities sake). How would I then get all
nodes
Hi Mathias!
I have extended your plugin: I needed the ability to fill the body of
the tooltip with individual content. So I have set an additional
option: bodyHandler, which can be set to a function reference. Now,
save can handle this:
} else if (settings.bodyHandler) {
Hi,
I'm trying to use some jquery basics here:
http://www.allergique.org/allergiqueNew/
-slide down/up (on the left menu) works quite fine.
Just a problem with safari where the text after the menu that slide
let some characters visible when it moves up with safari (and only
with it).
In IE6, when clicking on a link on the left, it scrolls down on the right,
but you can no longer see the links on the left.
The right side doesn't have the overflow on it correctly. FF works
properly
though.
I wrote in my initial post that you shouldn't bother testing it in IE :-)
Thanks
Here's an example that I've been playing around with:
http://beta.ksscholl.com/jquery/form2col.html
This offers the user a message as to the nature of the error, as well as
marking the label for the affected field. In this sample, the message(s) are
placed at the beginning of the section
Although this would be great for the programmer I think
this would be horrible for the user experience. That's not how a user would
expect to interact with a form. You could "solve" that problem with giving them
an explanation about your form... but then you're giving them more things to
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:35 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Most browsers don't focus a field from
a link pointing to the field's id, so I usually add a click event to
explicitly focus the form element. The field to focus is simply read
from the link's href...
Unless I'm misunderstanding your
http://glenlipka.kokopop.com/jQuery/inlineError.htm
This was an early prototype for what is now currently live on all of Intuit's websites.
From a UX design standpoint, here are some guidelines:
1. Bigger text fields. Many (most?) users have sketchy vision and flickering monitors. Make the text
Some sites we just launched using jQuery:
1. http://www.payroll.com. Used jQuery for manipulating the icons on the local nav and creating some visual effects.
2. http://www.intuit.com. Currently running 3 tests. 2 with tons of jQuery and 1 with minimal.(delete cookies and refresh to see)I used
Sorry for top post. Blame Outlook.
Since you seem interested to know a thing or two about
usability here are some comments. :)
3. This is assuming that _javascript_ is enabled
right?
4. When would tabbing not be allowed? Also, the tabbing in
your sample form is all out of whack. I think
Great points, Im saving this thread
for inspiration the next time I have a form to build I love this list J
-ALEX
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006
9:49 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery]
Chris W. Parker schrieb:
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:35 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Most browsers don't focus a field from
a link pointing to the field's id, so I usually add a click event to
explicitly focus the form element. The field to focus is simply read
from the link's href...
On Nov 14, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chris W. Parker wrote:
Within CSS you can do the following to apply styles to IE only. (This
hack may be fixed in IE7 not sure.)
.header_b
{
display: inline; /* non-IE */
_display: block; /* IE only */
}
Adding a '_' to any style makes all non-IE
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:33 AM Karl Swedberg said:
I think the preferred method for targeting a browser for certain
style rules is to include your main stylesheet first in the head
element and then use conditional comments to include browser-specific
stylesheets.
[snip]
Thanks for
Thanks for reply Karl. Let me see if I understand the thing you try to
said me. First if I do this:
.header_b { display:block }
this only be interpreted by IE and others browsers, but If I do this in
the same style
#div_header .header_b { display: inline }
then this will be read by any browser !=
Awesome looking sites!
I have a Q about your use of jquery...
script type=text/javascript
src=/payroll_includes/js/jquery-latest.pack.js;jsessionid=2DWFPTAN13NGECQIBMUBX1QKBAFSWF4K/script
script language=javascript type=text/javascript
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:33 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Hi Chris,
Hi Klaus,
I wonder how browser behave
when the field is out of the borders of the viewport... will they
scroll down? Not sure...
That is the behavior I have always experienced. Though I should say I
don't do any testing in
probably to prevent the browser from using the same cached js file between sessionsOn 11/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Awesome looking sites!
I have a Q about your use of jquery...script type=text/_javascript_src="">script language=_javascript_ type=text/_javascript_
Hi,
1. http://www.payroll.com. Used jQuery for manipulating the icons on the
local nav and creating some visual effects.
Works fine with Firefox, but in Konqueror (3.5.5) I don't even see the
content. The tab-widget with its contents is simply not there.
Christof
Glen,
How did you implement the three different sites for
Intuit.com on the server side? I'd really be interested in
knowing.
Thanks,Chris.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen
LipkaSent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:58 AMTo: jQuery
Discussion.Subject:
In a big corporation, sometimes you have the power of inertia. I can't find anyone who knows why those sessionIDs are on the link, nor can I find someone willing to change it. I would rather have a date/time stamp on them. Oh well.
The site uses ATG. Intuit is actually REALLY good about testing.
This is just off the top of my head.
I have used a number of java-web-frameworks and appending session id
information to links are a way of storing a session when the client has
turned of cockies.
Way this is happening on your site, i don't know.
Might give you some insight.
/christian
I organized the answers inline. This probably breaks email ettiquette. - Glen
1. Bigger text fields. Many (most?) users have sketchy vision and flickering monitors. Make the text boxes bigger and they will be happier. Same goes for the submit buttons.
2. Have a visual indication next to required
Hi folks,
I was looking at the toggleClass method in the API, and it says this:
jQuerytoggleClass( String class )
Adds the specified class if it is present, removes it if it is not
present.
I'm finding myself confused by this. The example shows:
Example:
$("p").toggleClass("selected")
As you quite rightly say, the $() 'doohickey' returns a jquery object that
is a bit like an array of zero or more html elements.
Without some help, regular javascript won't know what to do with the
doohickey, so if you need the element itself you extract it using the
.get(0) method (where 0
Makes sure to force the browser to load the js file and not reuse whats
in the cache.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:56 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] jQuery sites
ReynierPM schrieb:
Thanks for reply Karl. Let me see if I understand the thing you try to
said me. First if I do this:
.header_b { display:block }
this only be interpreted by IE and others browsers, but If I do this in
the same style
#div_header .header_b { display: inline }
then this will
-- Original message --
From: Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. This is assuming that javascript is enabled right?
Yes. Although, at this date, I actually believe in forcing the user to have
javascript on. I am making alot of assumptions. Color monitor, screen
Hi Everyone -
I want to start a discussion about the features that should go into
(or be removed from) the upcoming 1.1 release. I'd like to shoot for a
release by the end of this month.
I know that Joern already has some event code, ready to be committed -
and I have the non-destructive jQuery
A little overkill don't you think? How likely is it that the jquery file
will change during a user's session?
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced coldfusion programmer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original
Hey all,
I have a site that needs to be able to run on both a server and a cd and i
have to call in an xml file. I have it up and running, but the amount of
code i needed to use is, well, to much.
How do i go about using jquery to call in this xml file?
url in question:
Not sure if this went through the first time, so I'm resending.
-
I've got mouseover code I've been using for several years now. It works
really well and is pretty streamlined, although it requires I instantiate
each image (used for preloading). You can see it below.
one reason: Proxy servers could send the same script to different
people. they can't with the extra query param.
On 11/14/06, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little overkill don't you think? How likely is it that the jquery file
will change during a user's session?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
-- Original message --
From: Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. This is assuming that javascript is enabled right?
Yes. Although, at this date, I actually believe in forcing the user to have
javascript on. I am making alot of
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Better not use it! Why?
The short answer: Just don't do it.
The longer answer:
You are targeting browsers that still get developed further with that
hack, e.g. IE 7. IE 6 and below do not support advanced CSS2 selectors
like the child
I'm personally not sure that the entire ajax.js should be part of the
core. jQuery to me is about DOM searching and manipulation. Its Ajax
features are excellent, but I wouldn't cry at all if I had to include
the ajax plugin or official extension or whatever you'd like to
call it, only when I
On 11/14/06, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but we looked at usability tests and concluded that the more power-user the person was, the more they found it annoying, and the more newbie the person was, the more they found it helpful. But power users don't get frustrated and quit, while newbies
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am SO glad to see someone else mention this. In my mind, users who
do not have Javascript enabled in this day and age fall are missing
out on a LOT the Web has to offer. And why? Most often, because
someone has filled their
Wait... does ';' function like '?' -- if yes, I learned something :)
--Jacob
A little overkill don't you think? How likely is it that the jquery file
will change during a user's session?
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced coldfusion programmer
-- Original message --
From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This isn't to say that our sites should fail miserably if the user
DOES disabled Javascript.
Not only should it not fail miserably, it shouldn't fail at all. Search
engines don't understand js
3. Sure. We make a lot of assumptions when building
websites. But the important thing about those assumptions is when things go
wrong how will it affect the user? Someone has a black white screen? Well
they wouldn't see the colors anyway. Not a BIG deal. They know they're monitor
doesn't
This seemed to be a bug that affected several apps so I wanted to let
the list know I just posted a fix to SVN.
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/276/
Please test if you can because 1.0.4 is coming soon and we don't want
to introduce bugs or cause problems with any existing plugins.
--
Brandon
Hi guys,
The changes to cssHover and interface iresizable are committed to SVN.
Also the demo page for cssHover is up again, showing the new features.
-- Gilles
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I'm almost inclined to agree. When planning out the structure for the
new documentation I realized that the 'Ajax' section was really more
of a Design Methodologies/Cookbook section, more than anything else.
Whereas the core dom/css is more of a toolset of functionality.
That being said - Ajax
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:17 PM John Resig said:
I know that Joern already has some event code, ready to be committed -
and I have the non-destructive jQuery code ready to go. Brandon
mentioned that he wants to rewrite the jQuery.attr() in time for
release too.
I hope one feature he
The main suggestion I would have is that if you remove something, make
it available in either a plugin or some archived form to allow folks to
take advantage of new features while not breaking their existing apps.
The serialization code for example, could be removed but should be
accessible in
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Based on some other replies, I guess I wasn't clear in my
statement(s). I'm not advocating depending on Javascript, not at all.
However, I don't think we should do away with the bells and whistles
(read: enhancements) that it
On 11/14/06, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That being said - Ajax functionality is used a lot. If it were
extracted, I'd want to have a special jquery+ajax build to go along
with it.
I think that would be an excellent compromise. It's actually what I
have pre-built for myself. I have 1
I'm having the same problem. Also serialization doesn't appear to be working, even in the demo.Cheers,Chris
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Based on some other replies, I guess I wasn't clear in my statement(s). I'm
not advocating depending on Javascript, not at all. However, I don't think we
should do away with the bells and whistles (read: enhancements) that it
offers, as some people in the industry
Don't rely on JavaScript, but use it as a tool for Progressive
Enhancement.
Hear, hear! You have no way of knowing why their brower can't use
JavaScript (or CSS, or Flash, etc.), so why should you penalize them for it?
Does that mean we agree about that? Maybe I wasn't clear...
-- Original message --
From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Based on some other replies, I guess I wasn't clear in my
statement(s). I'm not advocating depending on Javascript, not at all.
Perhaps a download configuration tool similar to what is offered with the
interface plug-in? Allowing the user to choose the modules he/she needs, thus
creating their customized baseline JQuery file on the fly, would be great!
Kevin
___
jQuery
On 11/14/06, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that mean we agree about that? Maybe I wasn't clear...Yes, that means we agree. That question was directed at the people that seemed to advocating a reliance on _javascript_.
___
jQuery mailing list
Hi guys,I recently had the wish for extended functions on arrays, hashs and objects like Prototype provides with extending the Array() object. I often used features like without() and truncate(). I am really thinking of rewriting/porting a lot of stuff for jQuery and call it jQuery Methods, but I
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
