Hi Marco,
a bit late in the thread... but i left this email to reply in my
inbox... and then just slipped.
Marco Cawthorne wrote:
Hello list, I just wanted to represent myself here and my colleagues
at Vera Visions, L.L.C. that work with GNUstep daily because
our internal applications rely
Oh and also...
>From a RECENT (i.e. two weeks ago) XIB file created with the LATEST version
of Xcode somehow, I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU when you say that Apple has
abandoned the Cocoa name given that is still being used prominently in the
Development tools and is still mentioned in the
Just adding a bit of food for thought here regarding the use of the term
"Cocoa". BTW, I didn't know that, in the last message, somehow my
comments ended up in a color that was the same as the background. That
was not on purpose. Stupid Gmail...
Anyway... here is a NON retired document in
Hey Marco
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 19:04 Marco Cawthorne wrote:
> On 2023-07-28 11:25:28 -0700 Gregory Casamento
> wrote:
>
> Hello list, I just wanted to represent myself here and my colleagues
> at Vera Visions, L.L.C. that work with GNUstep daily because
> our internal applications rely on
On 2023-07-28 11:25:28 -0700 Gregory Casamento
wrote:
Hello list, I just wanted to represent myself here and my colleagues
at Vera Visions, L.L.C. that work with GNUstep daily because
our internal applications rely on it.
GSDE is a great and exciting project. Someone I know and myself have
There already is
http://www.aiei.ch/gnustep/
--
Svetlana
Liam,
I won't respond point by point because I agree with most of what you're
saying. There has been, for the last 3-5 years a real need for GNUstep to
start a "reference distribution". I think it was discussed here on the
list more than once. The issue has not been the desire to create one,
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 03:04, Gregory Casamento
wrote:
> Which part? Also, who do you believe reads your articles? It is important
> to play to both parts of the audience. Developers, while not the majority,
> are extremely important because without them you can't create the engagement
>
Hi,
On 2023-07-21 11:55:10 + Xavier wrote:
Greg,
So let's move on and do something about this. IMHO GnuStep need an
updated
website at first, because current one looks old for young devs (even
if we
like it), it certainly doesn't help to think that GnuStep is MacOs
Api -- I
Hi,
OpenStep not NeXTSTEP :) :)
On 2023-07-10 13:49:16 + Liam Proven wrote:
We've gone around the NeXTstep-vs-MacOS thing before. I don't know if
you remember.
*In this case*, no, I have to disagree.
GSDE seems to me to very clearly and definitely be trying to recreate
NeXTstep, *not*
Liam,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 7:02 AM Liam Proven wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 08:27, Gregory Casamento
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, visually, GSDE is trying to look like OPENSTEP/NeXTSTEP. But, in
> your article when you refer to GNUstep tries to recreate NeXTSTEP... that
> statement ENTIRELY
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 08:27, Gregory Casamento
wrote:
>
> Yes, visually, GSDE is trying to look like OPENSTEP/NeXTSTEP. But, in your
> article when you refer to GNUstep tries to recreate NeXTSTEP... that
> statement ENTIRELY belies the fact that we have implemented all of OPENSTEP
> and are
Xavier,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 07:56 Xavier wrote:
> Greg,
> So let's move on and do something about this. IMHO GnuStep need an updated
> website at first, because current one looks old for young devs (even if we
> like it), it certainly doesn't help to think that GnuStep is MacOs Api -- I
>
Greg,
So let's move on and do something about this. IMHO GnuStep need an updated
website at first, because current one looks old for young devs (even if we like
it), it certainly doesn't help to think that GnuStep is MacOs Api -- I
volunteer to work on this.
There is tons of new projects
Liam,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:49 AM Liam Proven wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 17:51, Gregory Casamento
> wrote:
> >
> > I am really happy to see this article. I only have one bit of
> feedback...
> >
> > "GNUstep has been around since the 1990s, and has re-implemented a
> substantial
Le 10 juillet 2023 15:43:45 GMT+02:00, Liam Proven a écrit :
>On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 11:37, Xavier Brochard wrote
>Does that help?
Yes, thanks! It help a lot. I dont want to write something too enthusiastic and
far from peoples expectations as there is kind of desktop "standard" now.
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 17:51, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>
> I am really happy to see this article. I only have one bit of feedback...
>
> "GNUstep has been around since the 1990s, and has re-implemented a
> substantial amount of NeXTstep, completely from scratch. "
>
> Could we please stop saying
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 11:37, Xavier Brochard wrote:
>
> Very nice presentation, thanks.
Thank you! I am glad you liked it.
> You've said in a previous paper thet there were really 2 desktop
> paradigm on Linux, though many were invented.
That is not really what I was getting at, no.
What I
I am really happy to see this article. I only have one bit of feedback...
"GNUstep has been around since the 1990s, and has re-implemented a
substantial amount of NeXTstep, completely from scratch. "
Could we please stop saying NEXTSTEP? This only furthers the
misunderstanding that GNUstep is
Very nice presentation, thanks.
I'm curently writing on NsCDE and GSDE (in french), and I have a
question:
You've said in a previous paper thet there were really 2 desktop
paradigm on Linux, though many were invented. In this regard, how did
you feel with GSDE ? was it consistent as a
That is OnFlapp's GNUstep Desktop Environment...
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/two_new_debian_desktops/
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624
21 matches
Mail list logo
