Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Paul M
RB wrote: I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - what we've done is to make a few tweaks and install syslog-ng 1/ change

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread RB
what we've done is to make a few tweaks and install syslog-ng I seriously considered that, but for the added 'complexity' and not everyone on the team being on the same page, the most supportable approach is simply increasing the sizes clog initializes its files to. Some experimentation

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 4/14/08, Paul M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RB wrote: I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - what we've done is to make

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Paul M
Scott Ullrich wrote: On 4/14/08, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have commited some code to help with this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/www/guiconfig.inc?rev=1.90.2.50;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup Woops, wrong URL:

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-11 Thread RB
a few other things we'd like to see as well, if you would be willing to rewrite the logging system we can discuss further. Any progress on an Hg feed or at least anonymous CVS (cvsup hasn't built on Linux for quite some time)? I'd be a lot more gung-ho about development and submitting patches