Hi Waren,
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 6:30:06 PM UTC+2 vwa...@gmail.com wrote:
> We'd love to hear thoughts and feedback around the possibility of moving
> forward with a DEP enhancement proposal, with a commitment from Microsoft
> to providing continued dedicated support for the 1st party
> Then there is also the question on how to ensure continued commitment
from Microsoft -- what happens when Microsoft (or the current PM/PO or
whatever) looses interest?
IMO. This is the biggest one.
What I'd expect to see here is MS taking up a long-term corporate
sponsorship of the DSF,
Hi,
IMO, Django is there to create value for *its* users.
I'm not aware how MS Team reached this conclusion that merging their incomplete
package into Django core creates more value for Django users than when it is a
third-party package. Would you please tell me how?
I have access to only two
I agree with Tim’s sentiment here. Had a solid SQL Server backend been
available 7 or 8 years ago, I would probably have used that due to the
requirements from my supervisor. I had to convince him that PostgreSQL would be
just as good.
Based on what I read on the Git page, though, the backend
Full disclosure: I've helped maintain SQL Server Django engine packages in
the past, and was involved in getting the project started for the official
Microsoft Django engine package.
First, thanks to Warren and the folks from Microsoft for creating this
backend. There are a fair amount of
Hi All,
Thanks for the feedback thus far - this is going to help inform my ongoing
discussions within Microsoft and I feel like we are getting to the heart of
pros/cons/concerns around MSSQL + Django.
I appreciate there are diverse stances on this subject, and feel like this
conversation is a
