Hi Keith,
2015-04-29 19:09 GMT+02:00 Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net:
Greetings All;
Just checked the archives and it is just shy of 2.5 years since this
list was started and what do we have to show for it? Basically nothing.
There are pieces and sections of guides in various
Hello Dave,
Hi all,
2015-04-30 9:19 GMT+02:00 Dave davepo...@gmail.com:
Is it completely unrealistic to ask O'Reilly if they might publish a newer
version of their book on OpenOffice?
The principal issue is to having something under the Apache License and
reusable by the AOO project.
As the
Is it completely unrealistic to ask O'Reilly if they might publish a newer
version of their book on OpenOffice?
On 30 April 2015 at 07:27, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/15 02:36, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
about the current effort to do documentation for version 4 by the
Hi all
can someone briefly explain the (dis)advantages of working with
odf-authors? how far are they with their documentation?
On 30 April 2015 at 17:29, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Jonathon,
jonathon schrieb:
Let's rephrase the question. Do you understand why
Throwing in another 2 cents (I'm up to 4!):
Why not try to get an objective outside opinion?
http://idratherbewriting.com/ --pretty good blog from a technical
writer who wasn't always a technical writer. He might be able to look
at the whole situation and maybe give some advice and direction
On 30/04/15 15:29, Regina Henschel wrote:
And you cannot blame the people, who write for LibreOffice. There are
so few persons working on LibreOffice documentation, that they cannot
follow the changes in LibreOffice soon.
I'll grant that ODFAuthors doesn't have many people. Regardless, that
jonathon wrote:
On 30/04/15 15:29, Regina Henschel wrote:
And you cannot blame the people, who write for LibreOffice. There are
so few persons working on LibreOffice documentation, that they cannot
follow the changes in LibreOffice soon.
I'll grant that ODFAuthors doesn't have many
Hi Jonathon,
jonathon schrieb:
Let's rephrase the question. Do you understand why ODFAuthor's is not
creating documentation for specifically for Apache OpenOffice?
ODF Authors is only the working environment. The website starts with
This is a development site for LibreOffice and Apache
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Alexandro
I agree and would like to propose a roadmap that people can follow (hands
off) and they can continue ongoing work. emphasizing that if they want to
contribute, they need to self-taught and self-do without waiting for
approval. We just dont have enough
jonathon wrote:
On 29/04/15 17:09, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Jonathon;
We have a tracking document that is supposed to be used so all members of
the team know where things are and what is needed but it rarely gets used.
I'd suggest the tracking document is rarely used, because nobody is
Hi. Just adding my two cents:
I never knew that you guys had a tracking document. So, maybe it
doesn't get used because no one knows it's there?
I like Rania's idea of a spreadsheet--something up front where it's
easily found, and everyone can see what's going on.
I had noticed too that there
De Angela Jackson wrote:
Hi. Just adding my two cents:
I never knew that you guys had a tracking document. So, maybe it
doesn't get used because no one knows it's there?
If you didn't realize that it was there I apologize. It is referenced in
the main index of the user guide with a link to
jonathon wrote:
On 29/04/15 19:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Work has been on certain pieces of the documentation but the status document
has never been updated,
Other than some documentation on the wiki, what has been produced within
the last two years, that is not currently listed?
On 30/04/15 02:36, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
about the current effort to do documentation for version 4 by the
project under the Apache license.
What is your proposal to prevent/minimize the odds of a repeat of why
ODFAuthors no longer is providing documentation for Apache OpenOffice?
jonathon
14 matches
Mail list logo
