Hello Dave
I was just thinking out aloud. Adding Chapter may be a way of improving cross
referencing and/or using fields. It needs some thought. Suggested this because
I am assembling the Draw Guide ready for publishing. I am coming across a few
problems with the referencing. I need to make a
Hi Peter,
At the time of the final revision for the 6.x template we still had a
horribly confusing mix of OOo and LO style naming and the team
contributors agreed that we should stick with the standard names where
possible. Hence, there was no need to add new names like Chapter Title
and Chapter
Hello Everybody
Another reason why we should stay with sans serif fonts. They are easier to
read when you are quickly referencing to a user guide. My mail program uses
sans serif and it is so easy to read.
Regards
Peter Schofield
Sent from my iPad Mini
> On 4 Jun 2020, at 17:04, Dave wrote:
Hello Dave
I shall check the template 6 copy I have and let you know what I find. However,
that will have to wait until tomorrow when I am at my Mac mini. Your list I
looks about right for any template. Only exception I can think of at the moment
is that there should be Chapter Title and
I keep forgetting LO lists only use outdated teletype formatting, so
Iam repeating my previous post in quill pen and parchment style:Hi
Peter,The original 6.x template has/had:30 Applied Paragraph Styles +
Default=CaptionCodeContents 1Contents 2Contents
3Contents
I keep forgetting LO lists only use outdated teletype formatting, so I
am repeating my previous post in quill pen and parchment style:
Hi Peter,
The original 6.x template has/had:
30 Applied Paragraph Styles + Default
=
Caption
Code
Contents 1
Contents 2
Contents 3
Hi Peter,The original 6.x template has/had:30 Applied Paragraph Styles +
Default=CaptionCodeContents 1Contents 2Contents
3Contents HeadingDefinition TermFigureFooterGuide NameHeading 1Heading 2Heading
3Heading CautionHeading NoteHeading TipListList 1List 2Numbering
Hello
There is nothing wrong with LO version 6 template, except the number of styles.
The only thing that needs doing is serious look at the number of styles and the
question should be asked is do we need the all.
The version 6 template does need to be updated to match what is happening in
I will not be joining today's meeting, but since my name still appears
in some of the proposed template's comments I will make some observations:
* Is there really any important reason to make major changes to the
existing 6.x template, or is this just change for the sake of change?
* I agree
Hi Olivier,
Some personal thoughts on your proposed LO7 template, in advance of the
team meeting to be held later.
I think that switching the Text Body paragraph style from a sans serif
font to a serif font is an important decision which shouldn’t be made
without proper consideration of its
10 matches
Mail list logo
