[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-19 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:51 PM, khagaroth wrote: >> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml >> > I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance). What will be in the installation set of course is independent of what is used as

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-19 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jan, *, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100: > >> > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and >> > Documentation teams, but they should know :-) >> >> It does not seem transparent for the

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-19 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Olivier, Olivier Hallot píše v So 17. 12. 2016 v 14:54 -0200: > One thing I'd like to add for evaluation of using XML for the help > contents in browsers is that, in my experience: > > * XSLT (XML style sheets), XPath and XQuery are another technologies > to master. > > * An error in a

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-17 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hi Jan Em 16/12/2016 15:41, Jan Holesovsky escreveu: > Hi, > > khagaroth píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 17:51 +0100: > >>> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance). >> html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need) >>> in the help files

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 12/16/2016 05:38 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > * there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html ('s and > 's vs. and vs. 's with css vs. who-knows-what) > which would make the help harder to maintain, if we eg. want to reuse > the information from there to generate other

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hi All Em 16/12/2016 14:51, khagaroth escreveu: >> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml >> >> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance). > html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need) >> in the help files (like or

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, khagaroth píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 17:51 +0100: > > I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance). > > html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need) > > in the help files (like or to name few) > > > > Both and are part of HTML 5

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread khagaroth
> > it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml > > I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance). html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need) > in the help files (like or to name few) > Both and are part of HTML 5 and

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jan, Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100: > > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and > > Documentation teams, but they should know :-) > > It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl > and sr) please do not forget those. Thanks

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Getting rid of 'oldref' in the help files

2016-12-16 Thread Jan Iversen
> this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and > Documentation teams, but they should know :-) It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl and sr) please do not forget those. It does also influence the help repo (of course), since the change will be a