Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-05-07 Thread Lailah
Oh, so sorry! I just answered your email. Regards El jue, 03-05-2012 a las 11:21 +0100, Hazel Russman escribió: On Wed, 02 May 2012 09:46:38 -0300 Lailah lailah...@gmail.com wrote: Hazel: I was revisiting this old mails (basically to put them in Trash) and found a

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-05-03 Thread Hazel Russman
On Wed, 02 May 2012 09:46:38 -0300 Lailah lailah...@gmail.com wrote: Hazel: I was revisiting this old mails (basically to put them in Trash) and found a little thing that sounds strange to me: The Foundation holds all rights to the project and was legally founded on

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-05-03 Thread Tom Davies
after another, such as operational efficiency prevent the formation so TDF may have set a record for soemthing of this size. Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 3/5/12, Hazel Russman hazeldeb...@googlemail.com wrote: From: Hazel Russman hazeldeb...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [libreoffice

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-05-02 Thread Jean Weber
Please see this blog post, which explains the significance of that date: http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/02/20/the-document-foundation-officially-incorporated-in-berlin-germany/ Founded may not be the best word here; we should probably change it to incorporated. Jean On 02/05/2012, at

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-11 Thread David Nelson
Hi Hazel, On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Hazel Russman hazeldeb...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm trying to do a proper English version of this. I can't do it on the wiki because it won't let me register. Their capchas are so fiendishly distorted that I can't read them at all. Please do mail me

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-10 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi Hazel, Am 09.04.2012 13:53, schrieb Hazel Russman: I'm trying to do a proper English version of this. I can't do it on the wiki because it won't let me register. Their capchas are so fiendishly distorted that I can't read them at all. It seems that you managed it: 2012-04-09T18:02:39

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-10 Thread Tom Davies
...@sophia-louise.de wrote: From: klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Tuesday, 10 April, 2012, 8:51 Hi Hazel, Am 09.04.2012 13:53, schrieb Hazel Russman: I'm trying to do a proper English version

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) The English version apparently wasn't written by a native English speaker.  Obviously Star Office was bought BY Sun not from Sun.  Most people probably wouldn't notice little slips like that as the meaning was very clear due to the context.  Regards from Tom :) --- On Mon, 9/4/12,

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Hazel Russman
I'm trying to do a proper English version of this. I can't do it on the wiki because it won't let me register. Their capchas are so fiendishly distorted that I can't read them at all. On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:39:37 +0100 (BST) Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) The English version

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Hazel Russman
Here is the first paragraph: In the mid-80s, the German student Marco Boerries, then 16 years old, was living as an exchange student in Silicon Valley. He was so enthusiastic about the tech scene that he began to develop office software (later known as StarOffice (TM)). In 1986 he founded the

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi Tom, Am 09.04.2012 13:39, schrieb Tom Davies: Hi :) The English version apparently wasn't written by a native English speaker. Obviously Star Office was bought BY Sun not from Sun. Most people probably wouldn't notice little slips like that as the meaning was very clear due to the

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Hazel Russman
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:40:29 +0200 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de wrote: Hi Hazel, Thanks for that. I changed it in the wiki (and wait for the other paragraphs ;-)). -- Grüße k-j OpenOffice.org In May 2002, the first official version was released: OpenOffice.org 1.0

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Tom Davies
-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Monday, 9 April, 2012, 13:38 Hi Tom, Am 09.04.2012 13:39, schrieb Tom Davies: Hi :) The English version apparently wasn't written by a native English speaker

RE: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
-jürgen weghorn ol [mailto:o...@sophia-louise.de] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 05:40 To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History Hi Hazel, Am 09.04.2012 14:23, schrieb Hazel Russman: Here is the first paragraph: [ ... ] The OpenOffice.org project

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] History

2012-04-09 Thread ol klaus-jürgen weghorn
Hi Dennis, Am 09.04.2012 18:31, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: There is apparently a missing digit in the year the OpenOffice.org project was started. It says 13.10.200 ? Changed in 2000 (Also, it is helpful to use International (ISO) dates of the form .mm.dd or -mm-dd since it is an