On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:30:32 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:16:35 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at
This looks like the XAA acceleration is to blame.
If you add
Option XaaNoCPUToScreenColorExpandFill
Then you get most of the text back, except for the menu bar. It seems
that this function isn't honouring transparency information. So we could
add NO_TRANSPARENCY to this or find
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:26:39 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
This looks like the XAA acceleration is to blame.
If you add
Option XaaNoCPUToScreenColorExpandFill
Then you get most of the text back, except for the menu bar. It seems
that this function isn't honouring
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:35:41 +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:26:39 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
This looks like the XAA acceleration is to blame.
If you add
Option XaaNoCPUToScreenColorExpandFill
Then you get most of the text back, except for
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:35:41PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:26:39 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
This looks like the XAA acceleration is to blame.
If you add
Option XaaNoCPUToScreenColorExpandFill
Then you get most of the text back, except for
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:54:34 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:35:41PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:26:39 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
This looks like the XAA acceleration is to blame.
If you add
Option
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:57:51PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:54:34 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:35:41PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:26:39 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
This looks like the XAA acceleration is
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:16:35 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:09:08PM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Making a direct rendering 3D driver render to a windows backing store
area is a
On Mit, 2002-10-30 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:16:35 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:09:08PM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Making a direct rendering 3D driver
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:46:56AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Would disabling the DRI when backingstore is enabled give the semantic
consistency you're looking for? I don't have a problem with that,
because 99.99%
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:07:16AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-10-15 at 20:30, Ian Romanick wrote:
Warning: ignorant questions on the way...
I've gotten some questions from a couple of people about backing store with
DRI, on the R100 driver specifically. Because my
On Die, 2002-10-15 at 20:30, Ian Romanick wrote:
Warning: ignorant questions on the way...
I've gotten some questions from a couple of people about backing store with
DRI, on the R100 driver specifically. Because my background isn't firmly
rooted in X-Windows, I wasn't really familiar with
12 matches
Mail list logo
