Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on
the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h.
With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel module.
ok, thank you again, that does fix the
On 8 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on
the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h.
With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
but glxgears only gets about 115.3 frames:
# glxgears -display :1
[1] 6381
577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS
576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS
576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS
577 frames in
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Dave Airlie wrote:
What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ?
nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot...
mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should
all be there, just needing some updates for
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Dave Airlie wrote:
What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ?
nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot...
mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should
Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c :
xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs':
xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function)
xf86glx.c:481: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xf86glx.c:481: error: for each
Thank you for your time and your replies.
Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c :
xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs':
xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function)
xf86glx.c:481:
I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on
the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h.
With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel module.
Leif
On 7 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your time and your
What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ?
nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot...
mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should
all be there, just needing some updates for FreeBSD 5.2,
I'll look into it over the next
