Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h. With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel module. ok, thank you again, that does fix the compile errors in the kernel module. I built the module, and loaded it: # kldstat | grep mach64 51 0xc4e88000 15000mach64.ko # ls -l /dev/dri/card0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 145, 0 Mar 8 08:08 /dev/dri/card0 I set my ld path to point to the new gl libs: # setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH # ldd which glxinfo /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo: libGLU.so.1 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libGLU.so.1 (0x28079000) libGL.so.1 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libGL.so.1 (0x280f3000) libXext.so.6 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libXext.so.6 (0x2816f000) libX11.so.6 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libX11.so.6 (0x2817e000) libc_r.so.5 = /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x28246000) libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x2826a000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x28283000) libstdc++.so.4 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x2835d000) # glxinfo -display :1 name of display: :1.0 display: :1 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes [rest of output snipped for clarity.] but glxgears only gets about 115.3 frames: # glxgears -display :1 [1] 6381 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS which is the same as without dri. So gl thinks it has dri, but performance is no better. (note - the -display :1 is because I am running two Xservers. If I disable the 2nd Xserver, I still get only 115 frames, but I didn't have that output to paste.) (note2 - I am going to try building a few gl games - gltron and tuxracer - and see if they improve.) I looked at the log file, and here is the important output: XFree86 Version 4.3.99.12 (DRI mach64-0-0-7-branch) [snip] (II) LoadModule: glx (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a (II) Module glx: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module GLcore (II) LoadModule: GLcore (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a (II) Module GLcore: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension GLX (II) LoadModule: dri (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a (II) Module dri: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module drm (II) LoadModule: drm (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/freebsd/libdrm.a (II) Module drm: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) LoadModule: ati (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o (II) Module ati: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 6.5.3 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7 [snip] (II) ATI: Shared PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 detected. (II) ATI: Shared PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 assigned to active Device section card0. [snip] (II) ATI(0): [drm] SAREA 2200+1208: 3408 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:00.0 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:00.0 (II) ATI(0): [drm] DRM interface version 1.2 (II) ATI(0): [drm] created mach64 driver at busid pci::01:00.0 (II) ATI(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xc4f0d000 (II) ATI(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xc4f0d000 to 0x282d3000 (II) ATI(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xfd00 (II) ATI(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (II) ATI(0): [drm]
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
On 8 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h. With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel module. ok, thank you again, that does fix the compile errors in the kernel module. I built the module, and loaded it: # kldstat | grep mach64 51 0xc4e88000 15000mach64.ko # ls -l /dev/dri/card0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 145, 0 Mar 8 08:08 /dev/dri/card0 I set my ld path to point to the new gl libs: # setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH # ldd which glxinfo /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo: libGLU.so.1 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libGLU.so.1 (0x28079000) libGL.so.1 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libGL.so.1 (0x280f3000) libXext.so.6 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libXext.so.6 (0x2816f000) libX11.so.6 = /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib//libX11.so.6 (0x2817e000) libc_r.so.5 = /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x28246000) libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x2826a000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x28283000) libstdc++.so.4 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x2835d000) # glxinfo -display :1 name of display: :1.0 display: :1 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes [rest of output snipped for clarity.] but glxgears only gets about 115.3 frames: # glxgears -display :1 [1] 6381 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS which is the same as without dri. So gl thinks it has dri, but performance is no better. Don't expect huge numbers from glxgears, you'll notice more improvement in apps using textures and more geometry than gears. (note - the -display :1 is because I am running two Xservers. If I disable the 2nd Xserver, I still get only 115 frames, but I didn't have that output to paste.) (note2 - I am going to try building a few gl games - gltron and tuxracer - and see if they improve.) You should see a significant difference in those. I looked at the log file, and here is the important output: XFree86 Version 4.3.99.12 (DRI mach64-0-0-7-branch) [snip] (II) LoadModule: glx (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a (II) Module glx: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module GLcore (II) LoadModule: GLcore (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a (II) Module GLcore: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension GLX (II) LoadModule: dri (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a (II) Module dri: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module drm (II) LoadModule: drm (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/freebsd/libdrm.a (II) Module drm: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) LoadModule: ati (II) Loading /2nd/usr/X11R6-DRI/mach64-0-0-7-branch/07_march_2004_no_strict_aliasing/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o (II) Module ati: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.99.12, module version = 6.5.3 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7 [snip] (II) ATI: Shared PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 detected. (II) ATI: Shared PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 assigned to active Device section card0. [snip] (II) ATI(0): [drm] SAREA 2200+1208: 3408 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:00.0 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:00.0 (II) ATI(0): [drm] DRM interface
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] but glxgears only gets about 115.3 frames: # glxgears -display :1 [1] 6381 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 576 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.200 FPS 577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 115.400 FPS which is the same as without dri. So gl thinks it has dri, but performance is no better. Don't expect huge numbers from glxgears, you'll notice more improvement in apps using textures and more geometry than gears. [snip] (II) ATI(0): [drm] Will request pseudo-DMA (MMIO) mode ^ [snip rest of log] Everything in the log looks fine, but you are getting MMIO mode and not real DMA mode. You should use real DMA to get the best performance. Actually, I thought real DMA mode was the default, but you should be able to force it on with: Option DMAMode async in the Device section of XF86Config. thank you. I added this to my XF86Config, and now glxgears reports: 880 frames in 5.0 seconds = 176.000 FPS 878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.600 FPS 883 frames in 5.0 seconds = 176.600 FPS 880 frames in 5.0 seconds = 176.000 FPS 878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.600 FPS more than 50% better. However I ran into unexpected trouble building gltron and have been too busy/distracted to make it work it yet. If you know of a good open source opengl benchmark, I would be grateful to know about it. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Dave Airlie wrote: What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ? nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot... mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should all be there, just needing some updates for FreeBSD 5.2, I'll look into it over the next while (need to sleep for a day or two :-) Dave. I just brought over the missing Makefiles and mach64_drv.c (with PCI ID list removed since it's in mach64.h now) for bsd from mach64-0-0-6-branch. I haven't tested the build, but I think I picked up all the necessary pieces. -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Dave Airlie wrote: What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ? nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot... mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should all be there, just needing some updates for FreeBSD 5.2, I'll look into it over the next while (need to sleep for a day or two :-) Dave. I just brought over the missing Makefiles and mach64_drv.c (with PCI ID list removed since it's in mach64.h now) for bsd from mach64-0-0-6-branch. I haven't tested the build, but I think I picked up all the necessary pieces. Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c : xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs': xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function) xf86glx.c:481: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once xf86glx.c:481: error: for each function it appears in.) xf86glx.c:482: error: `DitherValues' undeclared (first use in this function) If I remove those two variables, the build continues past that point. I don't yet know if it completes because my laptop takes a long time to build X. thanks again. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c : xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs': xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function) xf86glx.c:481: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once xf86glx.c:481: error: for each function it appears in.) xf86glx.c:482: error: `DitherValues' undeclared (first use in this function) If I remove those two variables, the build continues past that point. I don't yet know if it completes because my laptop takes a long time to build X. I've moved the fix over the from the trunk so it should work, it compies on Linux for me .. can't test it at work though.. Dave. thanks again. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
Thank you for your time and your replies.
Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c :
xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs':
xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function)
xf86glx.c:481: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xf86glx.c:481: error: for each function it appears in.)
xf86glx.c:482: error: `DitherValues' undeclared (first use in this function)
If I remove those two variables, the build continues past that
point. I don't yet know if it completes because my laptop takes a long
time to build X.
I've moved the fix over the from the trunk so it should work, it compies
on Linux for me .. can't test it at work though..
With this change I was able to build an Xserver that works, and runs,
but still no hardware accleration, because I still have no drm
kernel module for freebsd. In /var/log/XFree86.0.log I see:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[drm] failed to load kernel module mach64
(II) ATI(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
(EE) ATI(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit Failed
I tried uncommenting this line host.def:
/* #define BuildXF86DRM YES */
That makes the build die with:
echo #define DRM_LINUX 1 opt_drm.h
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I. -I.. -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I.. -I. -I@
-I@/../include -I/usr/include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common
-mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64/../mach64_dma.c
In file included from
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:38:
../mach64_drv.h:44: error: field `list' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:74: error: field `free_list' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:75: error: field `placeholders' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:76: error: field `pending' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h: In function `mach64_find_pending_buf_entry':
../mach64_drv.h:812: warning: implicit declaration of function `list_entry'
../mach64_drv.h:812: error: syntax error before drm_mach64_freelist_t
../mach64_drv.h:817: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:818: error: syntax error before drm_mach64_freelist_t
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c: In
function `mach64_dump_ring_info':
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:401:
warning: implicit declaration of function `list_for_each'
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:401:
error: syntax error before '{' token
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: `entry' undeclared (first use in this function)
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: for each function it appears in.)
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c: At
top level:
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:414:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:415:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:416:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:417:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:418:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:419:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:420:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:421:
error: syntax error before string constant
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
I forgot to bring in the drm_linux_list.h for bsd that was added on
the mach64-0-0-6-branch. I just added it and it is included from drmP.h.
With any luck that should fix the compile errors in the kernel module.
Leif
On 7 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your time and your replies.
Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you! It dies in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/X/xf86glx.c :
xf86glx.c: In function `__MESA_setVisualConfigs':
xf86glx.c:481: error: `kernel8' undeclared (first use in this function)
xf86glx.c:481: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xf86glx.c:481: error: for each function it appears in.)
xf86glx.c:482: error: `DitherValues' undeclared (first use in this function)
If I remove those two variables, the build continues past that
point. I don't yet know if it completes because my laptop takes a long
time to build X.
I've moved the fix over the from the trunk so it should work, it compies
on Linux for me .. can't test it at work though..
With this change I was able to build an Xserver that works, and runs,
but still no hardware accleration, because I still have no drm
kernel module for freebsd. In /var/log/XFree86.0.log I see:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[drm] failed to load kernel module mach64
(II) ATI(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
(EE) ATI(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit Failed
I tried uncommenting this line host.def:
/* #define BuildXF86DRM YES */
That makes the build die with:
echo #define DRM_LINUX 1 opt_drm.h
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I. -I.. -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I.. -I.
-I@ -I@/../include -I/usr/include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common
-mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64/../mach64_dma.c
In file included from
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:38:
../mach64_drv.h:44: error: field `list' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:74: error: field `free_list' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:75: error: field `placeholders' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:76: error: field `pending' has incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h: In function `mach64_find_pending_buf_entry':
../mach64_drv.h:812: warning: implicit declaration of function `list_entry'
../mach64_drv.h:812: error: syntax error before drm_mach64_freelist_t
../mach64_drv.h:817: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../mach64_drv.h:818: error: syntax error before drm_mach64_freelist_t
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c: In
function `mach64_dump_ring_info':
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:401:
warning: implicit declaration of function `list_for_each'
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:401:
error: syntax error before '{' token
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: `entry' undeclared (first use in this function)
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:404:
error: for each function it appears in.)
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c: At
top level:
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:414:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:415:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:416:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:417:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:418:
error: syntax error before string constant
builddir/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/mach64_dma.c:419:
error: syntax error
Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 dri on freebsd 5.2
What is the status of mach64 dri support on freebsd 5.2 ? nobody has tested it for a while, so I say it suffers from bitrot... mach64-0-0-7 is the DRI branch to go with, and Mesa head, the code should all be there, just needing some updates for FreeBSD 5.2, I'll look into it over the next while (need to sleep for a day or two :-) Dave. Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
