RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-11-03 Thread walter wardle
Dear Ed,  Thank you for sharing the web site information for the D-Star Calculator. This site has help me greatly... Sincerely  Walter (KI6SWA) --- On Fri, 10/31/08, Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-31 Thread Barry A. Wilson
I listen a lot on D*STAR and actually hear many calls go unanswered. In reality I want to respond but at the same time don't want to appear to be hogging the system always being the one to join in for a quick conversation. I too know quite a few local hams that have D*STAR radios but have

RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-31 Thread Woodrick, Ed
: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry A. Wilson Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 6:22 AM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming I too know quite a few local hams that have D*STAR radios but have never used them

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread Nate Duehr
Steve Bosshard wrote: It is sad that complexity excludes many would be users. Especially since it's not that complex. I don't know if this says something about hams or just the population in general. :-) Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called If we don't understand it, we can just

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread Nate Duehr
Nate Duehr wrote: Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called If we don't understand it, we can just ignore it that seemed to cover the reasons why the general public has lost interest in anything technological that requires more than two seconds of actual thought... Follow-up to my own

RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread Woodrick, Ed
, October 30, 2008 1:49 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called If we don't understand it, we can just ignore it that seemed to cover the reasons why the general public has lost interest in anything technological

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread Ferrell Brown
: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 1:49 PM Steve Bosshard wrote: It is sad that complexity excludes many would be users.

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread Nate Duehr
Ferrell Brown wrote: Well lets see. I guess everybody assumes that I am a dumbass and don't understand Dstar because of my original post. Anybody that knows me will tell you that I am very well versed in Dstar and the concept it includes. I have 2 2820's 1 91AD and 1 ID-1. I also got a

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming

2008-10-30 Thread David B. Toth
At 05:49 PM 10/30/2008, Ferrell Brown wrote: Well lets see. I guess everybody assumes that I am a dumbass and don't understand Dstar because of my original post. Anybody that knows me will tell you that I am very well versed in Dstar and the concept it includes. I have 2 2820's 1 91AD and 1