RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL]

2009-05-19 Thread Adam Karsin
Hi Tom, Thanks for the reply. I have looked at the webpage, and it seems pretty straight forward. Can you (or anyone on the list) walk me through the menu settings to make sure that I have them correct? I am not quite sure where to locate the C1 message on the 91ad. Also you state I

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Using reflectors

2009-05-19 Thread Tony Langdon
At 10:32 PM 5/19/2009, you wrote: While trying to gain information on how to operate beyond my local repeater I saw instructions on how to link to another repeater and how unlink. I saw instruction on how to connect to a reflector. There was no mention of disconnecting. After I am done

RE: Native D-STAR vs. DPLUS linking (was: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Signal Distance)

2009-05-19 Thread Barry A. Wilson
AEDs Call Sign Routing, I think it was a wise choice to require AED’s on commercial air craft. If it is never needed then all the better, but if an emergency occurs it may just be the one tool that saves a life when access to rapid emergency care is unavailable. For such a small

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Using reflectors

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 22:51:54 +1000, Tony Langdon vk3...@gmail.com said: At 10:32 PM 5/19/2009, you wrote: While trying to gain information on how to operate beyond my local repeater I saw instructions on how to link to another repeater and how unlink. I saw instruction on how to connect to

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:30:36 -0600, Barry A. Wilson ka0...@worldnet.att.net said: (NOTE: I know how we identify MYCALL has been left open to local interpretation because there are a few operators here in Denver that like to play with erroneous MYCALL callsigns like RG8U or COAX because

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication - U.S. ONLY

2009-05-19 Thread John Hays
Yes, its legal (in the US): FCC Part 97.119c One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the call sign by the slant mark (/) or by any suitable word that denotes the slant mark. If an indicator is self-assigned, it must be included

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Programming 2820

2009-05-19 Thread Jim Ujcik
I'm trying to program my brand new 2820 and having all kinds of frustration. I've got the software from Icom, but it's essentially useless as you can't import repeater data. I've got RT's software, but it won't work (unfortunately, not the first time this has happened to me) with either an

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Icom V82: Connectivity and Control for D-Star

2009-05-19 Thread mungewell
Hi, I'm getting closer to getting a D-Star capable rig, most likely the V82 (mainly for the low entry price). I just wanted to check a few things... 1) It looks like the serial port is wired direct to the UT-118 module and connected with a 2.5mm stereo jack to D9 (or D25). Does this need a

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Icom V82: Connectivity and Control for D-Star

2009-05-19 Thread John Hays
IC-V82 (with rebate) $130 + $200 to add D-STAR = $330 IC-91AD = $390 (Prices US$ from Universal Radio) An extra US$60 gets you a true dual band (simultaneous VHF/UHF for FM, D-STAR on one side only at a time) Much better user interface and you can control the radio from its software (may be

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Programming 2820

2009-05-19 Thread Jack
Jim, I have Both the 92ad and the 2820 and I program them both with RT software using the same RDF file I have an OPC cable and will look to see what number it is (it fits the front programming / control jack and I have found that using the RT ct-29 cable (there basic cable) that you can plug

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Woodrick, Ed
It is definitely not silly, because it legally viable solution to station identification. Your statement is silly because it's just as easy for me to do the same thing on voice. Callsigns are hijacked on voice all the time. Just because it can be done some other way doesn't mean that standard

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] U.S. Only - Re: Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread k7ve
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, Woodrick, Ed ewoodr...@... wrote: If you stick to the specifics of the protocol, then if you put something besides your callsign in the field, then it wouldn't be in accordance with the protocol. If it isn't in accordance with the protocol, then you will

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 18:45:53 -0400, Woodrick, Ed So I guess if you want to get down to nitpicking, if the callsign is not in the field then you need to make sure to switch your radio to FM and identify appropriately. Actually the opposite is true... Recent FCC cases have affirmed that, for

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] U.S. Only - Re: Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Woodrick, Ed
The issue is not that it is readily decodable, it is more along the line of having a publicly documented protocol. One might wonder why the DSTAR protocol is published at the ARRL site(http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/ ). It is my understanding that the protocol is

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Aeroflex / Icom DSTAR Test Set

2009-05-19 Thread Steve Bosshard
James N0XIA mentioned on the Texas DSTAR Net tonight that Aeroflex offers a Private Mobile Radio test set that includes DSTAR testing. http://www.aeroflex.com/ats/products/prodfiles/news/031820092.pdf Not for the everyday ham, but I believe this is the first test unit that works with DSTAR.

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Icom V82: Connectivity and Control for D-Star

2009-05-19 Thread mungewell
1) It looks like the serial port is wired direct to the UT-118 module and connected with a 2.5mm stereo jack to D9 (or D25). Does this need a level shifter? I found the service manual which shows the circuit for the UT-118 contains a MAX232, so input to radio is RS232 levels. 2) Does

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Aeroflex / Icom DSTAR Test Set

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
That's cool. Expected June 2009. Nate WY0X On Wed, 20 May 2009 02:00:02 -, Steve Bosshard bossh...@gmail.com said: James N0XIA mentioned on the Texas DSTAR Net tonight that Aeroflex offers a Private Mobile Radio test set that includes DSTAR testing.

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 21:36:36 -0400, Woodrick, Ed ewoodr...@ed-com.com said: Interesting, I see that Pactor III protocol is published at http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/PACTOR-III.html Ahh they finally gave in and realized it was illegal to keep it proprietary, I see.