[Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's

2009-01-25 Thread N1IX
I was going to install the sub-receiver in my K3. Then I thought it might me advantageous to have a second K3 instead. I need a back up radio also. Are there any opinions? Dave N1IX___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must

Re: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's

2009-01-25 Thread Jerry Flanders
A few weeks ago on this reflector I mentioned that I was using my two K3s for diversity. I have two full station setups (primarily for RTTY contesting), and one is connected to 80/20/10 antennas and the other to a 40/15. Also, each separate station feeds a different side earpiece in my

Re: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's

2009-01-25 Thread WILLIS COOKE
for backup, but I would trade a well used TS 850 or a lightly used TS 440 for a second K3 without hesitation Willis 'Cookie' Cooke K5EWJ --- On Sun, 1/25/09, N1IX n...@verizon.net wrote: From: N1IX n...@verizon.net Subject: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Date

Re: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's

2009-01-25 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Back in the 1950's the ultimate Ham rig include a kilowatt amplifier for each band, often stacked in a cabinet on the desktop or in a rack alongside the desk (we still had to adjust our transmitters when we QSY'd in those days). Separate amps allowed one to optimize the circuits and have them

Re: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's

2009-01-25 Thread wayne burdick
I have a dream :) Wayne Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: Perhaps it's time to revisit that concept with a K3 for each band, or at least a K3 for each mode... --- http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net