I was going to install the sub-receiver in my K3.
Then I thought it might me advantageous to have a second K3 instead.
I need a back up radio also. Are there any opinions?
Dave N1IX___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must
A few weeks ago on this reflector I mentioned that I was using my two
K3s for diversity. I have two full station setups (primarily for RTTY
contesting), and one is connected to 80/20/10 antennas and the other
to a 40/15. Also, each separate station feeds a different side
earpiece in my
for backup, but I would
trade a well used TS 850 or a lightly used TS 440 for a second K3 without
hesitation
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke
K5EWJ
--- On Sun, 1/25/09, N1IX n...@verizon.net wrote:
From: N1IX n...@verizon.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Sub-receiver or 2 k3's
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date
Back in the 1950's the ultimate Ham rig include a kilowatt amplifier for
each band, often stacked in a cabinet on the desktop or in a rack alongside
the desk (we still had to adjust our transmitters when we QSY'd in those
days). Separate amps allowed one to optimize the circuits and have them
I have a dream
:)
Wayne
Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
Perhaps it's time to revisit that concept with a K3 for each band, or
at
least a K3 for each mode...
---
http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
5 matches
Mail list logo