my recollection from a few years back is that the rigorous exact-stop mode is
G61.1
this stops at the end of *every* move.
G61 improves slightly on this by blending moves where the
end-tangent of the previous move matches the start-tangent of the next
move.
So with G61 there would be no stop
Michael,
I've tried creating a test branch off of master and off of 2.5 then
applying the patch but I get an error when I run git am.
error: patch failed: src/emc/rs274ngc/interp_cycles.cc:347
I think Rob also had a problem but he didn't spell it out but mentioned
git so I suspect it might be
On 7 January 2012 06:06, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
I mentioned the 7i43 since it also has a USB port but cannot be used.
It has been made to work on USB with EMC2.
http://youtu.be/BraEMAu5UkY
But I am not clear on what changes were made.
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as
2012/1/7 Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com:
There are two options, I suppose.
Provide a different mode, where this
restriction is ignored, and the CAM is trusted to not ever exceed the
machine acceleration limits.
Or, develop an N-block look-ahead, and I know that can be QUITE
complex.
Could
I use G64 Pnn on my plasma with thousands of tiny lines and arcs and I
can't tell that it is slowing down much if any and that is at plasma
cutting speeds of up to 300IPM. Without G64Pnn the whole plasma table
shakes as the speed ramps up and down... even contouring you should be
roughing out
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:35PM -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
I just had somebody ask me about contouring performance of EMC2.
I spotted something in the user manual I had never seen before, section
3.1.4, that says that no move can ever go fast enough that the machine
cannot stop at the end of
Jeff Epler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:35PM -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
I just had somebody ask me about contouring performance of EMC2.
I spotted something in the user manual I had never seen before, section
3.1.4, that says that no move can ever go fast enough that the machine
