Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-17 Thread John Clark
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 6:02 PM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: *> I wrote a white paper years ago about putting Lithium 6 in a target, say > a foil. Deuterium ions are accelerated to the foil so that Li6 + D --> Be8 > --> 2He4 plus 24 MeV. That energy is in the form

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-17 Thread Lawrence Crowell
the world. Materials. > (just polysilicon) plus batteries. > > Upside? Replaces the Fossil and thus reliance on Putin. but we go EV's and > Hybrids. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Lawrence Crowell > To: Everything List > Se

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
essage- From: Lawrence Crowell To: Everything List Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 6:02 pm Subject: Re: A major fusion breakthrough? I think this approach to fusion is silly. I also think the Tokamak approach is overwrought. I will give a possible to do this in different ways. I wrote a white paper

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
over politics versus problem solving, one's engineering work will naturally suffer.   -Original Message- From: John Clark To: spudboy...@aol.com Cc: everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 2:57 pm Subject: Re: A major fusion breakthrough? On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:20

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread Lawrence Crowell
als.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.055215> >> >> The point is because the achievement listed is largely a century away >> commercially, we need to as a species focus on primary energy generation >> from other sources. >> >> -Original

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread John Clark
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:20 PM wrote: *> Now, I'd also be asking JC how much longer is his fav, MSR-U235 or > MSR-Thorium 232/233?* That depends on how much money is put into liquid fuel thorium reactor R, it would take a hell of a lot of money to make it practical but a lot less than the

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
am Subject: Re: A major fusion breakthrough? On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:16 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: > This result means the energy delivered from the laser shock wave on a > deuterium pellet was .67 the fusion energy re

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
Message- From: Lawrence Crowell To: Everything List Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:18 pm Subject: Re: A major fusion breakthrough? On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 9:41:50 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:16 AM

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread Dylan Distasio
hievement listed is largely a century away > commercially, we need to as a species focus on primary energy generation > from other sources. > > -Original Message- > From: Lawrence Crowell > To: Everything List > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:18 pm > Subject: Re: A major fusion

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
. -Original Message- From: Lawrence Crowell To: Everything List Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:18 pm Subject: Re: A major fusion breakthrough? On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 9:41:50 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-16 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 6:51 PM Brent Meeker wrote: * > Doesn't the laser pulse just vaporize the gold coating which in turn > compresses and heats the pellet?* > Things happen so fast that by the time it takes for slow moving vaporized gold debris to hit the target (slow moving compared with

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-15 Thread Lawrence Crowell
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 9:41:50 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:16 AM Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > *> This result means the energy delivered from the laser shock wave on a >>

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-15 Thread Brent Meeker
Doesn't the laser pulse just vaporize the gold coating which in turn compresses and heats the pellet? Brent On 12/15/2022 7:41 AM, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:16 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: /> This result

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-15 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:17 AM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:16 AM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: *> This result means the energy delivered from the laser shock wave on a > deuterium pellet was .67 the fusion

Re: A major fusion breakthrough?

2022-12-15 Thread Lawrence Crowell
This result means the energy delivered from the laser shock wave on a deuterium pellet was .67 the fusion energy released. It does not take into account the much larger amounts of energy needed to run the laser system, energy that does not make it to the pellet. This is a breakthrough of