On 13 Oct 2012, at 17:55, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Keep in mind that I use the compatibilist definition of free
will, which is the (machine) ability to exploits its self-
indetermination (with indetermination in the Turing sense,
On 13 Oct 2012, at 17:55, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Keep in mind that I use the compatibilist definition of free
will, which is the (machine) ability to exploits its self-
indetermination (with indetermination in the Turing sense,
On 14.10.2012 01:46 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:16:06PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Another question here would be who will divide the state space to
a bacterium and environment. Let us imagine that we have
implemented somehow a bacterium in Game of Life (or
On 09 Aug 2012, at 23:48, John Mikes wrote:
Let me try to shorten the maze and copy only whatever I want to
reflect to. Sorry if it causes hardship - JM
-
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 08 Aug 2012, at 23:00, John Mikes wrote:
On Wed,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.10.2012 01:46 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:16:06PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Another question here would be who will divide the state space to
a bacterium and environment. Let us imagine
Autopoesis is a useful definition for life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopoiesis
Autopoiesis (from Greek a?to- (auto-), meaning self, and p???s?? (poiesis),
meaning creation, production) literally means self-creation and expresses a
fundamental dialectic among structure, mechanism and
Hi Roger,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Autopoesis is a useful definition for life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopoiesis
Autopoiesis (from Greek a?to- (auto-), meaning self, and p???s??
(poiesis), meaning creation, production) literally
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 12:46:38 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Yes, the Big Bang is a program. There are initial conditions and rules
that lead deterministically to the unfolding of the entire
Contest by FQXi
http://www.fqxi.org/community/essay
Click Read the contest entries to find it out.
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Craig,
Congratulations. I think the episode is very good. To me, your ideas come
though a lot more clearly in this media than in text.
Jason
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, local community TV anyways.
Jose is a great host, producer, and
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:04:54 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
No, he does NOT assume this. He assumes the opposite: that
consciousness is a property of the brain and CANNOT be reproduced by
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
But if a computer beats you at an intelligent task, it would have to be
programmed to do so.
And you would have to be educated to do so.
which means that its intelligence would be that of the programmer.
Then how can the
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
you can see from the differences between conjoined twins, who have the
same nature and nurture, the same environment, that they are not the same
people
That is true they are not the same people, and just like EVERYTHING else
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
And lets not forget those who insist that in order to qualify as free
will the conscious choice must not be done for a reason AND it must not
not be done for a reason.
Why? They are inconsistent
Very inconsistent!
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:42:40 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
you can see from the differences between conjoined twins, who have the
same nature and nurture, the same environment, that they are not the same
Thanks Jason!
Yes, I agree. It's hard for me to try to remember which ideas need to have
what kind of trail of breadcrumbs to get to. In text I am kind of exploring
new ideas and explaining the other ideas at the same time, so I'm not as
focused on bridging the gap to a general audience. It
On 10/14/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
mailto:rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
But if a computer beats you at an intelligent task, it would have to be
programmed
to do so.
And you would have to be educated to do so.
which
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:19:14 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/14/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Roger Clough rcl...@verizon.net javascript:wrote:
But if a computer beats you at an intelligent task, it would have to be
programmed to do so.
And you would
Computational Autopoetics is a term I just coined to denote applying basic
concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to do it more
justice
than I can. I cannot guarantee that the idea hasn't already been exploited, but
I have
seen no indication of that.
The
On 10/14/2012 11:36 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:19:14 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/14/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 Roger Clough rcl...@verizon.net javascript: wrote:
But if a computer beats you at an intelligent task, it
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Computational Autopoetics is a term I just coined to denote applying basic
concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to do it
more justice
than I can. I cannot guarantee that the idea hasn't
21 matches
Mail list logo
